Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Poverty and early education in Canada

  • Thomas J. Ryan
Early Learning General Issues in Early Learning
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Current concern regarding the need for early childhood intervention programs is rationalized through a review of the characteristics of disadvantaged children and a discussion of findings regarding early experiences, both with infrahumans and with children. The representative selection of Canadian intervention programs described provides the background for a critical appraisal of the issues involved in intervention research as well as specific proposals for future intervention procedures in Canada.

Keywords

Early Childhood Intervention Program Critical Appraisal Early Experience Future Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

L'intérêt courant dans la nécessité des programmes d'intervention préscolaires est expliqué par une revue des caractéristiques des enfants désavantagés et par une discussion des informations concernant les expériences de bas âge chez les animaux et chez les enfants. Les programmes représentatifs de l'intervention préscolaire canadienne décrits dans cet article offrent les données de base pour une évaluation critique des questions que posent les recherches de l'intervention et des projects spécifiques pour des recherches futures dans les procédés d'intervention au Canada.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bereiter, C., & Engelmann, S.Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. S.Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, B. M., & Mozell, C. Mother-child attachment patterns: comparisons between a group with early day care experience and a home-reared group.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 196939, 237–238.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, B. M., & Richmond, J. B. The Children's Centre: A microscopic health, education, and welfare unit. Progress report, 1967, Children's Bureau, Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  5. Canada. Department of Labour, Women's Bureau.Working mothers and their child-care arrangements. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B. The Brunswick-Cornwallis Pre-School: A program for disadvantaged white and Negro children.Child Study, 1967,29, 17–27.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, B. Progress report: April, 1968–April, 1969. Dalhousie University, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, E. Personality development. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Dennis, W. Causes of retardation among institutional children: Iran.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1960,96, 47–59.Google Scholar
  10. Dennis, W., & Najarian, P. Infant development under environmental handicap.Psychological Monographs, 1957,71, 1–13.Google Scholar
  11. Dominion Bureau of Statistics. Private kindergarten and nursery schools in Canada, 1968–1969. Education Division, DBS, Catalogue No. 81-221, July 1969.Google Scholar
  12. Family Service Agency of Hamilton. Project FREND 69. Hamilton, Aug. 1969.Google Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. H.The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand, 1963.Google Scholar
  14. Fowler, W. Cognitive learning in infancy and early childhood.Psychological Bulletin, 1962,59, 116–152.Google Scholar
  15. Fowler, W. The concept of developmental learning. Paper presented at the 133rd meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Fowler, W. the dimensions for environmental control over developmental learning.Psychologia Wychowawcza, 1967,10(3), 265–281;10(4), 385–397.Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, W. Developmental proposal for operation of an infant day care and education program. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. Fowler, W. Infant developmental learning demonstration program: Preliminary progress report. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. Fowler, W. Demonstration infant day care and education program: Interim report, 1969–1970. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Fowler, W. The differential development of competence and deficit and some perspectives for Canada. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  21. Hawthorn, H. B. (Ed.)A survey of the contemporary Indians of Canada. Vol. II.Economic, political, educational needs and policies. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Hebb, D. O.The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.Google Scholar
  23. Hebb, D. O.A textbook of psychology. 2d ed.) Philadelphia: Saunders, 1966.Google Scholar
  24. Hess, R. D. Parental behavior and children's school achievement-implications for Head Start. In E. Grotberg (Ed.),Critical issues in research related to disadvantaged children. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1969.Google Scholar
  25. Hunt, J. McV.Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald, 1961.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, F. E., & Selby, J. School performance and social class. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  27. Kirk, S. A.Early education of the mentally retarded. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  28. Leviston, M. Is grade one too late?Quest, 1966,3, 28–29.Google Scholar
  29. Mickelson, N. I., & Galloway, C. G. Cumulative language deficit among Indian children.Exceptional Children, 1969,36, 187–190.Google Scholar
  30. Moffitt, A. Language, cognition and poverty. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  31. Mogenson, G. J. The effects of early experience on behavior: Animal studies. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  32. National Council of Jewish Women (Montreal Section). History and progress of preschool enrichment program and mothers' group and effects of combined projects in Pointe St. Charles Area, Montreal. Progress report, 1969.Google Scholar
  33. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Perspectives on human deprivation: Biological, psychological and sociological. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, 1968.Google Scholar
  34. Ontario. Dept. of Education.Living and learning. Report of the provincial committee on the aims and objectives of education in the schools of Ontario. Toronto: The Department, 1968.Google Scholar
  35. Ottawa Day Nursery. Family day care demonstration project: Progress report 1969–1970. Ottawa, Apr. 1970.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, J.The effects of junior kindergarten on achievement: The first five years. Toronto: Board of Education, 1966.Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, J. L.The origins of intellect: Piaget's theory. San Francisco: Freeman, 1969.Google Scholar
  38. Robinson, G. C. Physical growth and development: Some social aspects during prenatal and postnatal life. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. Self-fulfilling prophesies in the classroom: Teachers' expectations as unintended determinants of pupils' intellectual competence. In M. Deutsch, I. Katz, & A. R. Jensen (Eds.),Social class, race and psychological development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968. Pp.219–253.Google Scholar
  40. Ryan, T. J. The effect of early experience on human development. In T. J. Ryan (Ed.),Poverty and children. New York: McGraw-Hill, in press.Google Scholar
  41. Schlesinger, B. Family life in the Kibbutz of Israel: Utopia gained or paradise lost? University of Toronto, 1968.Google Scholar
  42. Schlesinger, B. One-parent families. Paper presented at the Vanier Institute of the Family Annual Meeting, Ottawa, Apr. 1970.Google Scholar
  43. School Readiness Center (Edmonton). Early ventures in learning. University of Alberta, 1969.Google Scholar
  44. Skeels, H. M. Adult status of children with contrasting early life experiences.Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 1966,31 (No. 105).Google Scholar
  45. Toronto Board of Education. Study of achievement: Junior kindergarten—Who is served and who goes. Toronto: The Board, 1965.Google Scholar
  46. Vanier Institute of the Family. Submission to the Special Senate Committee on Poverty. Ottawa, Feb. 17, 1970.Google Scholar
  47. Vernon, P. Educational and intellectual development among Canadian Indians and Eskimos.Educational Review, 1966,18, 186–195.Google Scholar
  48. Weikart, D. P. Preliminary results from a longitudinal study of disadvantaged preschool children. Paper presented at the convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, St. Louis, Mo., 1967.Google Scholar
  49. Weikart, D. P.The Language Training Curriculum. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High-Scope Education Research Foundation, 1970. (a)Google Scholar
  50. Weikart, D. P.The Cognitive Curriculum. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High-Scope Education Research Foundation, 1970. (b)Google Scholar
  51. Weikart, D. P.The Unit-Based Curriculum. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High-Scope Education Research Foundation, 1970. (c)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Ryan
    • 1
  1. 1.Carleton UniversityOttawa-CarletonCanada

Personalised recommendations