Combinatorica

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 189–198 | Cite as

Some generalizations of the criss-cross method for the linear complementarity problem of oriented matroids

  • E. Klafszky
  • T. Terlaky
Article

Abstract

Quadratic programming, symmetry, positive (semi) definiteness and the linear complementary problem were generalized by Morris and Todd to oriented matroids. Todd gave a constructive solution for the quadratic programming problem of oriented matroids. Using Las Vergnas' lexicographic extension and Bland's basic tableau construction Todd generalized Lemke's quadratic programming algorithm for this problem.

Here some generalizations of Terlaky's finite criss-cross method are presented for oriented matroid quadratic programming. These algorithms are based on the smallest subscript rule and on sign patterns, and do not preserve feasibility on any subsets. In fact two variants of the generalized criss-cross method are presented. Finally two special cases (oriented matroid linear programming and the definite case) are discussed.

AMS subject classification (1980)

05 B 35 90 C 48 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. L. Balinski andA. W. Tucker, Duality theory of linear programs: A constructive approach with applications,SIAM Review,11 (1969), 347–377.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. M. L. Beale, On quadratic programming,Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,6 (1959), 227–244.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. J. Best, Equivalence of some quadratic programming algorithms,Mathematical Programming,30 (1984), 71–87.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. G. Bland, New finite pivoting rules for the simplex method,Mathematics of Operations Research,2 (1977), 103–107.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. G. Bland, A combinatorial abstraction of linear programming,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,23 (1977), 33–57.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. G. Bland andM. Las Vergnas, Orientability of matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,24 (1978), 94–123.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Y. Y. Chang andR. W. Cottle, Least index resolution of degeneracy in quadratic programming,Mathematical Programming,18 (1980), 127–137.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. W. Cottle, The principal pivoting method of quadratic programming, in:Mathematics of the Decision Sciences Part I. Eds. G. B. Dantzig and A. F. Veinott, Lectures in Applied Mathematics, 11 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, R. I., (1968), 142–162.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. W. Cottle andG. B. Dantzig, Complementary pivot theory of mathematical programming,Linear Algebra and its Applications,1 (1986), 103–125.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. B. Dantzig,Linear programming and Extensions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1963.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Folkman andJ. Lawrence, Oriented matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,25 (1978), 199–236.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    K.Fukuda, Oriented matroid programming,Ph. D. dissertation, University of Waterloo, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    D.Jensen, Coloring and Duality: Combinatorial Augmentation methods,Ph. D. dissertation School of OR and IE, Cornell University, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    E. Keller, The general quadratic optimization problem,Mathematical Programming,5 (1973), 311–337.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E.Klafszky and T.Terlaky, Variants of the „Hungarian Method” for solving linear programming problems,Optimization (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    E.Klafszky and T.Terlaky, Some generalizations of the criss-cross method for quadratic programming,Mathematics of Operations Research (to appear).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Las Vergnas, Bases in oriented matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,25 (1978), 283–289.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Las Vergnas, Convexity in oriented matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,29 (1980), 231–243.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. Lawrence, Oriented matroids and multiply ordered sets,Linear Algebra and its Applications,48 (1982), 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. E. Lemke, Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming,Management Science,11 (1965), 681–689.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    W. D.Morris, Oriented matroids and the linear complementarity problem,Ph. D. thesis. School of OR and IE, Cornell University, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    W. D.Morris and M. J.Todd, Symmetry and positive definiteness in oriented matroids,Cornell University, School of OR and IE, Itacha, Itacha N. Y. Technical Report No.631.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. T. Rockafellar, The elementary vectors of a subspace ofR n, inCombinatorial Mathematics and its Applications, Proc. of the Chapel Hill Conference, 1967 (R. G. Bore and T. A. Dowling, Eds.) 104–127, Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill. 1969.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    K.Ritter, A dual quadratic programming algorithm,Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Mathematics Research Center, Technical Summary Report, No. 2733 (1984).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    C.Roos, On the Terlaky path in the umbrella graph of a linear programming problem,Reports of the Department of Informatics, Delft University of Technology, No. 85-12.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    T. Terlaky, A convergent criss-cross method,Optimization,16 (1985), 5, 683–690.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    T. Terlaky, A finite criss-cross method for oriented matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,42 (1987), 319–327.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    T. Terlaky, A new algorithm for quadratic programming,European Journal of Operations Research,32 (1987), 294–301.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. Terlaky, Onlp programming,European Journal of Operations Research,22 (1985), 70–101.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    M. J. Todd, Complementarity in oriented matroids,SIAM J. Alg. Disc. Math.,5 (1984), 467–485.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. J. Todd, Linear and quadratic programming in oriented matroids,J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B.,39 (1985), 105–133.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    A. W. Tucker, Principal pivotal transforms of square matrices,SIAM Review,5 (1963), 305.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    C. Van de Panne andA. Whinston, The symmetric formulation of the simplex method for quadratic programming,Econometrica,37 (1969), 507–527.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    D. A.Welsh, Matroid theory,Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    P. Wolfe, The simplex method for quadratic programming,Econometrica,27 (1959), 382–398.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Zh. Wang, A finite conformal-elimination-free algorithm for oriented matroid programming,Chinecse Annals of Mathematics,8B. No. 1 (1987).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    H. Whitney, On the abstract properties of linear dependence,Amer. J. Math.,57 (1935), 507–553.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    S. Zionts, The criss-cross method for solving linear programming problems,Management Science,15 (1969), 426–445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Klafszky
    • 1
  • T. Terlaky
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematical InstituteTechnical UniversityMiskolc, Miskolc-EgyetemvárosHungary
  2. 2.Dept. of Op. Res.Eötvös UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations