Skip to main content
Log in

Reviews

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. See p. 10. See also p. 59.

  2. See p. 25. See also R. Posner:Commenting. A Diagnostic Procedure for Semantico-Pragmatic Sentence Representations. [in:]Poetics No 5, 1972; published by Mouton, The Hague. Following this English work of the Author, I use German sentences as examples of commenting, since their structure is more natural in this German form of indirect speech than in its English counterpart. The term “Commentor”, not mentioned in the definition, is used at other places in the book.

  3. Section 2.1, p. 56.

  4. See K. Ajdukiewicz:Die syntaktische Konnexität [in:]Studia Philosophica I, Leopoli 1935. See also Y. Bar-Hillel:Decision Procedures for Structure in Natural Languages [in:] Y. Bar-Hillel:Aspects of Language. Jeruzalem, Amsterdam 1970. See also W. J. M. Levelt:Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics (vol. II). Applications in Linguistic Theory. Mouton. The Hague 1974.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Przełęcki, M., Murawski, R. & Marciszewski, W. Reviews. Stud Logica 34, 275–291 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125231

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02125231

Navigation