Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 265–293 | Cite as

Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences

  • Michele Cascardi
  • Dina Vivian


The present study was designed to evaluate the context of marital violence through husbands' and wives' accounts of the worst violent episode in the year prior to assessment. The primary objective was to examine severity (mild or severe) and gender (husbands or wives) differences in reports of the worst episode of marital aggression using a functional analysis conceptualization. That is, within the specific episode, current stressors, setting events, outcome, and function of aggressive behavior(s) and victimization experiences were evaluated. Sixty-two couples, who presented for marital treatment over a three year period and also reported at least one episode of physical aggression in the past year, participated. In most cases, marital aggression appeared to reflect an outgrowth of conflict between both partners. However, wives consistently reported that their aggressive husbands had engaged in more psychological coercion and aggression than they as a marital conflict escalated to physical violence. Further, there was a tendency for wives to use severe physical aggression in self-defense more often than husbands.

Key Words

marital violence gender violence severity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bowker, L. H. (1983).Beating wife beating. Lexington, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Bradbury, R. N., and Fincham, F. D. (1987). Affect and cognition in close relationships: Towards an integrative model.Cognit. Emotion 1: 59–97.Google Scholar
  3. Bradbury, R. N., and Fincham, F. D. (1989). Attributions in marriage.Psychological Bull. 107:3–34.Google Scholar
  4. Cantos, A., Neidig, P. H., and O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Injuries of women and men in a treatment program for domestic violence.J. Fam. Viol. 9: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cascardi, M., Vivian, D., and Meyer, S. (November, 1991).Context and attributions for marital violence in discordant couples, Poster presented at the 25th Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  6. Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., and Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives.Arch. Intern. Med. 152: 1178–1184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, A., Sullaway, M., and King, C. E. (1983). Systematic error in behavioral reports of dyadic interaction: Egocentric bias and content effects.Behav. Assess. 5: 129–140.Google Scholar
  8. Christian, J., O'Leary, K. D., and Vivian, D. (1994). Depressive symptomatology in maritally discordant men and women: The role of individual and relationship variables.J. Fam. Psychol. 8: 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordova, J. V., Jacobson, N. J., Gottman, J. M., Rushe, R., and Cox, G. (1993). Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 102: 559–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, M., and Wilson, M. (1988).Homicide, Aldene de Gruyter, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Deschner, J. P. (1984).The hitting habit, Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events.Br. J. Criminol. 24: 269–288.Google Scholar
  13. Dutton, D. G., and Strachan, C. E. (1987). Motivational needs for power and spouse specific assertiveness in assaultive and nonassaultive men.Viol. Vict. 2: 145–157.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrensaft, M., and Vivian, D. (1993, November).Spouses' perspectives on marital aggression: Why don't they report it?, Poster presented at the 27th Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  15. Follingstad, D. R., Brennan, A. F., Hause, E. S., Polek, D. S., and Rutledge, L. L. (1991). Factors moderating physical and psychological symptoms of battered women.J. Fam. Viol. 6: 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giles-Sims, J. (1983).Wife Battering: A Systems Theory Approach, Guilford Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Gottman, T. J. (1979).Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., and Vivian, D. (1994). The correlates of spouses' incongruent reports of marital aggression.J. Fam. Viol. 9: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Margolin, G., John, R. S., and Gleberman, L. (1988). Affective responses to conflictual discussions in violent and nonviolent couples.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 554–567.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, D. (1981).Battered Wives. Pocket Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Neidig, P. H., and Friedman, D. H. (1984).Spouse Abuse: A Treatment Program for Couples, Research Press, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  22. O'Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., and Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 263–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Leary, K. D., Vivian, D., and Malone, J. (1992). Assessment of physical aggression in marriage: The need for a multimodal method.Behav. Assess. 14: 5–14.Google Scholar
  24. Pagelow, M. (1984).Family Violence, Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 133–157.Google Scholar
  26. Saunders, D. G. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband abuse or self defense?Viol. Vict. 1: 47–60.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, M. D. (1987). Gender and injury in spousal assault.Social Focus 20: 61–74.Google Scholar
  28. Stets, J. (1988).Domestic Violence and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Stets, J., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.),Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations in 8145 American Families, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  30. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence.J. Marr. Fam. 411: 75–88.Google Scholar
  31. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Books, New York, NY 11794–2500.Google Scholar
  32. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1990).Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations in 8145 American families, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Vivian, D. (1990).The Semi-Structured Marital Interview, Department of Psychology, The University at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Vivian, D., and Langhinrichse-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison.Viol. Vict. 9: 107–124.Google Scholar
  35. Vivian, D., and Malone, J. (1994).Couples at risk for husband-to-wife violence: Screening potential of marital assessment inventories, Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, S.U.N.Y. at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Vivian, D., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987, July).Communication patterns in physically aggressive engaged couples, Paper presented at the Third National Family Violence Research Conference, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
  37. Vivian, D., Smith, D. A., Mayer, F., Sandeen, E., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987, November).Problem-solving skills and emotional styles of aggressive and nonaggressive maritally discordant couples, Poster presented at the 21st Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, L. E. (1983). The battered woman syndrome study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.),The Dark Side of Families, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, L. E. (1984).The Battered Woman Syndrome, Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, L. E. (1989).Terrifying Love: Why Battered Women Kill and How Society Responds, Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Cascardi
    • 1
  • Dina Vivian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of New York at Stony Brook

Personalised recommendations