Skip to main content
Log in

Value of continued efforts at limb salvage despite multiple graft failures

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Treatment of patients with limb-threatening ischemia after multiple failed bypasses remains difficult and controversial. Further revascularization procedures despite failure of the original procedure may be viewed as futile. The purpose of this report is to determine the efficacy of third or fourth revascularization procedures after the original and second procedures fail. Over a 10-year period from January 1, 1983, to December 31, 1992, 312 infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 271 consecutive patients for foot salvage. The overall limb salvage rate was 84%, and the operative mortality rate was 3.7% (10 patients). Sixteen patients (5.8%) had repeat infrainguinal bypasses performed after failure of two or more prior bypass procedures in the same leg. Twenty-three reconstructions were performed in these 16 patients. There were no operative deaths. One half of these patients had major amputations performed within the first year following their tertiary or fourth reconstructive procedure. Sixty-two percent of patients have survived longer than 3 years after their third or fourth procedure. One half of these patients have maintained graft patency and an excellent quality of life. Only 22% of the patients requiring amputation ambulated wth a prosthesis, whereas all revascularized patients ambulated. Although this subset of patients is known to have an increased risk of repeated graft failure and limb loss, we believe continued efforts at limb salvage despite multiple previous graft failures is justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silverman SH, Flynn TC, Seeger JM. Secondary femoral-distal bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg 1991;32:121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maini BS, Mannick JA. Effect of arterial reconstruction on limb salvage. A ten-year appraisal. Arch Surg 1978;113:1297–1304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hobson RW II, Lynch TG, Jamil Z, et al. Results of revascularization and amputation in severe lower extremity ischemia: A five-year clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 1985;2:174–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Bandyk DF, et al. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypass during 1981 to 1989: Determinant factors of long-term patency. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:137–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: Five-year results of a modern series. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery/North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1986;4:80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Wengerter KR, et al. Changing arteriosclerotic disease patterns and management strategies in lower limb threatening ischemia. Ann Surg 1990;212:402–414.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lambert GE. Management alternatives of infrainguinal arteriosclerotic obliterans in the elderly. Surg Clin North Am 1986;66:293–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittemore AD, Clowes AW, Couch NP, et al. Secondary femoropopliteal reconstructions. Ann Surg 1981;193:35–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al. Improved strategies for secondary operations on infrainguinal arteries. Ann Vasc Surg 1990;3:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Veith RJ, Gupta SK, Samson RH, et al. Progress in limb salvage by reconstructive arterial surgery combined with new or improved adjunctive procedures. Ann Surg 1981;194:386–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tyson RR, Grosh JD, Rerchle FA. Redo surgery for graft failure. Am J Surg 1978;136:165–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flinn WR, Harris JP, Rudo ND, et al. Results of repetitive distal revascularization. Surgery 1982;91:566–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brewster DC, LaSalle AJ, Robinson JG, et al. Femoropopliteal graft failures. Clinical consequences and success of secondary reconstructions. Arch Surg 1983;118:1043–1047.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricco JB, Flinn WR, McDaniel MD, et al. Objective analysis of factors contributing to failure of tibial bypass grafts. World J Surg 1983;7:347–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartlett ST, Olinde AJ, Flinn WR, et al. The reoperative potential of infrainguinal bypass: Long-term limb and patient survival. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:170–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, et al. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3: 104–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler JR, Gregory RT, Snyder SO, et al. Gore-Tex autogenous vein composite grafts for tibial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1984;6:914–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

George, S.M., Klamer, T.W. & Lambert, G.E. Value of continued efforts at limb salvage despite multiple graft failures. Annals of Vascular Surgery 8, 332–336 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132993

Keywords

Navigation