Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors influencing the cost of chronic low back injuries: An analysis of data from independent medical examinations

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cost factors were examined in 157 patients with work- related spine injuries who were referred to a second opinion program between 1985 and 1991. The independent medical examination (IME) included a history, physical examination, and review of imaging and other studies. Data on demographic variables, litigation, work, injury history, physical examination, and imaging studies were recorded. A standard measure of psychological status (Low Back Pain Symptom Check List) was filled out. The instrument uses pain language as a clinical marker of psychological disturbance linked to a range of conflictual issues such as suppressed anger, burdensome feeling of inferiority, damaged self- esteem, role confusion, abnormal mentation, fear of responsibility or intimacy, gender issues, sexual concerns, disturbing arousal, and the like. Since it relies exclusively on pain language for diagnosis, it does not identify the specific nature of the psychological conflict. Data on treatment, final resolution, and cost were obtained from computerized files of the insurance company. The total cost incurred was $6,551,139. This averaged to $41,727 per case. More expensive cases were associated with a surgical intervention, psychological disturbance, litigation, motor weakness, and positive radiographs. These five variables accounted for 48% of the cost variance. Surgery accounted for 19.9% of the variance and contained the most expensive cases ($68,310 vs. $31,423). Psychological disturbance was detected in 27% of the sample and accounted for 10.5% of the cost variance. Litigation was present in 72% of the cases and accounted for 9.1% of the cost variance. Motor strength and radiographs taken together accounted for 8.4% of the variance. The usefulness of this information was explored from an actuarial and medical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White AA, Gordon SL. Synopsis: Workshop on idiopathic low-back pain.Spine 1982; 7: 141–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson GBJ. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW, ed.The adult spine: Principles and practice. New York: Raven Press, 1991, pp. 107–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenfeld I.Second opinion. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigos SJ, Spengler DM, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A, Wang MH. Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study II. Injury factors.Spine 1986; 11:246–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leavitt F. Detecting psychological disturbance using verbal pain measurement. The Back Pain Classification Scale. In: Melzack R, ed.Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press, 1983, pp. 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leavitt F, Garron DC. The detection of psychological disturbance in patients with low back pain.J Psychosom Res 1979; 23: 149–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leavitt F. Use of verbal pain measurement in the detection of hidden psychological morbidity among low back pain patients with objective organic findings.Psychol & Health 1987; 1: 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McNeill TW, Sinkora G, Leavitt F: Psychologic classification of low-back pain patients: A prognostic tool.Spine 1986; 11: 955–959.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders SH: Cross-validation of the Back Pain Classification Scale with chronic, intractable pain patients.Pain 1985; 22: 271–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Federspiel CF, Guy D, Kane D, Spengler D. Expenditure for non-specific back injuries in the work place.J Occup Med 1986; 31: 919–924.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haddad GH. Analysis of 2932 workers' compensation back injury cases. The impact of cost on the system. Spine 1987; 12: 765–769.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tait, RC, Chibnall JT, Richardson WD. Litigation and employment status: Effects on patients with chronic pain.Pain 1990; 43: 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Talo S, Hendler N, Brodie J. Effects of active and completed litigation on treatment results: Workers' compensation patients compared with other litigation patients.J. Occup Med 1989; 31: 265–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, Graham JD, Hall H, McClulloch JA. Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries.J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 15: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Main CJ, Wood PLR, Hollis S, Spanswick CC, Waddel G. The distress and risk assessment method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome.Spine 1992; 17: 42–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barsky AJ, Bonis JF. Somatization and medicalization in the era of managed care.JAMA 1995; 27: 1931–1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Earman, W.A., Andersson, G.B., Leavitt, F. et al. Factors influencing the cost of chronic low back injuries: An analysis of data from independent medical examinations. J Occup Rehab 6, 5–16 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110391

Key words

Navigation