Interchange

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 35–47 | Cite as

It'salmost time for CAI

  • Leslie D. McLean
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, T., Weiner, M., Malkin, S., & Howell, J. Evaluation of the New York City CAI Project in Elementary Arithmetic, Second Year, 1969–70. Research Report 70-16, October 1970, Division of Teacher Education, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  2. Avner, R. A., & Tenczar, P. J. The TUTOR manual. Report X-4, March 1970, University of Illinois Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory, Urbana.Google Scholar
  3. Bitzer, D. L., Blomme, R., Sherwood, B., & Tenczar, P. J. The PLATO system and science education. In,Proceedings of a Conference on Computers in Undergraduate Science Education. New York: American Institute of Physics, 1971. Pp.335–354.Google Scholar
  4. Bitzer, D., & Johnson, R. PLATO: A computer-based system used in the engineering of education.Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1971,59, 960.Google Scholar
  5. Bitzer, D., & Skaperdas, D.. The economics of a large-scale computerized-based education system: PLATO IV. In W. H. Holtzman (Ed.),Computer-assisted instruction, testing and guidance. New York: Harper & Row, 1970. Pp.17–29.Google Scholar
  6. Brahan, J. W.. CAL language standards. In,Proceedings of the Canadian Symposium on Instructional Technology. Ottawa: National Research Council, 1972, Pp.351–359.Google Scholar
  7. Bunderson, C. V. Mainline CAI, necessary but not oppressive. In,Proceedings of the American Federation of Information Processing Societies Spring Joint Computer Conference. American Federation of Information Processing Societies, 1972. Pp.399–405.Google Scholar
  8. Computer memory forecast.Computerworld, May 10, 1972, p.39.Google Scholar
  9. Ensor, D. A.. A time-sharing system for the PDP-9. In,DECUS Proceedings Fall 1969. Maynard, Mass.: Digital Equipment Computer Users Society, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, K. A. CAI cost analysis. In H. E. Mitzel, K. A. Hall, M. N. Suydam, L. C. Jansson, & R. V. Igo, A Commonwealth consortium to develop, implement and evaluate a pilot program of computer-assisted instruction for urban high schools. Report No. R-47, July 1971, Pennsylvania State University CAI Laboratory. Pp.61–73.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, A. L. Computer-assisted instruction: Two major demonstrations.Science, 1972,176, 1110–1112. (a)Google Scholar
  12. Hammond, A. L. Computer-assisted instruction: Many efforts, mixed results.Science, 1972,176, 1006. (b)Google Scholar
  13. Hicks, B. L., & Hunka, S.The teacher and the computer. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Judd, W. A., Bunderson, C. V., & Bessent, E. W. An investigation of the effects of learner control in computer-assisted instruction prerequisite mathematics (MATHS). Technical Report No. 5, November 1970, University of Texas CAI Laboratory, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  15. Leavitt, D. B-1700 logic meets users' purposes.Computer-world, Aug. 9, 1972, p.11.Google Scholar
  16. Le Corre, Y., & Jacoud, R. Computer-assisted instruction—The experiment of the Faculty of Science in Paris. Technical Report, March 31, 1971, OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.Google Scholar
  17. Lekan, H..Index to computer-assisted instruction. Washington, D.C.: Educational Technology Center, Sterling Institute, 1969.Google Scholar
  18. Lower, S. K. Making CAI make a difference in college teaching. In,Proceedings of the Canadian Symposium on Instructional Technology. Ottawa: National Research Council, 1972. Pp.65–73.Google Scholar
  19. Lyman, E. R. A descriptive list of PLATO programs 1960–70. (2nd rev. ed.) Report X-2, May 1970, University of Illinois Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory, Urbana.Google Scholar
  20. McLean, L. D., Brown, W. C., Davy, T., & Samuel, L. L. Video terminals for computer-aided learning systems.Newsletter, Associate Committee on Instructional Technology, 1971,1, 204.Google Scholar
  21. McLean, R. S.. TSS-9 revisited. In,DECUS Proceedings Spring 1970. Maynard, Mass.: Digital Equipment Computer Users Society, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. MITRE Corporation.Toward a market success for CAI—An overview of the TICCIT program. McLean, Va.: MITRE, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Mitzel, H. E., Hall, K. A., Suydam, M. N., Jansson, L. C., & Igo, R. V. A Commonwealth consortium to develop, implement and evaluate a pilot program of computer-assisted instruction for urban high schools. Report No. R-47, July 1971, Pennsylvania State University CAI Laboratory.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, C. E.Computer-assisted instruction project. Title Ill Report. Rockville, Md.: Montgomery County Public Schools, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. Olivier, W. P. Author and student controlled mathematics instruction by computer with CAN-4. In,Proceedings of the Canadian DECUS. Carleton Place, Ont.: Digital Equipment of Canada, 1970. Pp.29–35.Google Scholar
  26. Olivier, W. P. Program sequence by ability interaction in learning a hierarchical task by computer-assisted instruction. Technical Report No. 4. March 1971, University of Texas CAI Laboratory, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  27. Olivier, W. P. Computer-assisted mathematics for upgrading student skills. In,Proceedings of the Canadian Symposium on Instructional Technology. Ottawa: National Research Council, 1972, Pp.207–220.Google Scholar
  28. Proceedings of the Canadian Symposium on Instructional Technology. Ottawa: National Research Council, 1972.Google Scholar
  29. Stifle, J.. The PLATO IV architecture. Report No. X-20, April 1971, University of Illinois Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory, Urbana.Google Scholar
  30. Suppés, P., & Morningstar, M.. Computer-assisted instruction.Science, 1969,166, 343–350.Google Scholar
  31. Sutherland, I. E. Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system. Technical Report No. 296, 1963, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  32. Suydam, M. N., Beardslee, E., & Howell, J. Summative evaluation. In H. E. Mitzel, K. A. Hall, M. N. Suydam, L. C. Jansson, & R. V. Igo, A Commonwealth consortium to develop, implement and evaluate a pilot program of computer-assisted instruction for urban high schools. Report No. R-47, July 1971, Pennsylvania State University CAI Laboratory.Google Scholar
  33. Tenczar, P. J., & Golden, W. M. Spelling, word, and concept recognition. Research paper, University of Illinois, Computer-based Educational Research Laboratory, Urbana, 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Weiner, M., Malkin, S., Helm, C., & Howell, J. An evaluation of the 1968–69 New York City Computer-Assisted Instruction Project in Elementary Arithmetic. July 1969, Division of Teacher Education, City University of New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie D. McLean

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations