Annals of Vascular Surgery

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 462–466 | Cite as

Effect of perigraft seroma fluid on fibroblast proliferation in vitro

  • Victor E. Pricolo
  • Fabio Potenti
  • Clarence H. Soderberg
Case Reports
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Different theories have been postulated in the last 10 years in an attempt to explain the pathogenetic mechanisms involved in perigraft seroma formation. This paper reports our experience with in vitro analysis of the cellular composition and the effect of perigraft seroma fluid on fibroblast proliferative activity. Our results indicate that the cellular component of the fluid was almost exclusively represented by polymor-phonuclear leukocytes. Perigraft seroma fluid was stimulatory on fibroblast growth, while plasma samples from the patient and normal controls were inhibitory. These findings suggest that a perigraft seroma may represent a complex phenomenon which cannot be explained exclusively in terms of fibroblast stimulation or inhibition. This pattern displays a close similarity to experimental observations in the early phases of wound healing. Perigraft seroma formation could be mediated by an intense and persistent chemotactic stimulus on leukocytes, which does not allow normal progression of wound healing through fibroblast growth and collagen deposition.

Key words

Perigraft seroma fibroblast proliferation grafts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    BLUMENBERG RM, GELFAND ML, DALE WA. Perigraft seroma complicating arterial grafts.Surgery 1985;97:194–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    LE BLANC RA, VINCE DJ, TAYLOR GP. Perigraft seroma: long-term complications.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:451–454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LE BLANC J, ALBUS R, WILLIAMS WG, et al. Serous fluid leakage: a complication following the modified BlalockTaussig shunt.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88:259–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    FIVEZ F, VAN HEE R, BEELAERTS W, et al. Pseudotumor formation in polytetrafluoroethylene-dialysis fistulae.Am J Kidney Dis 1986;8:459–461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AHN SA, MACHLEDER HI, GUPTA R, et al. Perigraft seroma: clinical, histologic and serologic correlates.Am J Surg 1987;154:173–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    SZILAGYI DE. In discussion of KAUPP HA, MATULEWIECZ TJ, LATTIMER GL, et al. Graft infection or graft reaction?Arch Surg 1979;114:1419–1422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    BHUTA I, DORROUGH R. Noninfectious fluid collection around velour dacron grafts: possible allergic reaction.South Med J 1981;74:870–872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BOLTON W, CANNON JA. Seroma formation associated with PTFE vascular graft used as artero-venous fistulae.Dial Transplant 1981;10:60–66.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    SLADEN JG, MANDL MAJ, GROSSMAN L, et al. Fibroblast inhibition: a new and treatable cause of prosthetic graft failure.Am J Surg 1985;149:587–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    PRICOLO VE, CALDWELL MD, MASTROFRANCESCO B, et al. Modulatory activities of wound fluid on fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis.J Surg Res 1990;48:534–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    NEMETH GG, BOLANDER ME, MARTIN GR. Growth factors and their role in wound and fracture healing. In: BARBUL A, PINES E, CALDWELL MD, HUNT TK (eds).Growth Factors and Other Aspects of Wound Healing—Biological and Clinical Implications. New York: A.R. Liss Inc., 1988, pp 1–17.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    BUCKLEY-STURROCK A, WOODWARD SC, SENIOR RM, et al. Differential stimulation of collagenase and chemotactic activity in fibroblasts derived from rat wound repair tissue and human skin by growth factors.J Cell Physiol 1989;138:70–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DAVIDSON JM, KLAGSBURN M, HILL KE, et al. Accelerated wound repair, cell proliferation and collagen accumulation are produced by a cartilage-derived growth factor.J Cell Biol 1985;100:1219–1227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MCGEE GS, DAVIDSON JM, BUCKLEY A, et al. Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates wound healing.J Surg Res 1988;45:145–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FREUNDLICH B, BOMALASKI JS, NEILSON E, et al. Regulation of fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis by cytokines.Immunol Today 1986;7:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    THOMAS KA. Fibroblast growth factors.FASEB J 1987;1:434–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    GREISLER HP, SCHWARCZ TH, ELLINGER J, et al. Dacron inhibition of arterial regenerative activities.J Vasc Surg 1986;3:747–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    GREISLER HP, DENNIS JW, ENDEAN ED, et al. Macrophage/biomaterial interactions: the stimulation of endothelialization.J Vasc Surg 1989;9:588–593.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor E. Pricolo
    • 1
  • Fabio Potenti
    • 1
  • Clarence H. Soderberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryRhode Island Hospital and Brown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations