Human Studies

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 167–183 | Cite as

Habermas' purge of pure theory: Critical theory without ontology?

  • Theodore Kisiel
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W.Zur Metakritik der Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1956.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W.Negative Dialektik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. Apel, K.-O.Transformation der Philosophie, Vol. I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Böhler, D.Metakritik der Marxschen Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Gadamer, H.-G.“Replik,” Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. Habermas J.Theorie und Praxis (orig. publ. 1963). Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1969. (a)Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, J. Gegen einen positivistisch halbierten Rationalismus (orig. publ. 1964). In T. W. Adorno (Ed.),Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1969. (b)Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. Summation and response.Continuum 1970,8 123–133, esp. p. 129. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Habermas J. Towards a theory of communicative competence.Inquiry 1970,13 360–375, esp. p. 367. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J.Knowledge and human interests (orig. publ. 1968) (J. J. Shapiro, trans.). Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1971. (a)Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J.Towards a rational society. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1971. (b)Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J.Theorie und Praxis (orig. publ. 1963), 4th ed. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1971. (c)Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J.Erkenntnis und Interesse 2nd ed. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973. (a)Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. Postscript toKnowledge and human interests (C. Lenhardt, trans.).Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1973,3 157–180. (b)Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J., & Luhmann, N.Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M.What is called thinking? (F. D. Wieck & J. G. Gray, trans.). New York: Harper & Row, 1968.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger M. The origin of the work of art. InPoetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, trans.). New York: Harper & Row, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Kisiel, T. Ideology critique and phenomenology: The current debate in German philosophy.Philosophy Today 1970,14 151–160.Google Scholar
  19. Kisiel, T. On the dimensions of a phenomenology of science in Husserl and the young Dr. Heidegger.Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1973,4 217–234.Google Scholar
  20. Kisiel, T. In W. Dallmayr (Ed.),Materialen zu Habermas' “Erkenntnis und Interesse”. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar
  21. Kockelmans, J. J., & Kisiel, T. J.Phenomenology and the natural sciences. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Marcuse, H.Reason and revolution. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  23. Marcuse, H. One-dimensional man. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  24. Marx, K.Critique of Hegel's “Philosophy of Right” (A. John & J. O'Malley, trans.). London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M.Sense and non-sense (H. L. & P. A. Dreyfus, trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  26. Pöggeler, O. Die ethischpolitische Dimension der hermeneutischen Philosophie. In G.-G. Grau (Ed.)Probleme der Ethik. Freiburg/Munich: Alber, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. Ethics and culture; Habermas and Gadamer in dialogue.Philosophy Today 1973,17 153–165.Google Scholar
  28. Toulmin, S.Human understanding. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  29. Wetter, G. A.Dialectical materialism (P. Heath, trans.). New York: Praeger, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ablex Publishing Corporation 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore Kisiel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalb

Personalised recommendations