This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bigus, O, Hadden, S. C., & Glaser, B. The study of basic social processes. In R. Smith & P. Manning (Eds.),The handbook of social science methods: Qualitative methods. New york: Irving, 1978.
Burke, K.A grammar of motives. Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. of California Press, 1969.
Cicourel, A.Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press, 1964.
Cicourel, A.The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley, 1968.
Cicourel, A.Cognitive sociology. New York: Free Press, 1974.
Cooley, C. H.Human nature and the social order. New York: C. Scribner, 1922.
Garfinkel, H.Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.),Theoretical sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
Glaser, B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.Social Problems, 1965,12, 436–445.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
Goffman, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.
Goffman, E.Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press, 1963.
Goffman, E.Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, 1967.
Goffman, E.Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1969.
Gurwitsch, A.Field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Univ. Press, 1964.
Hadden, S. C. & Lester, M. Ethnomethodology and grounded theory methodology: An integration of topic and method.Urban Life, forthcoming.
Kadushin, C. The professional self concept of music students.American Journal of Sociology, 1969,75 389–404.
Kuhn, M., & McPartland, T. S. An empirical investigation of self attitudes.American Sociological Review 1954,19 68–76.
Kuhn, M. Self attitudes by age, sex, and professional training.Sociological Quarterly 1960,1 39–65.
Leiter, K. Telling it like it is: A study of teachers' accounts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1971.
Lyman, S., & Scott, M. Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension.Social Problems 1969,15 236–248.
Lyman, S., & Scott, M. Accounts.American Sociological Review 1968,33 46–62.
Mead, G. H.Philosophy of the present. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1932.
Mead, G. H.Mind, self and society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1934.
Mead, G. H.The philosophy of the act. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.
Mills, C. W. Situated actions and vocabularies of motives.American Sociological Review 1940,5 904–913.
Mulford, H., & Salisbury, W. Self conceptions in a general public. In J. Manis & B. Meltzer (Eds.),Symbolic interaction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1964.
Pollner, M. On the foundations of mundane reason. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1970. Portions are forthcoming inHuman Studies.
Sacks, H. Sociological description.Berkeley Journal of Sociology 1963,8 1–17.
Sacks, H. Search for help: No one to turn to. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1966.
Sacks, H. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972. (a)
Sacks, H. On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.),Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972. (b)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language 1974,50 696–735.
Schegloff, E. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972.
Schutz, A.Collected papers, I (M. Natanson, Ed.). the Hague: Nijhoff, 1971.
Shibutani T. Reference groups as perspectives.American Journal of Sociology 1955,60 562–569.
Stone, G. Appearances and the self. In A. Rose (Ed.),Human behavior and social processes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1962.
Stone, G., & Gross, E. Embarrassment and the analysis of role requirements.American Journal of Scoiology 1964,70 1–15.
Strauss, A.George Herbert Mead on social psychology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1964.
Thomas, W. I.Source book for social origins. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1909.
Weinberg, M. S. Embarrassment: Its variable and invariable aspects.Social Forces 1968,46 382–388.
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction.Social Problems 1977,24. 521–530
Wieder, D. L.Language and social reality: The case of the convict code. London: Mouton Press, 1974.
Wilson, T. P. Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation.American Sociological Review 1970,35 697–709.
Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Douglas (Ed.),Understanding everyday life. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.),Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Reprints of this paper may be obtained from Marilyn Lester at Department of Sociology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154.
We wish to thank the following people who read and commented on one or more versions of this work: Odis Bigus, Allen Grimshaw, Candace West, Graham Tomlinson, and Don Zimmerman. We also wish to thank Carolyn Mullins for editorial assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadden, S.C., Lester, M. Talking identity: The production of “self” in interaction. Hum Stud 1, 331–356 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132622
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132622