Skip to main content
Log in

Frank observations on innovation in elementary schools

  • Innovations in Learning and Processes of Educational Change
  • Curriculum
  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Instructional innovation in the elementary school often is reported in educational literature as superficial and/or compromised. this paper presents curriculum installation guidelines and recommendations for consideration by educators responsible for effecting intended curriculum change. Based on intensive field experiences in more than 60 schools of diverse characteristics, and supported by survey responses of innovating administrators and teachers, the guidelines reveal actual implementation problems that impede and endanger curriculum change efforts. Educators who undertake local or regional curriculum change are encouraged to transform their theoretical models for change into concrete, replicable activities (work) and events that directly deal with the field problems that stimulated the guidelines. References are made to a series of curriculum installation projects that were progressively more successful because the guidelines were formulated and made operational in the field.

Résumé

L'innovation de l'instruction en classe élémentaire est souvent rapportée dans la documentation éducative comme superficielle et/ou compromise. Cette étude présente les grandes lignes pour l'installation de plans d'études et les recommandations à considérer par les éducateurs responsables pour réaliser les changements de programme projetés. Basées sur des expériences intensives conduites dans plus de 60 écoles de formations diverses et secondées par les résultats d'études d'administrateurs et de professeurs innovateurs, les grandes lignes révèlent des problèmes réels d'exécution qui entravent et mettent en danger les efforts de changement de plans d'études. Les éducateurs qui se chargent de changement de plans d'études local ou régional, sont encouragés à transformer leurs modèles théoriques du changement en activités concrètes et reproduisibles (travail) et en événements qui abordent directement les problèmes sur les lieux qui avaient stimulé les grandes lignes. L'étude fait mention d'une série de projets d'installation de plans d'études qui ont éprouvé du succès progressif grâce au fait que les grandes lignes étaient formulées et rendues opérantes sur le lieu-même.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, W. M.Changing curriculum content: Report. Washington, D. C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrulis, R. S.Variables affecting installation: A research report. Part I. Syracuse, N.Y.: Eastern Regional Institute for Education, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., & Chin, R. (Eds.)The planning of change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., & Chin, R. (Eds.)The planning of change. (2d ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickell, H. M.Organizing New York State for educational change. Albany: New York State Education Department, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. O.Change processes in the public schools. Eugene, Ore.: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. L. & Guba, E. G., An examination of potential change roles in education. InRational planning in curriculum and instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, Center for the Study of Instruction, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. L. Developing a strategy for innovation. Symposium presented at the Associated Staff Training Program for the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Feb. 1968.

  • Goodlad, J. I. & Klein, M. F.Behind the classroom door. Worthington, O.: Jones, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N., Giaquinta, J. B., & Bernstein, M. An attempt to implement a major educational innovation: A sociological inquiry. Report No. 5, 1968, Center for Research and Development of Educational Preference, Harvard University.

  • Hartman, A.,Installation strategies: A retrospective and prospective analysis. Syracuse, N.Y.: Eastern Regional Institute for Education, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. G.A guide to innovation in education. Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, University of Michigan, 1970.

  • Hearn, N. E. The where, when, and how of trying innovations.Phi Delta Kappan, 1972,53, 358–361, 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, M. R. (Ed.)Strategies for planned curricular innovation. New York: Teachers College Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, R. R. (Ed.)Strategies for curriculum change: Papers. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahan, J. M. Curriculum installation and diffusion strategies. In B. G. Andreas (Ed.),Research into process curricula. Syracuse, N.Y.: Eastern Regional Institute for Education, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahan, J. M. 1972, ASCD Action Laboratory #6: Preliminary survey on innovation in the elementary school. Unpublished questionnaire, Center for Innovation in Teacher Education, University of Indiana, Bloomington, Ind., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. (Ed.)Innovation in education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morphet, E. L., & Ryan, C. O. (Eds.)Designing education for the future: Planning and effecting needed changes in education. Denver: Publishers Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrin, R. J.An analysis of sources and processes of innovation in education. Eugene, Ore.: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polemni, A. J. A study of the status of Title III projects.Phi Delta Kappan, 1969,51, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M.Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. C. An identification and assessment of installation strategies. In B. G. Andreas (Ed.),Research into process curricula. Syracuse, N.Y.: Eastern Regional Institute for Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T. E.,The administration of educational innovation. Eugene, Ore.: Bureau of Educational Research, School of Education, University of Oregon, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahan, J.M. Frank observations on innovation in elementary schools. Interchange 3, 144–160 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137641

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02137641

Keywords

Navigation