Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Follow-up of 237 patients

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have reviewed retrospectively the results of 237 consecutive patients who underwent microsurgical discectomy for a virgin lumbar disc herniation. Included were 128 (54%) men and 109 (46%) women, with the mean age of 42 years. Intra-operatively, protrusion was found in 60 (25%) patients, prolapse in 127 (54%) patients and sequestration in 50 (21%) patients. The median post-operative follow-up time was 2 years.

During the observation period, sciatic pain had completely recovered or markedly diminished in 218 (92%) patients, and 187 (79%) patients had returned to work. The mean duration of preoperative sciatica was 3.8 months in those patients who finally returned to work. In contrast, it was as long as 6.3 months in those patients who lost their working capacity as a consequence of low back pain. The patients operated on for a prolapse or a sequestrum recovered better than those who underwent surgery for a protrusion. Of the patients operated on for a protrusion, 68% returned to work, while 76% of those operated on for a sequestrum and 85% of those operated on for a prolapse returned to work during the follow-up. Difference was seen also in the occupational outcome: only 37% of the patients operated on for a protrusion reported to manage their work well, while 47% of those with a prolapse and 58% of those with a sequestrum managed well. Surgical complications were in-frequent in this study. Dural tear appeared in 10 (4%) patients and post-operative discitis in 4 (1.7%) patients. Of all patients, 9 (4%) required re-operation for a true recurrent disc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews DW, Lavyne MH (1990) Retrospective analysis of microsurgical and standard lumbar discectomy. Spine 15: 329–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balagura S (1982) Lumbar discectomy through a small incision. Neurosurgery 11: 784–785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui J, Björnsson A, Gillström P (1990) Microsurgery versus standard removal of herniated lumbar disc. Acta Orthop Scand 61: 399–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caspar W (1977) A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 4: 74–77

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier DD, Kretschmer R, Gottfried Y (1991) The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure. Neurosurgery 28: 78–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebeling U, Reichenbach W, Reulen H-J (1986) Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81: 45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fager CA (1986) Lumbar discectomy: a contrary opinion. Clin Neurosurg 33: 419–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frymoyer JW, Hanley E, Howe J, Kuhlmann D, Matteri R (1978) Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Spine 3: 1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goald HJ (1978) Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 147 patients. Spine 3: 183–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goald HJ (1981) Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients. J Microsurg 2: 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12: 933–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Muculloch J (1989) Limited surgical discectomy and microdiscectomy. A clinical comparison. Spine 14: 79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loew F, Caspar W (1978) Surgical approach to the lumbar disc herniations. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 5: 153–174

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacNab I, Guthberg H, Godfrey CM (1977) The incidence of denervation of the sacrospinales muscles following spinal surgery. Spine 2: 294–298

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maroon J, Abla A (1985) Microdiscectomy versus chemonucleolysis. Neurosurgery 16: 644–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salenius P, Laurent LE (1977) Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A survey of 886 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48: 630–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers LA (1988) Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar disc. Neurosurgery 22: 82–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Silvers HR (1988) Microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery 22: 837–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spangfort EV (1972) The lumbar disc herniation. A computeraided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 142: 5–95

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spengler DM (1982) Lumbar discectomy: results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine 7: 604–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stolke D, Sollmann W-P, Seifert V (1989) Intra- and post-operative complications in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 14: 56–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Striffeler H, Gröger U, Reulen H-J (1991) Standard microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. conservative microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 112: 62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teng P (1972) Post-operative lumbar discitis. Los Angeles Neurol Soc 37: 114–123

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomalske G, Galow W, Ploke G (1977) Critical comments on a comparison of two series (1000 patients each) of lumbar disc surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 4: 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas AMC, Afshar F (1987) The microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc protrusion. Follow-up of 60 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69 B(5): 696–698

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weber H (1978) Lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. Part II. J Oslo City Hosp 28: 89–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams RW (1978) Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 3: 175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson DH, Kenning J (1979) Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 4: 137–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson DH, Harbaugh R (1981) Microsurgical and standard removal of the protruded lumbar disc: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 8: 422–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yaşargil MG (1977) Microsurgical operation of the herniated lumbar disc. Adv Techn Stand Neurosurg 4: 81–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland

    E. Kotilainen, S. Valtonen & C. -Å. Carlson

Authors
  1. E. Kotilainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Valtonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. -Å. Carlson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotilainen, E., Valtonen, S. & Carlson, C.Å. Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Follow-up of 237 patients. Acta neurochir 120, 143–149 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112033

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112033

Keywords

Search

Navigation