Summary
The bacterial colonizing of the intrauterine device (IUD) and its tail were studied in 152 IUDs obtained from 70 symptomless IUD wearers, 13 women with dysfunctional bleeding, 23 women with pelvic inflammatory disease, 31 women in whom the tail of an IUD was no longer visible and 17 women who were pregnant with an IUD in situ. The IUDs were either removed by the transcervical route or through a fundal incision in the uterus after hysterectomy. Most IUD were heavily contaminated by bacteria, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococci and anaerobic Lactobacilli. The number of colonies was higher in women with dysfunctional bleeding and pelvic inflammatory disease than in others with a predominance of pathogenic bacteria, namely β-hemolytic Streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Almost half of the IUDs without a tail protruding through the cervix were sterile. With pregnancy in the presence of an IUD, 71% of devices grew bacteria which were mainly anaerobic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arandes E, Ramirez-Weiser R, Satterthwaite AP (1965) Study of tissue reaction in hysterectomy specimens removed after insertion of intrauterine devices. In: Segal SJ, Sontham AL, Shafer KD (eds) Intrauterine contraception. Excerpta Med [Amsterdam] Int. Congress Series No. 86 : 232
Cates W Jr, Ory HW, Rochat HW, Tyler CW Jr (1976) The intrauterine devices and deaths from spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med 295: 1155–1159
Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Gilstrup LC, Herbert WNP, Kappus SS (1978) The bacterial pathogenesis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 52: 161–164
Dahlberg B (1978) Infection of the male reproductive tract. Prog Reprod Biol 3: 46–59
Eschenbach DA, Harnisch JP, Holmes KK (1977) Pathogenesis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease: role of contraception and other risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128: 838–850
Faulkner WL, Ory HW (1976) Intrauterine device and acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Am Med Assoc 235: 1851–1853
Feichter GE, Tauber PF, Rosenthal E, Ludwig H (1978) Zur bakteriellen Besiedlung kupferhaltiger Intrauterinpessare. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 38: 904–914
Fowler JE Jr (1981) Infections of the male reproductive tract and infertility. A selected review. J Androl 3: 121–131
Golde SH, Israel R, Ledger WJ (1977) Unilateral tubo-ovarian alscess: a distinct entidy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 127: 807–810
Hasson HM (1982) Uterine geometry and IUCD design. Br J Obstet Gynecol Suppl 4: 1–10
Holdemann LV, Cato EP, Moore W (1977) Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th edn. Polytechnic Institute, Virginia
Kaufmann DW, Shapiro S, Rosenberg L, Mouson RR, Miettingen OS, Stolley PD, Slone D (1980) Intrauterine contraceptive device use and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 159–162
Kurz KH (1981) Avoidance of the dimensional incompatibility as the main reason for side effects in intrauterine contraception. Contracept Delic Syst 2: 21–29
Lippes J (1975) Infection and the IUD: a preliminary report. Contraception 12: 103
Mishell DR, Bell JH, Good RG, Moyer DL (1966) The intrauterine device: a bacteriological study of the endometrial cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 96: 119–126
Mishell DR, Moyer DL (1969) Association of pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine device. Clin Obstet Gynecol 12: 179–197
Nygren L, Nielsen P (1979) Abstract No. 33, in: Medicated IUD's and polymeric delivery systems. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Amsterdam
Osser S, Gullberg B, Liedholm P, Sjöberg NO (1978) Is development of pelvic inflammatory disease in women using intra-uterine device equal regardless of parity? A one year follow-up study. Contraception 17: 563–567
Purrier BGA, Sparks RA, Watt PJ, Elstein M (1979) In vitro study of the possible role of the IUCD tail in ascending infection of the genital tract. Br J Obstet Gynecol 86: 374–378
Scott W (1978) Pelvic abscess in association with intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131: 149–156
Soderstrom RM (1978) Das wandernde IUP. Sexualmedizin 7: 95–99
Sparks RA, Purrier BGAO, Watt PJ, Elstein M (1977) The bacteriology of the cervix and the uterus. Br J Obstet Gynecol 84: 701–704
Sparks RA, Purrier BGAO, Watt PJ, Elstein M (1981) Bacteriological colonization of uterine cavity: role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device. Br Med J 282: 1189–1191
De Swiet M, Ramsay ID, Rees GM (1975) Bacterial endocarditis after insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device. Br Med J 3: 76–77
Targum SD, Wright NH (1974) Association of IUD and PID. A retrospective study. Am J Epidemiol 100: 262–271
Tatum HJ, Schmidt FH, Phillips D, McCarty M, O'Leary W (1975) The Dalkon shield controversy: structural and bacteriological studies of IUD tails. JAMA 231: 711–717
Thaler L, Paldi E, Steiner D (1978) Intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease. Int J Fertil 23: 69–72
Westrom L, Bengtsson LP, Mardh PA (1976) The risk of PID in women using intrauterine devices as compared to nonusers. Lancet 2: 221–224
Whitson LG, Israel R, Bernstein G (1974) The extrauterine Dalkon shield. Obstet Gynecol 44: 418–423
Wolke P, Zwahr C, Wittstock G (1977) Klinische, bakteriologische und histologische Untersuchungen nach mehrjähriger Einlage eines IUD zur Kontrazeption. Zentralbl Gynäkol 99: 880–883
Wright NH (1968) Acute PID in an indigent population: An estimate of its incidence and relationship to methods of contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 101: 979–990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Sektion Infektionskrankheiten des ZIM (Leiter: Prof. Dr. E. Vanek)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, A.S., Krieger, D. Bacterial colonization of intrauterine devices (IUDs). Arch. Gynecol. 239, 31–37 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02134286
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02134286