Experientia

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 29–31 | Cite as

Changes effected in vitro upon some morphological properties of particles of virus BAI-strain A

  • P. Bartl
  • J. Korb
  • J. Řiman
Kurze Mitteilungen
  • 7 Downloads

Keywords

Morphological Property 

Zusammenfassung

Sphäroidale und phag-ähnliche Form des Hühner-Leukosis-Virus (BAI, Stamm A) wird der Existenz eines kontrahierbaren Systems (Interaktion mit ATP) zugeschrieben. Formveränderungen des Viruspartikels unter ATP-Einfluss werden in vitro dargestellt, wobei Parachlormorcuribenzoat, Phenylmercuriborat und N-Äthylmaleimid als Inhibitoren wirken.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Beard, E. A. Eckert, T. Z. Czáky, D. G. Sharp, andJ. W. Beard, Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med.75, 533 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. G. Sharp, E. A. Eckert, D. Beard, andJ. W. Beard, J. Bacteriol.63, 151 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. W. Beard, Poultry Sci.35, 203 (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. W. Beard, Texas Reports on Biology and Medicine15, 627 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. A. Bonar andJ. W. Beard, J. Nat. Cancer Inst.23, 183 (1959).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. W. Beard,Progress in Hematology (1962), vol. III, p. 105.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Bartl, J. Řfman, andF. Šorm, Exper.19, 635 (1963).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Bartl, J. Řfman, andJ. Korb, Proc. III. Europ. Reg. Conf. on Electron Microscopy, Prague (1964), vol. B, p. 373.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. W. Beard, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.68, 473 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. A. Eckert, D. Beard, andJ. W. Beard, J. Nat. Cancer Inst.12, 447 (1951).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Řfman, Folia biol., Praha10, 331 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. C. Backus, J. appl. Phys.23, 150 (1952).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. H. Weber, in Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology (1955), vol. IX, p. 271.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Hoffmann-Berling, Biochim. biophys. Acta19, 453 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    U. Muscatello, E. Andersson-Cedergren, andG. F. Azzone, Biochim. biophys. Acta63, 55 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Green andJ. W. Beard, J. Nat. Cancer Inst.15, 1217 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. B. Novikoff, G. De Thé, D. Beard, andJ. W. Beard, J. cell. Biol.15, 451 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. V. Perry, inMethods in Enzymology (Ed.S. P. Colowick andN. O. Kaplan, Academic Press, New York 1955), vol. II, p. 582–588.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. S. G. Barron, Adv. Enzymol.11, 201 (1951).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Löw, Biochim. biophys. Acta32, 1 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Ernster andL. C. Jones, J. cell. Biol.15, 563 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Löw, Biochim. biophys. Acta32, 11 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Friedmann, Biochim. biophys. Acta9, 65 (1952).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Ch. Skou, Biochim. biophys. Res. Comm.10, 79 (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Bartl
    • 1
  • J. Korb
    • 1
  • J. Řiman
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Biochemical Investigation of Cancer, Instituto of Organic Chemistry and BiochemistryCzechoslovak Academy of SciencesPragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations