Advertisement

Studia Logica

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 335–342 | Cite as

Przegląd czasopism

Artykuły o treści logicznej zawarte w czasopismach nadesłanych do redakcji
  • J. F. Drewnowski
  • Z. Czerwiński
  • M. Kokoszyńska
  • T. Kubiński
  • M. Przełęcki
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. H. Medlin, J. J. C. Smart:Moore's paradox: synonymous expressions and defining.W. D. Glasgow:On choosing.R. Harré:Logic and infralogic.Analysis. Vol. 17, No 6.Google Scholar
  2. G. E. M. Anscombe:Names of words: a reply to Dr. Whiteley.Analysis. Vol. 18, No 1.Google Scholar
  3. J. W. N. Watkins:Farewell to the Paradigm-Case Argument.A. G. N. Flew: „Farewell to the Paradigm-Case Argument”: A comment.J. W. N. Watkins:A reply to Professor Flew's comment.Analysis. Vol. 18, No 2.Google Scholar
  4. P. T. Geach:Imperative and deontic logic.Analysis. Vol. 18, No. 3.Google Scholar
  5. C. A. Campbell:Contradiction: „Law” or „Convention”? H. N. Castaneda:Are conditionals principles of inference? C. B. Martin:Identity and exact similarity.P. Makepeace:Knowing what I mean.R. Harré:Tautologies and the Paradigm-Case Argument.Analysis. Vol. 18, No 4.Google Scholar
  6. M. Polanyi:Problem solving.J. W. N. Watkins:Historical explanation in the social sciences.W. B. Gallie:What makes a subject scientific? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. VIII, No. 30.Google Scholar
  7. E. H. Madden:A logical analysis of „Psychological Isomorphism”.R. P. Gould:The place of historical statements in biology.M. Mandelbaum:Societal laws.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. VIII, No 31.Google Scholar
  8. L. Rieger:A contribution to Gödel's axiomatic set theory.Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal. 7(82), No 3.Google Scholar
  9. H. Freudenthal:Grundzüge eines Entwurfes einer kosmischen Verkehrssprache.Indagationes Mathematicae. Vol. XIX, fasc. 4.Google Scholar
  10. Matsumoto, K. M. Ohnishi, J. Ridder:Die Gentzenschen Schlussverfahren in modalen Aussagenlogiken. I.Indagationes Mathematicae. Vol. XIX, fasc. 5.Google Scholar
  11. J. Ridder:Die Gentzenschen Schlussverfahren in modalen Aussagenlogiken. II, III.Indagationes Mathematicae. Vol. XX, fasc. 1.Google Scholar
  12. A. Adam:The complete induction as an a priori and synthetic statement.Iyyun. Vol. 8, No 4.Google Scholar
  13. L. Henkin:A generalization of the concept of ω — completeness.I. Thomas:Eulerian syllogistic.T. Hailperin:A theory of restricted quantification.I. A. Ehrenfest:Two theories with axioms built by means of pleinasms.H. Putnam:Decidability and essential undecidability.R. M. Smullyan:Languages in which self reference is possible.The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 22, No 1.Google Scholar
  14. T. Hailperin:A theory of restricted quantification. II.N. J. Fine, R. Harrop:Uniformization of linear arrays.K. Bing:On the axioms of order and succession.H. Wang:The axiomatization of arithmetic.R. Friedberg:A criterion for completeness of degrees of unsolvability.S. Feferman:Degrees of unsolvability associated with classes of formalized theories.E. J. Lemmon:New foundations for Lewis modal systems.A. H. Lightstone, A. Robinson:On the representation of Herbrand functions in algebraically closed fields.The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 22, No 2.Google Scholar
  15. L. J. Cohen:Can the logic of indirect discourse be formalized.B. K. Symonds, R. M. Chisholm:Inference by complementary elimination.H. Hiż:Inferential equivalence and natural deduction.A. Ross Anderson:Independent axiom schemata for von Wright's μK. Jaako, J. Hintikka:Vicious circle principle and the paradoxes.W. Craig:Linear reasoning. A new form of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem.W. Craig:Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory.The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 22, No 3.Google Scholar
  16. A. R. White:Truth as appraisal.T. A. Rose:The contradictory function.D. M. Tulloch:The logic of positive terms and the transcendental notion of being.T. McPherson:Finite and infinite.Mind. Vol. LXVI, No 263.Google Scholar
  17. B. K. Milmed:Counterfactual statements and logical modality.H. G. Alexander:Necessary truth. C. K. Grant:Certainty, necessity and Aristotle's sea battle.T. F. Lindley:Professor Shwayder on „=”.P. Hutchings: Anote on Savery's emotive theory of truth.A. Stroll:Uses of analytic statements in ordinary discourse.H. Hochberg:A note on the „Empty Universe”.M. Dummett:Frege's „The Thought”.R. L. Goodstein:L. Wittgenstein, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.P. Alexander:E. H. Hutten, The Language of Modern Physics.Mind. Vol. LXVI, No 264.Google Scholar
  18. S. Hampshire, H. L. A. Hart:Decision, intention and certainty.L. Goddard:„True” and „Provable”.C. M. Myers:The determinate and determinable modes of appearing.H. Palmer:The other logical constant.V. C. Aldrich:Pictorial meaning, picture-thinking, and Wittgenstein's theory of aspects.N. Fleming:A language without singular terms.A. Ross Anderson:A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic.Mind. Vol. LXVI, No. 265.Google Scholar
  19. S. Körner:Reference, vagueness, and necessity.H. P. Grice:Meaning.R. Brown:Inferring from evidence.K. S. Donnellan:A note on the Liar Paradox.The Philosophical Review. Vol. LXVI, No. 3.Google Scholar
  20. R. Hall:One set of positing words.I. H. Stadler On „Seeing as”.J. O. Nelson:Th e confirmation of hypotheses.E. Toms:Reply to a note on the Liar Paradox.The Philosophical Review. Vol. LXVII, No. 1.Google Scholar
  21. P. F. Schmidt:Self-referential justification.A. Pasch:Science, perception, and some dubious epistemological motives.Philosophical Studies. Vol. VIII, No. 4.Google Scholar
  22. K. H. Potter:A query to Mr. Goodman.E. M. Adams:„Ought” again.H. Neri Castaneda;Some nonformal „logical” relations.H. Mason:A note on quasi-dependent emotive meaning.M. Brodbeck:A note on descriptions.Philosophical Studies. Vol. VIII, No 6.Google Scholar
  23. P. F. Strawson:Professor Ayer's „The Problem of Knowledge”.Philosophy. Vol. XXXII, No 123.Google Scholar
  24. Symposium:Logical subjects and physical objects.T. Penelhum:The logic of pleasure.R. B. Brandt:The languages of realism and nominalism.D. R. Price-Williams:Proprioception and personal identity.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. XVII, No 4.Google Scholar
  25. H. W. Johnstone, Jr.:Argument and truth in philosophy.Philosophy and Phenomenogical Research. Vol. XVIII, No 2.Google Scholar
  26. S. Bhattacharyya:The concept of logic.H. Khatchadourian:Common names and „family resemblances”.M. E. Olds:Ostension and analyticity.H. A. Finch:An explication of counterfactuals by probability theory.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. XVIII, No 3.Google Scholar
  27. P. Weiss:Eighteen theses in logic.M. Čapek:The development of Reichenbach's epistemology,R. J. C. Burgener:Price's theory of the concept.The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. XI, No 1.Google Scholar
  28. A. N. Prior: „Opposite Number”.P. Wolff:Necessary and contingent effects.A. J. Bahm:The organicist argument regarding inference beyond experience.The Review of Metaphysics. Vol. XI, No 2.Google Scholar
  29. C. Vasoli:Le „Dialecticae disputationes” del Valla e la critica umanistica della logica aristotelica.Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia. Anno XII, fasc. IV.Google Scholar
  30. P. Facchi:Studi sulla tecnica della persuasione.Rivista die Filosofia. Vol. XLVIII, N. 2.Google Scholar
  31. B. Russell:L'analisi filosofica.Rivista di Filosofia, Vol. XLVIII, N. 3.Google Scholar
  32. A. Visalberghi:Forma logica e contenuto empirico negli enunciati valutativi.L. O. Kattsoff:La semantica della logica.Rivista di Filosofia. Vol. XLVIII, N. 4.Google Scholar
  33. S. Kanger:The Morning Star Paradox.K. Marc-Wogau:Berkeley's sensationalism and the Esse est percipi-principle.K. E. Tranöy:An important aspect of humanism.Theoria. Vol. XXIII, Part 1.Google Scholar
  34. H. Törnebohm:On two logical systems proposed in the philosophy of quantum-mechanics.O. Weinberger:Über die Negation von Sollsätzen.Theoria. Vol. XXIII, Part 2.Google Scholar
  35. V. Kraft:Die Einheit der Wissenschaften.A. Pap:Das empirische Kriterium sinnvoller Sätze.Wiener Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Psychologie, Pädagogik. Bd. V, Heft 1.Google Scholar
  36. П. В. Таванец:О структуре боказательства. Вопросы Философии, 1956/6.Google Scholar
  37. В. А. Фомина:Разработка Г. В. Плехановым вопросов материалистической биалектики. Вопросы Философии, 1957/1.Google Scholar
  38. Д. М. КеБурия:К вопросу о конкретности понятия.Т. А. Броди:Образование и область применимости научных понятий.Г. А. Курсанов:О некоторых концепциях истины в современной ибеалистической гносеологии.П. В. Таванец:О так называемом тавтологическом характере логики. Вопросы философии, 1957/2.Google Scholar
  39. И. В. БлауБерБ:О категориях целого и части в марксистской философии.П. В. Копнин:Диалектика форм мышления в философии Гегеля.Э. В. Ильенков:К вопросу о противоречии в мышлении.И. Б. Новик:О категориях «вещь» и »отношение». Вопросы философии, 1957/4.Google Scholar
  40. Е. К. Войшвилло:Об обной логической концепции. Вопросы философии, 1957/6.Google Scholar
  41. А. А. Ветров:Расчлененность формы как основное свойство понятия.Google Scholar
  42. Т. И. Ойзерман:Диалектический материализм и гегелевская концепция совпабения биалектики, логики и теории познания.Н. И. Стяжкин:О логических парабоксах и их отношении к биалектическим противоречиям. Вопросы философии, 1958/1.Google Scholar
  43. H. Wang:Universal Turing machines: An exercise in coding.K. Schröter:Die Vollständigkeit der die Implikation enthaltenden zweiwertigen Aussagenkalküle und Prädikatenkalküle der ersten Stufe.W. Neumer:Algorithmen für Ordnungszahlen und Normalfunktionen I. K. Härtig:Ein Spezialfall der Substitution als Grundbeziehung der elementaren Semiotik.В. А. Успенский:Несколько замечаний о перечислимых мнжествах.Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik. Bd. 3, Heft 2.Google Scholar
  44. E. Specker:Zur Axiomatik der Mengenlehre (Fundierungs- und Auswahlaxiom).H. Thiele:Vollständigkeit im Stufenkalkül.H. Rohleder:Über eine Theorie einiger Klassen von elektrischen Schaltungen.H. Rohleder:Über die Verwendung eines Aussagenkalküls bei der Synthese von Rechenwerken.G. Klaua:Ein Aufbau der Mengelehre mit transfiniten Typen, formalisiert im Prädikatenkalkül der ersten Stufe.Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik. Bd. 3, Heft 3/4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1958

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Drewnowski
  • Z. Czerwiński
  • M. Kokoszyńska
  • T. Kubiński
  • M. Przełęcki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations