Skip to main content
Log in

A developmental learning strategy for early reading in a laboratory nursery school

  • Early Learning
  • Project Reports
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-year investigation on early reading, using a developmental learning model for cognitively structuring and sequencing learning processes, was designed to test the efficacy of the model in a practical nursery school setting with a diversity of teaching styles. Using primers, guides, and materials developed by the investigator, over 80% (107) of 132 three-to five-year-old children learned to read with moderate to high fluency and interest. Pretest letter recognition skill, CA, and especially MA (but neither IQ nor sex of child) predicted success in learning. Certain analytic-integrative cognitive operations, which were built into the method, and a minimal general level (MA) of cognitive and language development appear essential to learning to read.

Résumé

Le but d'une enquête sur la question d'apprendre à lire tôt était de mettre au point un modèle de la structure et de la série d'apprentissage développemental (developmental learning) dans un contexte d'une école maternelle avec une variété de styles d'instruction. A l'aide de livres élémentaires, de guides, et de matériaux développés par l'investigateur, plus de 80 pour cent (107) de 132 enfants âgés de trois à cinq ans ont appris à lire avec facilité et avec intérêt d'assez bien à bien. L'habileté à reconnaître des lettres aux prétests, l'âge chronologique (CA), et l'âge mental (MA) (mais ni l'IQ ni le sexe de l'enfant) ont prédit le succès à apprendre. Certaines des opérations de la méthode et un niveau général de base (MA) du développement cognitif et de la langue semblent nécessaire pour apprendre à lire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, E. Kindergarteners pace themselves in reading.Elementary School Journal, 1964,64, 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. Acceleration of intellectual development in early childhood. Final report, 1967, University of Illinois, Project No. 2129, Office of Education, Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare.

  • Bernstein, B., Social class and linguistic development: A theory of social learning. In A H Halsey, J. Floud, & C. A. Anderson (Eds.),Education, economy, and society. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1961. Pp.288–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. Linguistics and reading.Elementary English Review, 1942,19(4), 125–130; 1942,19(5), 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L., & Barnhart, C. L.,Let's read. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W. A study of reading ability in preschool children. Unpublished master's thesis, Stanford University, 1924.

  • Cazden, C. B. Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1965.

  • Cazden, C. B., Subcultural differences in child language.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1966,12, 185–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J.Learning to read. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. M.Genetic studies of genius. Vol.2.The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, H. P. An experimental study of bright, average, and dull children at the four-year mental level.Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1931,9, 119–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, H. C.. A study of the effect of an educational program upon language development and related mental functions in young children.Journal of Experimental Education, 1942,11, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, E. J. The development of language in twins: I. A comparison of twins and single children.Child Development, 1932,3, 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, D.Children who read early. New York: Teachers College Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. Reading, logic and perception. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.),Educational therapy. Washington, D.C.: Special Child Publication, 1967. Vol.2. Pp. 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnham-Diggory, S. Symbol and synthesis in experimental “reading”.Child Development, 1967,38, 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, W. G. Early education and continuous stimulation.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1968,1, 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., & Wohlwill, J. F. Formal and functional aspects of cognitive development. In D. Elkind & J. H. Flavell (Eds.),Studies in cognitive development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969. Pp. 67–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, R.Why Johnny can't read. New York: Harper, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. Cognitive learning in infancy and early childhood.Psychological Bulletin, 1962,2, 116–152. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. Teaching a two-year-old to read: An experiment in early childhood learning.Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1962,66, 181–283. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. Structural dimensions of the learning process in early reading.Child Development, 1964,35, 1093–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. A study of process and method in three-year-old twins and triplets learning to read.Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1965,72, 3–89. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. Concept learning in early childhood.Young Children, 1965,21, 81–91. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. Dimensions for environmental control over developmental learning.Psychologia Wychowawcza, 1967,10(3), 265–281; 1967,10(4), 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. The effect of early stimulation in the emergence of cognitive processes. In R. D. Hess & R. M. Bear (Eds.),Early education. Chicago: Aldine, 1968. Pp. 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. The effect of early stimulation: The problem of focus in developmental stimulation.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1969,15, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W., & Burnett, A. Models for learning in an integrated preschool.Elementary School Journal, 1967,67, 428–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. Learning to read.Science, 1965,148, 1066–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassam, E. H., & Morss, R. D.Beacon teachers' manual (original approach). (2d rev. ed.) Boston: Ginn, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., & Wingo, C. E.Reading with phonics. (Rev. ed.) Chicago: Lippincott, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Shipman, V. C. Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children.Child Development, 1965,36, 869–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S.Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. McV. The epigenesis of intrinsic motivation and the fostering of early cognitive development. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.),The challenge of incompetence and poverty. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1969. Pp. 94–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J.The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, C. E. Psycholinguistic disabilities of children with reading problems.Exceptional Children, 1966,32, 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keister, B. V. Reading skills acquired by five-year-old children.Elementary School Journal, 1941,41, 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendlar, T. S. Is there an ontogeny of learning and transfer? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research and Child Development, Santa Monica, Calif., March 1969.

