Skip to main content
Log in

The paradox of secrecy

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Atman, I.The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territorality, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascom, W.African dilemma tales. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, K. “Wise words” of the western Apache: Metaphor and semantic theory. In K. Basso and H. Selby,Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, B. L.Village of curers and assassins: On the production of Fala Kpelle cosmological categories. The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, B. L. Ethnohermeneutics: On the interpretation of intended meaning in Kpelle accounts. In McCormack & Wurm, (Eds.),Language and mind. The Hague: Mouton, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, B. L. Deep Kpelle: On the interpretation of meaning in adumbrated accounts. In Garfinkel & O'Neill, (Eds.),Studies of naturally organized activities. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, B. L. The social organization of knowledge in Kpelle ritual. In B. Jules-Rosette (ed.),The New Religions of Africa. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp., 1979. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, B. L., & Jules-Rosette, B.A paradigm for looking: Cross-cultural research with visual media. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.Models and metaphor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. Secrecy and solidarity.Sociometry, 1976,39, 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N. J. Middle class communitas: The Fraternal Order of Badgers.Ethos 1974, 2, 4 (Winter), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V.Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: The Free Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. V. “Discourse and Text: Cognitive and Linguistic Press of Social Structure,”Versus. in press.

  • Cohen, A. The politics of ritual secrecy.Man 1974,6 427–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. The dysfunctions of military secrecy.Social Problems 1963,11 (1), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.Intimate relations. New York: The Free Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. W. The mission of metaphor in expressive culture.Current Anthroplogy 1974,15 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, R. The political functions of Poro in Kpelle society.American Anthropologist 1972,74 1218–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freebury, D. R. A psychiatrist moves his office.American Journal of Psychotherapy 1975,29 (4), 567–574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. Conception of and experiments with “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.),Motivation and social interaction. New York: Ronald Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. L., Jr. The Kpelle of Libera. In J. L. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), Peoples of Africa. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. Criminality theories and behavioral images,American Journal of Sociology 1956,61 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, G. W.Notes on the Poro in Liberia. Cambridge, MA: Papers of the Peabody Museum (Vol. 19, No. 2), 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. & Stokes, R. Disclaimers.American Sociological Review 1975,40 (1) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D.Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, R., & Wolfe, M. Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory.Journal of Social Issues 1977, 33 (3), 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, K. The political function of the Poro. In C. Turnbull (Ed.),Africa and social change. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, A. Le secret dans les societies.Analyse and Prevision 1974,18 (4–6), 541–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R. P. Toward a sociology of secrecy and security systems.Social Problems 1972,19(4), 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. M. Chinese secret societies in the Occident: Notes and suggestions for research in the sociology of secrecy.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 1964,1, 2 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, N.Secret societies. London: Aldus Books Ltd., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. A code in the node: The use of a story schema in retrieval.Discourse Processes 1977,2, 1 14–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M. & Johnson, S. N. Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall.Cognitive Psychology 1977,9 111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, S. T. Conceptions of privacy: Current status and next steps.Social Issues 1977,33 (3), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, P.Defining the situation: The organization of meaning in social interaction. New York: Bobbs-Merril Co., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. P.A semantic and logical analysis of Kpelle proverb metaphors of secrecy. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Department of Anthropology, 1976.

  • Pettit, P.The concept of structuralism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponse, B., Secrecy in the lesbian world.Urban Life, 5, 313–338.

  • Rachels, J. “Why Privacy Is Important,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, 4 (Summer):323–333, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P.The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, M.Phenomenology, Language, and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. & Brown, B.The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. “Notes on a Schema for Stories.” In D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins, eds.,Representation and Understanding. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” In David Sudnow, ed.,Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. “Notes on Police Assessment of Moral Character.” In David Sudnow, ed.,Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972 a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. “Everybody Has to Lie.” In Mary Sanches and Ben Blount, eds.,Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanches, M. “Introduction.” In Mary Sanches and Ben Blount, eds.,Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A.The Phenomenology of the Social World. Trans. by G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. London: Heinemann, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. D.Shame, Exposure, and Privacy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. “The Social Psychology of Privacy,”American Journal of Sociology 6:741–752, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science “NSA Slaps Secrecy Order on Inventors' Communications Patent,” Vol. 201, No. 4359 (8 September):891, 893–894, 1978.

  • Shils, E. B.The Torment of Secrecy. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. B. “Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes,”Law and Contemporary Problems 31:281–306, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. “The Secret and the Secret Society.” In K. W. Wolff, ed. and trans.,The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. & Laslett, B. “Privacy and Secrecy: A Conceptual Comparison,”Social Issues 33, 3:43–51, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A.Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. “Mathematical Anthropology.” In John J. Honigmann, ed.,Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology. New York: Rand McNally and Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellman, B.L. The paradox of secrecy. Hum Stud 4, 1–24 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127445

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127445

Keywords

Navigation