Matroids algebraic overF(t) are algebraic overF

Abstract

In his thesis [3] M. J. Piff conjectured that a matroid, which is algebraic over a fieldFit) witht transcendent overF, must be algebraic overF. Two proofs have appeared, one by Shameeva [5] and another one by the author [2], but both are unsatisfactory. In this paper I will settle conjecture by applying a theorem of Seidenberg.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    N. Jacobson,Basic Algebra I, Freeman & Co., New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    B. Lindström, A reduction of algebraic representations of matroids,Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 100 (1987), 388–389.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    M. J.Piff, Some problems in combinatorial theory (thesis), Oxford, 1972.

  4. [4]

    A. Seidenberg, Some remarks on Hilbert's nullstellensatz,Archiv der Mathematik 7 (1956), 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    O. V. Shameeva, Algebraic representability. of matroids, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta,Matematika 40 (1985), 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindström, B. Matroids algebraic overF(t) are algebraic overF . Combinatorica 9, 107–109 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02122691

Download citation

AMS subject classification (1980)

  • 05 B 35
  • 12 F 20