Advertisement

The motor nuclei and roots of the cranial and first spinal nerves of vertebrates

Part I. Introduction. Cyclostomes
  • J. L. Addens
Article

Keywords

Public Health Spinal Nerve Motor Nucleus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Addens, J. L. (1928): The eye-muscle nerves of petromyzonts, especially in their general morphological significance. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.31, 733–748.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlborn, F. (1883): Untersuchungen über das Gehirn der Petromyzonten. Z. Zool.39, 191–294Google Scholar
  3. (1884): Über den Ursprung und Austritt der Hirnnerven von Petromyzon. Z. Zool.40, 286–308.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, W. F. (1917): Distribution of the spinal nerves in Polistotrema and some special studies on the development of spinal nerves. J. comp. Neur.28, 137–213.Google Scholar
  5. Allis, E. Phelps (1897): The cranial muscles and cranial and first spinal nerves in Amia calva. J. Morph.12, 487–808.Google Scholar
  6. (1902): The lateral sensory canals, the eye-muscles and the peripheral distribution of certain of the cranial nerves of Mustelus laevis. Quart. J. microsc. Sci.45, 87–236.Google Scholar
  7. Ayers, H. (1894): Bdellostoma dombeyi Lac. Biol. lect. Woods Hole.Google Scholar
  8. Ayers, H. (1921): Vertebrate cephalogenesis. V. Origin of jaw apparatus and trigeminus complex.Google Scholar
  9. : Amphioxus, Ammocoetes, Bdellostoma, Callorhynchus. J. comp. Neur33, 339–404.Google Scholar
  10. : (1930): Amphioxine nerve in Myxinoids. J. comp. Neur.50, 469–478.Google Scholar
  11. Ayers, H., andC. M. Jackson (1901): Morphology of the Myxinoidei. I. Skeleton and musculature. J. Morph.17, 185–226.Google Scholar
  12. Ayers, H., andJ. Worthington (1907): The skin end-organs of the trigeminus and lateralis nerves of Bdellostoma dombeyi. Amer. J. Anat.7, 327–336.Google Scholar
  13. (1908): The finer anatomy of the brain of Bdellostoma dombeyi. I. The acustico-lateral system. Amer. J. Anat.8, 1–16.Google Scholar
  14. (1911): Id. II. The fasciculus communis system. J. comp. Neur.21, 593–617.Google Scholar
  15. Beccari, N. (1913): Sulla spettanza delle fibre del Lenhossék al sistema del nervo accessorio e contributo alla morfologia di questo nervo. Arch. ital. Anat.11, 299–351Google Scholar
  16. (1914): Il IX, X, XI e XII pajo di nervi cranici e i nervi cervicali negli embrioni di Lacerta muralis. Arch. ital. Anat.13, 1–78.Google Scholar
  17. (1921): Studî comparativi sulla struttura del Rombencefalo. Arch. ital. Anat.19, 122–291.Google Scholar
  18. (1923): Intorno al primo differenziamento dei nuclei motori dei nervi cranici. Monit. zool. ital.34, 161–166.Google Scholar
  19. (1931): Terminazioni a cupola e caliciformi nel nucleo del nervo oculomotore dei pesci. Monit. zool. ital.41, 307–313.Google Scholar
  20. Biondi, G. (1910): Osservazioni sullo sviluppo e sulla struttura dei nuclei d'origine dei nervi oculomotore e trochleare nel pollo. Riv. ital. Neuropat.3, 302–327.Google Scholar
  21. Black, D. (1917): The motor nuclei of the cerebral nerves in phylogeny. I. Cyclostomi and Pisces. J. comp. Neur.27, 467–564.Google Scholar
  22. (1917a): Id. II. Amphibia.-Ibid.28, 379–427.Google Scholar
  23. (1920): Id. III. Reptilia.-Ibid.32, 61–98.Google Scholar
  24. (1922): Id. IV. Aves.-Ibid.34, 233–275.Google Scholar
  25. Bok, S. T. (1915): Die Entwicklung der Hirnnerven und ihrer zentralen Bahnen. Fol. neuro-biol.9, 475–565.Google Scholar
  26. Brandis, F. (1893): Untersuchungen über das Gehirn der Vögel. II. Arch. mikrosk. Anat.41, 623–649.Google Scholar
  27. Brouwer, B. (1918): Klinisch-anatomische Untersuchung über den Oculomotoriuskern. Z. Neur.40, 152–193.Google Scholar
  28. Bucy, P. C. (1927): The nictitating membrane and the superior cervical ganglion in the rabbit. J. comp. Neur.43, 221–230.Google Scholar
  29. Butcher, E. O. (1929): The development of the somites in the white rat (Mus norvegicus albinus) and the fate of the myotomes, neural tube and gut in the tail. Amer. J. Anat.44, 381–439.Google Scholar
  30. Cajal, S. Ramon y (1890): Sur l'origine et les ramifications des fibres nerveuses de la moelle embryonnaire. Anat. Anz.5, 85–95 u. 111–119.Google Scholar
  31. (1909): Contribución al estudio de los ganglios de la substancia reticular del bulbo. Trav. Madrid7, 259–284.Google Scholar
  32. Cajal, S. Ramon y (1909–'11): Histologie du système nerveux de l'homme et des vertébrés. 2T. Paris.Google Scholar
  33. Carlson, A. J. (1904): Contributions to the physiology of the heart of the California hagfish (Bdellostoma dombeyi). Z. allg. Physiol.4, 259–288.Google Scholar
  34. (1906): The presence of cardio-regulative nerves in the lampreys. Amer. J. Physiol.16, 230–232.Google Scholar
  35. Castaldi, L. (1922): Note bibliografiche A proposito di alcuni recenti lavori sui nervi oculomotori. Boll. Ocul.1, 1–3.Google Scholar
  36. (1924): Studî sulla struttura e sullo sviluppo del mesencefalo. II. Arch. ital. Anat.21, 172–263.Google Scholar
  37. Clark, W. B. (1906): The cerebellum of Petromyzon fluviatilis. J. Anat. a. Physiol.40, 318–325.Google Scholar
  38. Coghill, G. E. (1913): The primary veraral roots and somatic motor columns of Amblystoma. J. comp. Neur.23, 121–143.Google Scholar
  39. (1929): Anatomy and the problem of behaviour. Cambridge: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  40. Cole, F. J. (1906–1926): A monograph on the general morphology of the myxinoid fishes, based on a study of Myxine. I–VI. Transact. Edinburgh41, 45, 46, 48, 49 and54.Google Scholar
  41. Conel, J. Le Roy (1929): The development of the brain of Bdellostoma stouti. I. J. comp. Neur.47, 343–403.Google Scholar
  42. — (1931): The development of the brain of Bdellostoma stouti. Id. II. Ibid.52, 365–499.Google Scholar
  43. Conrad, R. (1915): Untersuchungen über den unteren Kehlkopf der Vögel. I. Zur Kenntnis der Innervierung. Z. Zool.114, 532–576.Google Scholar
  44. Cords, E. (1924): Zur Frage des M. retractor bulbi der Säuger. Z. Anat.71, 240–260.Google Scholar
  45. (1929): Die Kopfnerven der Petromyzonten.-Ibid.89, 201–249.Google Scholar
  46. Corning, H. K. (1902): Über die vergleichende Anatomie der Augenmuskulatur. Morph. Jb.29, 94–140.Google Scholar
  47. Craigie, E. H. (1928): Observations on the brain of the humming bird. J. comp. Neur.45, 377–481.Google Scholar
  48. Cunningham, D. J. (1881): The relation of nerve-supply to muscle-homology. J. Anat. a. Physiol.16, 1–9.Google Scholar
  49. (1890): The value of nerve-supply in the determination of muscular homologies and anomalies.-Ibid.25, 31–40.Google Scholar
  50. Dahlgren, U., andC. F. Silvester (1906): The electric organ of the stargazer, Astroscopus (Brevoort). Anat. Anz.29, 387–403.Google Scholar
  51. Dawson, J. (1905): The breathing and feeding mechanism of the lampreys. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole.9, 1–21 and 91–111.Google Scholar
  52. Dohrn, A. (1907): Studien zur Urgeschichte des Wirbeltierkörpers. 25. Der Trochlearis. Mitt. zool. Stat. Neapel18, 143–436.Google Scholar
  53. Dorello, P. (1919): Sopra lo sviluppo di alcune formazioni mesencefaliche con speciale riguardo al nucleo rosso nel Sus scrofa. Ric. anat. Roma19, 1–95.Google Scholar
  54. Dücker, M. (1924): Über die Augen der Zyklostomen. Jena. Z. Naturwiss.60, 471–530.Google Scholar
  55. Edgeworth, F. H. (1911): On the morphology of the cranial muscles in some vertebrates. Quart. J. microsc. Sci.56, 167–316.Google Scholar
  56. (1926): On the development of the coraco-branchiales and cucullaris in Scyllium canicula. J. of Anat.60, 298–308.Google Scholar
  57. Favaro, G. (1903): Ricerche intorno allo sviluppo dei muscoli dorsali, laterali e prevertebrali negli amnioti. Arch. ital. Anat.2, 518–577.Google Scholar
  58. Fortuyn, A. B. Droogleever (1912): Notiz über den Eintritt der motorischen Nerven-wurzeln in die Medulla oblongata und über die Lage der motorischen Kerne bei Amia calva L. Fol. neuro-biol.6, 27–30.Google Scholar
  59. Franz, V. (1911): Das intracraniale und intracerebrale Verhalten des Nervus trochlearis bei den Knochenfischen. Anat. Anz.38, 592–598.Google Scholar
  60. Fürbringer, M. (1897): Über die spino-occipitalen Nerven der Selachier und Holocephalen und ihre vergleichende Morphologie. Festschr. Gegenbaur3, 349–788.Google Scholar
  61. (1902): Morphologische Streitfragen. I. Nervus trochlearis. 2. Rabls Methode und Behandlung der Extremitätenfrage. Morph. Jb.30, 85–274.Google Scholar
  62. Fürbringer, P. (1875): Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Muskulatur des Kopfskelets der Cyclostomen. Jena. Z. Naturwiss.9, 1–93.Google Scholar
  63. Gegenbaur, C. (1872): Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. H. 3. Das Kopfskelet der Selachier. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  64. (1887): Die Metamerie des Kopfes und die Wirbeltheorie des Kopfskelets. Morph. Jb.13, 1–114.Google Scholar
  65. (1898): Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. I. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  66. Gehuchten, A. van (1893): Anatomie du système nerveux de l'homme. Leuven: van In.Google Scholar
  67. Goodrich, E. S. (1909): Vertebrata craniata. London: A. and Ch. BlackGoogle Scholar
  68. (1919): On the development of the segments of the head in Scyllium. Quart. J. microsc. Sci.63, 1–30.Google Scholar
  69. (1930): Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. London: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar
  70. Gräper, L. (1913): Die Rhombomeren und ihre Nervenbeziehungen. Arch. mikrosk. Anat., Abt. I.,83, 371–426.Google Scholar
  71. Greene, C. W. (1902): Contributions to the physiology of the California hagfish, Polistotrema stouti. II. The absence of regulative nerves for the systemic heart. Amer. J. Physiol.6, 318–324.Google Scholar
  72. Groebbels, F. (1922): Der Hypoglossus der Vögel. Zool. Jb., Abt. Anat.,43, 465–484.Google Scholar
  73. Hatschek, B. (1892): Die Metamerie des Amphioxus und des Ammocoetes. Anat. Anz.7, Erg.-H., 136–162.Google Scholar
  74. Hatta, S. (1915): On the mesodermic origin and the fate of the so-called mesectoderm in Petromyzon. Proc. roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B88, 457–475.Google Scholar
  75. Herrick, C. J. (1900): A contribution upon the cranial nerves of the codfish. J. comp. Neur.10, 265–316.Google Scholar
  76. (1905): The central gustatory paths in the brains of bony fishes.-Ibid.15, 375–456.Google Scholar
  77. Hoffmann, C. K. (1898): Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Selachii. Morph. Jb.25, 250–304.Google Scholar
  78. Holmgren, N. (1919): Zur Anatomie des Gehirns von Myxine. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.60, Nr 7, 1–96.Google Scholar
