Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the effects of topical hemostatic agents on the retroperitoneum and ureters of dogs

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of gynecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Retroperitoneal application of microfibrillar collagen hemostat, and oxidized cellulose in surgically dissected ureters failed to induce radiographic or histologic evidence of acute retroperitoneal fibrosis and/or ureteral obstruction in three dogs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cameron WJ (1978) A new topical hemostatic agent in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 51: 118–122

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zucker WH, Mason RG (1978) Ultrastructural aspects of interactions of platlets with microcrystalline collagen. Am J Pathol 82: 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung AF, Menon J, Dillon TF (1978) Acute postoperative retroperitoneal fibrosis and ureteral obstruction secondary to the use of Avitene. Am J Obsted Gynecol 132: 98–909

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman P, Sugar O, Zelaya A (unpubl. observ.) Use of absorbable hemostatic agents and autogenous fat grafts in preventing post-laminectomy scarring.

  5. Cerny JC, Scott T (1971) Non-idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol 105: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sawyer RB, Sawyer KC, Mikolaschek K, Manke WF (1969) Retroperitonitis. Arch Surg 98: 534–538

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masterson BJ (1979) Manual of Gynecologic Surgery, 1st edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magrina, J.F., Masterson, B.J., Cameron, W.J. et al. Study of the effects of topical hemostatic agents on the retroperitoneum and ureters of dogs. Arch. Gynecol. 231, 135–140 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111665

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02111665

Key words

Navigation