Skip to main content
Log in

Notes toward a historical definition of realism

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Henry H. H. Remak, “Richard Brinkmann, Wirklichkeit und Illusion. Studien über Gehalt und Grenzen des Begriffs Realismus für die erzählende Dichtung des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts”,The Germanic Review XXXIV, no. 2, April 1959, p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See for instance,Metzler Literatur Lexikon. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1984, pp. 353–354.

  3. René Wellek, “The Concept of Realism in Literary Scholarship” inConcepts of Criticism. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1963, p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  4. , p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  5. , p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicole Mozet, “Introduction” to Balzac'sLa Comédie humaine. Paris: Gallimard, 1976, vol. IV, p. 806.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balzac,, pp. 818, 842, 930.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Philippe Hamon, “Un discours contraint” in Roland Barthes, Leo Bersani, Philippe Hamon, Michael Riffaterre, Ian Watt:Littérature et réalité. Paris: Seuil, 1982, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fredric Jameson,The Political Unconscious. Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, New York: Cornell UP, 1981, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michel Foucault,Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard, 1966, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. , p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. , p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  13. , p. 332.

    Google Scholar 

  14. , p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. , p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. , p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Hillis Miller, “Presidential Address 1986. The Triumph of Theory, the Resistance to Reading, and the Question of the Material Base”,PMLA vol. 102, no. 3 (April 1987), p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Theodor Fontane,Effi Briest. Sämtliche Werke IV. München: Carl Hanser, 1963, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. , p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Philippe Hamon,Texte et idéologie. Valeurs, hiérarchies et évaluations dans l'œuvre littéraire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1984, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Balzac,, p. 817.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Balzac,, pp. 865, 851.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Benjamin Harshaw (Hrushovski), “Fictionality and Fields of Reference. Remarks on a Theoretical Framework”,Poetics Today 5: 2 (1984), p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Balzac, pp. 822, 859, 852.

    Google Scholar 

  25. , p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henry H. H. Remak, “Peasant Sentimentalism or Peasant Realism? George Sand'sLa Petite Fadette and Gottfried Keller'sRomeo und Julia auf dem Dorfe”,Beiträge zur Romanischen Philologie XVII (1978), Heft 1, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  27. , p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  28. , p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Georg Lukács,Probleme des Realismus. Berlin: Aufbau, 1955, pp. 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lukács,Probleme des Realismus., p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lukács, “Grenzen des Realismus?“Deutsche Zeitung, 27 February 1939.

  32. Lukács,Der russische Realismus in der Weltliteratur. Berlin: Aufbau, 1952, pp. 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lukács,Der russische Realismus,, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lukács,Der russische Realismus,, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lukács,Probleme des Realismus,, pp. 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nelson Goodman,Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett, 1978, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lukács,Probleme des Realismus, Berlin: Aufbau, 1955, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Роман Якобсон, “О худозественном реализме”, Ladislav Matejka, comp.,Readings in Russian Poetics. Ann Rabor: Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1971, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lukács,Probleme des Realismus,, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nelson Goodman,Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 4th ed. Cambridge, Mass.-London: Harvard UP, 1983, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Philippe Hamon, “Un discours contraint”:Littérature et réalité. Paris: Seuil, 1982, pp. 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jameson,, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wellek,, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jameson, Ithaca, New York: Cornell UP, 1981, p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fontane,, p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fontane,, p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hamon,, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hamon,, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hamon, “Un discours containt”,, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ian Watt,The Rise of the Novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. London: Chatto and Windus, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  51. John Sutherland, “Introduction” to Anthony Trollope:He Knew He Was Right. Oxford-New York: Oxford UP, 1985, p. XVII.

    Google Scholar 

  52. , pp. 363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lukács,Probleme des Realismus,, p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Roland Barthes, “L'effet du réel” in Roland Barthes, Leo Bersani, Philippe Hamon, Michael Riffaterre, Ian Watt:Littérature et réalité, pp. 81–82, 87.

  55. Nicole Mozet,, p. 796.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fontane,, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szegedy-Maszák, M. Notes toward a historical definition of realism. Neohelicon 15, 31–54 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129076

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129076

Keywords

Navigation