Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 475–488 | Cite as

Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence

  • Kathleen M. Galotti
Article

Abstract

Sixty-four undergraduates wrote responses to the question, “When faced with a moral dilemma, what issues or concerns influence your decision?” The responses were coded according to one or more of 13 themes by independent raters blind to the subjects' gender. Six of the themes were identified as “feminine” themes and seven as “masculine” themes on the basis of previous work by Gilligan ([1982],In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts), Kohlberg ([1976], “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach,” in Lickona, T. [ed.],Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and social Issues, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), and others. Only one association between gender and the presence of any given theme reached statistical significance: Thus, there is little evidence to support the idea that men and women differ in their reports of how they think about moral dilemmas. For all subjects, the average proportion of possible feminine themes in a response was higher than the proportion of possible masculine themes. This finding supports the idea than an exclusive focus on themes such as rights and responsibilities will fail to capture many of the considerations all subjects regard as most important.

Keywords

Gender Difference Health Psychology School Psychology Social Issue Moral Reasoning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in moral reasoning: Response to Walker's (1984) conclusion that there are none.Child Develop. 57: 511–521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, M. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986).Women's Ways of Knowing. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bussey, K., and Maughan, B. (1982). Gender differences in moral reasoning.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 42: 701–706.Google Scholar
  4. Clinchy, B., and Zimmerman, C. (1982). Epistemology and agency in the development of undergraduate women. In Perun, P. (ed.),The Undergraduate Woman: Issues in Educational Equity. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., and Liberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study, of moral judgement.Monogr. Res. Child Develop. 48: (1, Serial No. 200).Google Scholar
  6. Ford, M. R., and Lowery, C. R. (1986). Gender differences in moral reasoning: A comparison of the justice and care orientations.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 50: 777–783.Google Scholar
  7. Galotti, K. M., and Kozberg, S. F. (1987). Older adolescents' thinking about academic/vocational and interpersonal commitments.J. Youth Adoles. 16: 313–330.Google Scholar
  8. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a difference voice.Harvard Educat. Rev. 47: 481–517.Google Scholar
  9. Gilligan, C. (1982).In a Difference Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Gilligan, C., and Belenky, M. F. (1980). A naturalistic student of abortion decisions. In Selman, R. L., and Yando, R. (eds.),New Directions for Child Development: Clinical Developmental Psychology (No. 7). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Hanson, R. A., and Mullis, R. L. (1985). Age and gender differences in empathy and moral reasoning among adolescents.Child Study J. 15: 181–188.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman, M. L. (1975). Sex differences in moral internalization.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 32: 720–729.Google Scholar
  13. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Kohlberg, L. (1984).Essays in Moral Development. Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A. (1983).Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Resonse to Critics. S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  16. Lyons, N. P. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality.Harvard Educat. Rev. 53: 125–145.Google Scholar
  17. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Rest, J. R. (1979).Development in Judging Moral Issues. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  19. Scheidel, D. G., and Marcia, J. E. (1985). Ego identity, intimacy, sex role role orientation, and gender.Develop. Psychol. 21: 149–160.Google Scholar
  20. Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L., and Goodlette, M. (1984). Sex differences in the moral values of college students and their parents.Sex Roles 10: 877–883.Google Scholar
  21. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review.Child Develop. 55: 677–691.Google Scholar
  22. Walker, L. J. (1986a). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A rejoinder to Baumrind.Child Develop. 57: 522–526.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, L. J. (1986b). Experiential and cognitive sources of moral development in adulthood.Human Develop. 29: 113–124.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., and Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas.Child Develop. 58: 842–858.Google Scholar
  25. Yussen, S. R. (1977). Characteristics of moral dilemmas written by adolescents.Develop. Psychol. 13: 162–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen M. Galotti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton CollegeNorthfield

Personalised recommendations