  79. Holmgren, N., andC. J. van der Horst (1925): Contribution to the morphology of the brain of Ceratodus. Acta zool.6, 59–165.Google Scholar
  80. Horst, C. J. van der (1918): Die motorischen Kerne und Bahnen in dem Gehirn der Fische, ihr taxonomischer Wert und ihre neurobiotaktische Bedeutung. Tijdschr. nederl. dierk. Ver.16, 168–270.Google Scholar
  81. (1928): A cutaneous branch of the facial nerve in a teleost. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.31, 24–30.Google Scholar
  82. Huber, E. (1931): Evolution of facial musculature and facial expression. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  83. Huber, E., andW. Hughson (1926): Experimental studies on the voluntary motor innervation of the facial musculature. J. comp. Neur.42, 113–163.Google Scholar
  84. Huet, W. G. (1911): Notes on the trochlear and oculomotor nuclei and the trochlear root in the lower vertebrates. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.13, P. 2, 897–903.Google Scholar
  85. Jansen, J. (1930): The brain of Myxine glutinosa. J. comp. Neur.49, 359–507.Google Scholar
  86. Johnston, J. B. (1902): The brain of Petromyzon. Ibid.12, 1–86.Google Scholar
  87. (1905): The cranial nerve components of Petromyzon. Morph. Jb.34, 149–203.Google Scholar
  88. (1908): Additional notes on the cranial nerves of petromyzonts. J. comp. Neur.18, 569–608.Google Scholar
  89. (1908a): A note on the presence or absence of the glossopharyngeal nerve in myxinoids. Anat. Rec.2, 233–239.Google Scholar
  90. (1910): A comment upon recent contributions on the brain of petromyzonts. Anat. Anz.37, 153–158 und 182–194.Google Scholar
  91. Kajava, Y. (1912): Die Kehlkopfnerven und die Arterienbogenderivate beim Lama. Anat. Anz.40, 265–279.Google Scholar
  92. Kappers, C. U. Ariëns (1907): Phylogenetische Verlagerungen der motorischen Oblongatakerne, ihre Ursache und Bedeutung. Neur. Zbl.26, 834–840.Google Scholar
  93. (1908): Weltere Mitteilungen bezüglich der phylogenetischen Verlagerung der motorischen Hirnnervenkerne. Der Bau des autonomen Systems. Fol. neuro-biol.1, 157–172.Google Scholar
  94. (1908a): Weitere Mitteilungen über Neurobiotaxis.-Ibid.1, 507–534.Google Scholar
  95. (1910): The migration of the motor cells of the bulbar trigeminus, abducens and facialis in the series of vertebrates, and the differences in the course of their root-fibres. Verh. Akad. Amsterd., Sect. 2,16, Nr 4, 1–195.Google Scholar
  96. (1912): Weitere Mitteilungen über Neurobiotaxis. VII. Die phylogenetische Entwicklung der motorischen Wurzelkerne in Oblongata und Mittelhirn. Fol. neuro-biol.6, Sommer-Erg.-H., 1–142.Google Scholar
  97. (1917): Further contributions on neurobiotaxis. IX. An attempt to compare the phenomena of neurobiotaxis with other phenomena of taxis and tropism. The dynamic polarisation of the neuron. J. comp. Neur.27, 261–298.Google Scholar
  98. Psych. en neur. Bl.20, 422–452 (1916).Google Scholar
  99. Kappers, C. U. Ariëns (1920–'21): Die vergleichende Anatomie des Nervensystems der Wirbeltiere und des Menschen. I u. II.Google Scholar
  100. (1932): Principles of development of the nervous system (Neurobiotaxis) in “Cytology and cellular pathology of the nervous system” edited by W. Penfield,1, 45–89. New York: P. Hoeber.Google Scholar
  101. Kappers, C. U. Ariëns, undI. Ketjen (1911): Über Zellfärbung in Weigert-Pal- Präparaten und eine Methode zum Studium der Verhältnisse zwischen weißer und grauer Substanz im Zentralnervensystem. Z. Mikrosk.28, 275–278.Google Scholar
