Skip to main content

Rapid detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria by microscopic observation of growth on Middlebrook 7H11 agar

Abstract

The rate of recovery and time to the detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens were measured in traditional egg-based media cultures and on Middlebrook 7H11 agar plate cultures using microcolony detection. In the 5438 specimens processed, a total of 293 (5.4 %) clinically relevant mycobacterial isolates were detected (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n=231;Mycobacterium avium complex, n=60;Mycobacterium kansasii, n=2). Of these, 227 (77 %) and 237 (81 %) isolates were detected on Lowenstein-Jensen medium and Coletsos medium, respectively, and 265 (90 %) isolates were detected on Middlebrook 7H11 plates examined microscopically. The detection time was shorter with the microcolony detection method. While the Lowenstein-Jensen and Coletsos media required an average of 23 and 25 days, respectively, for first detection of mycobacteria, microcolony detection on Middlebrook 7H11 required an average of only 12 days. For acid-fast, stain-positive specimens that were culture positive forMycobacterium tuberculosis, the average interval to positivity was nine days for the microcolony method compared with 20 and 21 days for the Lowenstein-Jensen and Coletsos media, respectively. Microscopic detection on Middlebrook 7H11 agar plates is a rapid, accurate and inexpensive method of detectingMycobacterium tuberculosis and other clinically important mycobacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Raviglione MC, Sudre P, Rieder HL, Spinaci S, Kochi A: Secular trends of tuberculosis in Western Europe. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993, 71: 297–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Narain JP, Raviglione MC, Kochi A: HIV-associated tuberculosis in developing countries: epidemiology and strategies for prevention. Tubercle and Lung Disease 1992, 73: 311–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perronne C: Multiple-drug-resistant tuberculosis: current aspects in industrialized countries, and future strategies. Research in Microbiology 1993, 144: 129–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horsburgh CR, Pozniak A: Epidemiology of tuberculosis in the era of HIV. AIDS 1993, 7, Supplement: 109–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fauville-Dufaux M, Vanfleteren B, De Wit L, Vincke JP, Van Vooren JP, Yates MD, Serruys E, Content J: Rapid detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a 162 bp DNA fragment from antigen 85. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 797–803.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shawar RM, El-Zaatari FA, Nataraj A, Clarridge JE: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by two-step polymerase chain reaction and nonisotopic hybridization methods. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Runyon EH: Identification of mycobacterial pathogens utilizing colony characteristics. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1970, 54: 578–586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vestal AL, Kubica GP: Differential colonial characteristics of mycobacteria on Middlebrook and Cohn 7H10 agar-base medium. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1965, 94: 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Welch DF, Guruswamy AP, Shaw CH, Gilchrist MJR: Implications of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis for clinical laboratories. ASM News 1992, 58: 136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tacquet A, Tison F: Nouvelle technique d'isolement des mycobactéries par le lauryl-sulfate de sodium. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur 1961, 100: 676–680.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abe C, Hosojima S, Fukasawa Y, Kazumi Y, Takahashi M, Hirano K, Mori T: Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 878–881.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirihara JM, Hillier SL, Coyle MB: Improved detection times forMycobacterium avium complex andMycobacterium tuberculosis with the BACTEC radiometric system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 841–845.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah DH, Devdhar MN, Ganatra RD, Kale PN, Virdi SS, Deshmukh MD: Modified rapid radiometric method for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum samples. International Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology 1985, 12: 333–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stager CE, Libonati JP, Siddiqi SH, Davis JR, Hooper NM, Baker JF, Carter ME: Role of solid media when used in conjunction with the BACTEC system for mycobacterial isolation and identification. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1991, 29: 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welch DF, Guruswamy AP, Sides SJ, Shaw CH, Gilchrist MJ: Timely culture for mycobacteria which utilizes a microcolony method. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2178–2184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Idigoras, P., Pérez-Trallero, E., Alcorta, M. et al. Rapid detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria by microscopic observation of growth on Middlebrook 7H11 agar. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 14, 6–10 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112611

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Agar Plate
  • Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
  • Clinical Specimen
  • Rapid Detection