Summary
Linear planning models of the static type can still play a useful part in allowing to sketch alternative feasible medium-term programs; their reality content will, however, be increased as a function of the integration of correctly specified behavioural relations. It is shown how relations of this type (consumption functions, investment functions) can be embodied in the more technically oriented ‘classical’ models. A second feature planners are interested in, is to know what doses of economic policy will have to be injected into the system in order to reach the targets; some hints as to the degree of spontaneous realization of the targets of a development program might be derived from the implicit dynamics of the static system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldberg, S.,Introduction to Difference Equations, New York, 1958.
Klaassen, L. H. andJ. H. P. Paelinck,Integration of Socio-Economic and Physical Planning, Rotterdam, 1973.
Kuenne, R. E.,The Theory of General Economic Equilibrium, Princeton, 1963.
Nijkamp, P. andJ. H. P. Paelinck,Operational Theory and Method in Regional Economics, Lexington, 1975 (to appear).
Paelinck, J. H. P.,Contribution d l'analyse des systèmes linéaires de dépense, Namur, 1964.
Samuelson, P. A.,Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge (Mass.), 1955.
Solari, L.,Théorie des choix et functions de consommation sémi-agrégées, Modèles statistiques, Genève, 1971.
Tinbergen, J. andH. C. Bos,Mathematical Models of Economic Growth, New York, 1962.
Additional information
A first version of this paper was prepared when the author was visiting Laval University (Quebec, Canada). The author, director of the Netherlands Economic Institute, and Professor at the Faculty of Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, likes to thank his colleague L. B. M. Mennes and two referees for stimulating critical comments; all remaining errors and imperfections are his.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paelinck, J. Simple linear planning models: Structure and implications. De Economist 123, 385–396 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02115745
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02115745