  102. Keibel, F. (1928): Beitrage zur Anatomie, zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und zur Stammesgeschichte der Sehorgane des Cyclostomen. Z. mikrosk.-anat. Forsch.12, 391–456.Google Scholar
  103. Koltzoff, N. K. (1902): Entwicklungsgeschichte des Kopfes von Petromyzon planeri. Bull. Soc. Nat. Moscou, Nouvelle sér.15, 259–589.Google Scholar
  104. Kosakai, K., undK. Hiraiwa (1905): Über die Facialiskerne beim Huhn. Jb. Psychiatr.25, 57–69.Google Scholar
  105. Kosaka, K., undK. Yagita (1903): Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Ursprünge des Nervus hypoglossus und seines absteigenden Astes. Ibid.24, 150–189.Google Scholar
  106. Krause, R. (1923): Mikroskopische Anatomie der Wirbeltiere in Einzeldarstellungen. IV. Berlin u. Leipzig: W. de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
  107. Kuhlenbeck, H. (1927): Vorlesungen über das Zentralnervensystem der Wirbeltiere. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  108. Lenhossék, M. von (1890): Über Nervenfasern in den hinteren Wurzeln, welche aus dem Vorderhorn entspringen. Anat. Anz.5, 360–362.Google Scholar
  109. Lesbre, F. X. (1903): Recherches anatomiques sur les camélidés. Arch. Mus. Hist.nat. Lyon8, 1–195.Google Scholar
  110. Lubosch, W. (1899): Vergleichendanatomische Untersuchungen über den Ursprung und die Phylogenese des N. accessorius Willisii. Arch. mikrosk. Anat.54, 514–602.Google Scholar
  111. Mesdag, T. M. (1909): Bijdrage tot de ontwikkelingsgeschiedenis van de structuur der hersenen bij het kipembryo. Diss. Groningen. Groningen: M. de Waal.Google Scholar
  112. Možejko, B. (1924): In „Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs”6, Abt. 1: Pisces, Buch 1. Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsges.Google Scholar
  113. Müller, J. (1838): Vergleichende Neurologie der Myxinoiden. Abh. Akad. Berlin 171–251.Google Scholar
  114. Nakamura, T. (1930): Vergleichend-anatomische Untersuchungen über den sogenannten akzessorischen Abduzenskern. Arb. neur. Inst. Wien32, 262–282.Google Scholar
  115. Neal, H. V. (1897): The development of the hypoglossus musculature in Petromyzon and Squalus. Anat. Anz.13, 441–463.Google Scholar
  116. —: (1914): The morphology of the eye-muscle nerves. J. Morphol.25, 1–188Google Scholar
  117. —: (1918): Neuromeres and metameres. J. Morphol.31, 293–315.Google Scholar
  118. Nishi, S. (1922): Zur Morphologie des M. trapezius. Fol. anat. jap1, 175–181.Google Scholar
  119. — (1922a): Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Augenmuskulatur. Arb. anat. Inst. Sendai H.7, 65–82.Google Scholar
  120. Norris, H. W.(1913): The cranial nerves of Siren lacertina. J. Morphol.24, 245–338.Google Scholar
  121. Osborn, H. F. (1888): A contribution to the internal structure of the amphibian brain. J. Morphol.2, 51–96.Google Scholar
  122. Plate, L. (1922, 1924): Allgemeine Zoologie und Abstammungslehre. I. u. II. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  123. Preziuso, L. (1924): Sul nucleo accessorio del nervo abducente in alcuni uccelli e mammiferi. Nuovo Ercolani, 1–22.Google Scholar
  124. Rauther, M. (1924): In „Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs”6, Abt. 1: Pisces, Buch 1. Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsges.Google Scholar
  125. Röthig, P. (1913): Contributions upon neurobiotaxis (the arrangement of the motor nuclei in Myxine glutinosa, in Cryptobranchus, Necturus, Rana fusca and Bufo). Proc. Akad. Amsterd.16, 296–305.Google Scholar
  126. Röthig, P., andC. U. Ariëns Kappers (1914): Further contributions to our knowledge of the brain of Myxine glutinosa. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.17, 2–12.Google Scholar
  127. Saito, T. (1928): Über die Müllerschen Zellen im Gehirn des japanischen Flußneunauges (Entosphenus japonicus Martens). Fol. anat. jap.6, 457–473.Google Scholar
  128. —: (1930): Über das Gehirn des japanischen Flußneunauges (Entosphenus japonicus Martens). Ibid,8 189–263.Google Scholar
  129. Sanders, E. B. (1929): A consideration of certain bulbar, midbrain, and cerebellar centers and fiber tracts in birds. J. comp. Neur.49, 155–222.Google Scholar
  130. Schalk, A. (1913): Die Entwicklung des Cranial- und Visceralskelets von Petromyzon fluviatilis. Arch. mikrosk. Anat. Abt. I,83, 43–67.Google Scholar
  131. Schilling, K. (1907): Über das Gehirn von Petromyzon fluyiatilis. Abh. Senekenberg. naturforsch. Ges.30, 423–446. (1909).Google Scholar
  132. Schumacher, S. von (1906): Über die Kehlkopfnerven beim Lama (Auchenia lama) und Vieunna (Auchenia vicunna). Anat. Anz.28, 156–160.Google Scholar
  133. Schumacher, S. von (1909): Die segmentale Innervation des Säugetierschwanzes als Beispiel für das Vorkommen einer „Kollateralen Innervation”. Anat. H.40, H. 120, 47–94.Google Scholar
  134. Smith, W. K. (1931): The motor innervation of the superficial facial and superficial cervical musculature of mammals. Anat. Rec.50, 333–353.Google Scholar
  135. Sprenkel, H. Berkelbach van der (1924): The hypoglossal nerve in an embryo of Erinaceus europaeus. J. comp. Neur.36, 219–270.Google Scholar
  136. Stensiö, E. (1927): The Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. Part. I.: Family Cephalaspidae. Norske Vid. Akad. Oslo, Skrifter om svalbard og Nordishavet Nr12. Oslo: J. Dybwad.Google Scholar
  137. Stockard, C. R. (1906): The development of the mouth and gills in Bdellostoma stouti. Amer. J. Anat.5, 481–517.Google Scholar
  138. Stork, H. A. (1932): Zur Homologiefrage der Teleostierpseudobranchie. Zool. Jb., Abt., Anat.,55, 505–554.Google Scholar
  139. Streeter, G. L. (1908): The nuclei of origin of the cranial nerves in the 10mm. human embryo. Anat. Rec.2, 111–115Google Scholar
  140. — (1911): Die Entwicklung des Nervensystems. In Keibel und Mall, Handbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Menschen2, Kap. 14, 1–156. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
  141. Strong, O. S. (1895): The cranial nerves of Amphibia. J. Morphol.10, 101–231.Google Scholar
  142. Tello, J. F. (1923): Les différenciations neuronales dans l'embryon du poulet, pendant les premiers jours de l'incubation. Trav. Madrid21, 1–93.Google Scholar
  143. Terni, T. (1922): Ricerche sul nervo abducente e in special modo intorno al significato del suo nucleo accessorio d'origine. Fol. neuro-biol.12, 277–327.Google Scholar
  144. — (1922a): If sostrato anatomico del riflesso di chiusura della membrana nittitante nei Sauropsidi. Arch. Fisiol.20, 305–311.Google Scholar
  145. Theunissen, W. F. (1914): The arrangement of the motor roots and nuclei in the brain of Acipenser ruthenus and Lepidosteus osscus. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.16, 1032–1041.Google Scholar
  146. Todd, T. Wingate, andC. G. Todd (1912):The sterno- and brachiocephalic muscles and their nerve-supply, with special reference to the Ungulata. Anat. Anz.42, 71–79.Google Scholar
  147. Tretjakoff, D. (1909): Das Nervensystem von Ammocoetes. II. Gehirn. Arch. mikrosk. Anat.74, 636–779.Google Scholar
  148. — (1926): Das Skelet und die Muskulatur im Kopfe des Flußneunauges. Z. Zool.128, 267–304Google Scholar
  149. — (1927): Das periphere Nervensystem des Flußneunauges Ibid.129, 358–452.Google Scholar
  150. — (1929): Der Oculomotorius vom Neunauge. Anat. Anz.68, 225–242.Google Scholar
  151. Tsuchida, U. (1906): Über die Ursprungskerne der Augenbewegungsnerven und über die mit dieser in Beziehung stehenden Bahnen im Mittel- und Zwischenhirn. Arb. hirnanat. Inst. Zürich. H.2, 1–205.Google Scholar
  152. Urra, F. M. (1922): Über die embryonäre Entwicklung des Oculomotoriuskernes. Graefes Arch.107, 123–147.Google Scholar
  153. — (1922a): Alcune semplici osservazioni sullo sviluppo embrionale del nervo patetico. Boll. Ocul.1, 1–15.Google Scholar
  154. Valkenburg, C. T. van (1910): Nucleus facialis dorsalis, nucleus trigemini posterior, nucleus trochlearis posterior. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.13, P. 1, 143–148.Google Scholar
  155. — (1911): Zur Kenntnis der Radix spinalis nervi trigemini. Mschr. Psychiatr.29, 407–437.Google Scholar
  156. — (1912): On the splitting of the nucleus trochlcaris. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.14, P. 2, 1023–1026.Google Scholar
  157. Vermeulen, H. A. (1918): Die Accessoriusfrage. Psych. en neur. Bl.22 (Feetbundel Winkler), 729–742.Google Scholar
  158. Vetter, B. (1874): Untersuchungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Kiemen- und Kiefermuskulatur der Fische. Jena Z. Naturwiss.8, 405–458.Google Scholar
  159. Völker, O. (1908): „Contributions to the knowledge of the development of the occipital region in the gull” (in Czechian). Czech. Acad. Prague II17, 1–47.Google Scholar
  160. Weed, L. H. (1927): Problems of the relations of muscle and nerve. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.40, 117–144.Google Scholar
  161. White, E. G. (1918): The origin of the electric organs in Astroscopus guttatus. Publ. Carnegie Inst. Nr252, 139–172.Google Scholar
  162. Willard, W. A. (1915): The cranial nerves of Anolis carolinensis. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard59,17–116.Google Scholar
  163. Willis, Th. (1664): Cerebri anatome: cui accessit nervorum descriptio et usus. Londini, Typis Tho. Roycroft.Google Scholar
  164. Windle, W. F. (1931): The sensory components of the spinal accessory nerve. J. comp. Neur.53, 115–127.Google Scholar
  165. — (1932): The neurofibrillar structure of the 7 mm. cat embryo Ibid55, 99–138.Google Scholar
  166. — (1932a): The neurofibrillar structure of the five-and-one half-millimeter cat embryo Ibid55, 315–331.Google Scholar
  167. Windle, W. F., andL. C. DeLozier (1932): The absence of painful sensation in the cat during stimulation of the spinal accessory nerve. J. comp. Neur.54, 97–101.Google Scholar
  168. Worthington, J. (1905): Contribution to our knowledge of the myxinoids. Amer. Naturalist.39, 625–663.Google Scholar
  169. — (1905a): The descriptive anatomy of the brain and cranial nerves of Bdellostoma dombeyi.Quart. J. microsc. Sci.49, 137–181.Google Scholar
  170. Zwaardemaker, J. B. (1923): The presence of cardio-regulative nerves in Petromyzon fluviatilis. Proc. Akad. Amsterd.26, 438–442.Google Scholar
  171. Zwaardemaker, J. B. (1923a): Howell's theory of vagus inhibition examined on the regulating nerves of Petromyzon fluviatilis. Proc. XI. Internat. Physiol. Congr. Edinburgh. Quart. J. exper. Physiol., Suppl.-Vol., 242–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag von Julius Springer 1933

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Addens
    • 1
  1. 1.Dutch Central Institute for Brain-ResearchAmsterdam

Personalised recommendations