  • Kjeldergaard, P., & Frankenstein, R. Grapheme-phoneme regularity and its effects on early reading: A pilot study. University of Pittsburgh Learning Research & Development Center, February 1967.

  • Kohlberg, L. Early education: A cognitive-developmental view.Child Development, 1968,39, 1013–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavatelli, C. S. Functional role of language in transition to concrete-operational thought. Paper presented at biennial meeting of Society for Research and Child Development. Santa Monica, Calif., March 1969.

  • Lenneberg, E. H.Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R.The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Liveright, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. Language development in children. In L. Carmichael (Ed.),Manual of child psychology. (2d ed.) New York: Wiley, 1954. Pp.492–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, P., & Brzeinski, J. E.The effectiveness of teaching reading in kindergarten. Cooperative Research Project No. 5-0371. Denver: Denver Public Schools, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, J. D. Programmed instruction versus usual classroom procedures in teaching boys to read.American Educational Research Journal, 1964,1, 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. The development of language. In P. A. Mussen (Ed.),Carmichael's manual of child psychology. Vol.1 (Rev. ed.) New York: Wiley, 1970. Pp.1061–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menyuk, P. Syntactic rules used by children from preschool through first grade.Child Development, 1964,35, 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. E., & Dingman, H. F. The structure of abilities at the preschool ages: Hypothesized domains.Psychological Bulletin, 1960,57, 514–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, O. K., & Anderson, A. R. The responsive environments project. In R. D. Hess & R. M. Bear (Eds.),Early education. Chicago: Aldine, 1968. Pp.171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. Language acquisition and cognitive development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social-Cultural Aspects of Mental Retardation, Nashville, June 1968.

  • Perlish, H. N.Wordland workshop. Philadelphia: Triangle, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufall, P. B., & Furth, H. G.. Recognition and learning in visual sequences in young children.Child Development, 1966,37, 827–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymont, T. A.,A history of the education of young children. London: Longmans, Green, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, H. W.The perception of stimulus relations. New York: Academic, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafica, F. C., & Sigel, I. E. Styles of categorization and reading disability. Merrill-Palmer Institute [undated].

  • Sigel, I. E., & Hooper, F. H. (Eds.)Logical thinking in children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. The role of imitation in early language learning Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research and Child Development, Minneapolis, March 1965.

  • Slobin, D. I. The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In F. Smith & G. A. Miller (Eds.),The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966. Pp.129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W. The teaching of reading and mathematics at the kindergarten level.Ontario Journal of Educational Research, 1964,7, 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, L. C. Language and growth: The relative efficacy of early and deferred vocabulary training, studied by the method of co-twin control.Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1930,8, 215–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M. H. Listen to the little ones.Elementary School Journal, 1964,64, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. An experiment in infant education.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1918,2, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., et al.Genetic studies of genius. Vol.1.Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. H. Evidence for a hierarchical arrangement of learning processes. In L. Lipsitt & C. C. Spiker (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior. Vol.2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilderspin, S.Early discipline (illustrated; orThe infant system progressing and successful) London: Westley & Davis, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, P. A. A genetic of fifty gifted children. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), Intelligence: Its nature and nurture.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 1940,39 (Part II), 401–408.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

OISE

The author wishes to express his appreciation to the many people who helped make this project possible—administrators, teachers, testers, parents, and above all the children. I would like to mention, especially, Roald Campbell, Dean of the Graduate School of Education, University of Chicago, for his administrative and financial support; Frank Lloyd, Director of the University Laboratory School; the teachers, Ann Benedict, Carol Brindley (also for test illustrations), Kay Franklin, Yvonne Lawson, Gloria Needleman, Marianna Terry, Arlene Labow, Joan Schreiner, and Masha Semkoff; to researchers, Eleanor Haspel, Julia Holt, James McGinnis, Ann Rotstein, and particularly Muriel Lo for the analysis of data; to Jane Hill (for editorial assistance); to Joyce Flow for her excellent typing; and my three daughters, Josephine, Monique, and Velia for illustrating the primers as only children can.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowler, W. A developmental learning strategy for early reading in a laboratory nursery school. Interchange 2, 106–125 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137795

Keywords

Navigation