Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of arteriovenous fistulas on in situ saphenous vein bypasses

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Intraoperative identification and later development of arteriovenous fistulas were investigated prospectively in 70 in situ saphenous vein bypass procedures. Surveillance was performed by completion arteriography and intra- and postoperative continuous wave Doppler examination. The intraoperative Doppler examination identified 89% of those branches with sufficient flow to opacify the deep venous system on completion arteriogram. Half of the missed fistulas underwent spontaneous thrombosis, and in only one case did the arteriovenous fistula lead to hemodynamic symptoms demanding surgical closure of the fistula. Pursuing a policy of selectively ligating fistulas that only fill the deep venous system on completion arteriography led to an additional nine arteriovenous fistulas. Developed over an average follow-up of six months, four patients presented symptoms of edema and swelling and were relieved upon closure of the fistulas. The incidence of bypass thrombosis did not differ significantly among patients with remaining arteriovenous fistulas, patients who developed fistulas during follow-up, and patients who had no signs of arteriovenous fistulas. It seems justified to continue selective intraoperative ligation of arteriovenous fistulas based on continuous wave Doppler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LEATHER RP, SHAH DM. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass. In: RUTHERFORD RB (ed).Vascular Surgery 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1989, pp 422.

    Google Scholar 

  2. GALLAND RB, YOUNG AE, JAMIESON CW. In situ vein bypass: a modified technique.Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1981;63:186–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DENTON MT, HILL D, FAIRGRIVE J. In situ femoropopliteal and distal vein bypass for limb salvage: an experience of 50 cases.Br J Surg 1983;70:358–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. HALL KV, ROSTAD H. In situ bypass in the treatment of femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease: a ten-year study.Am J Surg 1978;136:158–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DUNDAS P. The in situ vein bypass.J Cardiovasc Surg 1973;7:53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BEARD JD, LEE RE, ALDOORI MI, et al. Does the in situ technique for autologous vein femoropopliteal bypass offer any hemodynamic advantage?J Vasc Surg 1986;4:588–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. GWYNN BR, SHEARMAN CP, SIMMS MH. The influence of patent branches on in situ vein graft haemodynamics.Eur J Vasc Surg 1987;1:169–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. SKAGSETH G, HALL KV. In situ vein bypass. Experiences with vein valve strippers.Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;7:53–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. SHEARMAN CP, GANNON MX, GWYNN BR, et al. A clinical method for the detection of arteriovenous fistulas during in situ greater saphenous vein bypass.J Vasc Surg 1986;4:578–581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. CAVE-BIGLEY DJ, ACKROYD HA, CAMPBELL H, et al. Complications associated with in situ vein grafts for femoropopliteal bypass.Br J Surg 1984;71:211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. WOELFE KD, LOEPRECHT H, WEBER H, et al. Intraoperative assessment of in situ saphenous vein bypass grafts by vascular endoscopy.Eur J Vasc Surg 1988;2:257–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. KEITZER WF, LICHTI EL, BROSSART FA, et al. Use of the Doppler ultrasonic flowmeter during arterial vascular surgery.Arch Surg 1972;112:270–272.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MOZERSKY DJ, SUMNER DS, BARNES RW, et al. Intraoperative use of a sterile ultrasonic flow probe.Surg Gynecol & Obstet 1973;136:279–280.

    Google Scholar 

  14. BARNES RW, GARRET WV. Intraoperative assessment of arterial reconstruction by Doppler ultrasound.Surgery 1978;146:896–900.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SPENCER TD, et al. Intraoperative assessments of in situ saphenous vein bypass grafts with continuous-wave Doppler probe.Surgery 1984;96:874–876.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LEATHER RP, SHAH DM, BUCHBINDER D, et al. Further experiences with the saphenous vein used in situ for arterial bypass.Am J Surg 1981;142:506–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. LEATHER RP, POWERS SR, KARMODY AM. A reappraisal of the in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass: its use in limb salvage.Surgery 1979;86:453–461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. BELL PRF, et al. The definition of critical ischemia of a limb.Br J Surg 1982;69(Suppl):S2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. STRANDNESS DE, BELL JW. Peripheral vascular disease: diagnosis and evaluation using a mercury strain gauge.Ann Surg 1965;161:3–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LEATHER RP, SHAH DJ, CHANG BB, et al. Resurrection of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. 1000 cases later.Ann Surg 1988;208:435–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LEOPOLD PW, KUPINSKI AM, CORSON JD, et al. Hemodynamic observations related to in situ bypass arteriovenous fistulae.Vasc Surg 1987;21:265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  22. CHANG BB, LEOPOLD PW, KUPINSKI AM, et al. In situ bypass hemodynamics. The effect of residual A-V fistulae.J Cardiovasc Surg 1989;30:843–847.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SUMNER DS. Essential hemodynamic principles. In: RUTHERFORD RB (ed).Vascular Surgery 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1989, p 18.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LEOPOLD PW, CHANG BB, SHANDALL AA, et al. Transcutaneous flow measurements in in situ bypasses: an assessment of duplex scanning.Angiology 1986;37:143–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LE HERON D. Postoperative evaluation of in situ saphenous vein bypass with technetium-labelled albumin microspheres.Texas Heart Inst J 1982;1:27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTON NO, JAMIESON CW. A hydrodynamic model of a small vessel adjunctive arteriovenous fistula.J Cardiovasc Surg 1985;26:412.

    Google Scholar 

  27. SUMNER DS. Noninvasive assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. In: RUTHERFORD RB (ed).Vascular Surgery 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1989, p 102.

    Google Scholar 

  28. SUMNER DS, RUTHERFORD RB. Hemodynamics and pathophysiology of arteriovenous fistulas. In: RUTHERFORD RB (ed).Vascular Surgery 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1989, p 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  29. LE MAITRE GD. Injuries, pitfalls and sundry encumbrances. In: LE MAITRE GD (ed).In Situ Bypass Grafting. Andover: Vascutech, 1987, p 81.

    Google Scholar 

  30. LANGERON P, PUPPINCK P, CORDONNIER D. La technique de la greffe veineuse “in situ” dans la chirurgie arterielle restauratrice des membres inferieurs.J Chir (Paris) 1978;115:171–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rørdam, P., Jensen, L.P., Schroeder, T. et al. The effect of arteriovenous fistulas on in situ saphenous vein bypasses. Annals of Vascular Surgery 5, 419–423 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02133045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02133045

Key words

Navigation