Variability of isometric and isotonic leg exercise: Utility for detection of submaximal effort
- 36 Downloads
A number of studies have investigated the use of variability measures in the detection of submaximal or insincere efforts in strength testing. The underlying assumption of these approaches is that submaximal efforts will be more variable than maximal efforts. Previous studies have investigated the variability of torque production in isometric or isokinetic tasks with mixed results. The present study investigated the variability of torque production and velocity in isometric and isotonic leg extension tasks, respectively. Fifteen asymptomatic subjects participated in a within-subject counterbalanced design in which they were asked to perform maximally and submaximally in both isometric and isotonic leg extension tasks. Results indicated that both isometric and isotonic tasks showed greater variability (measured by coefficient of variation) in the submaximal effort condition. However, the sensitivity to detect submaximal efforts was much greater for the isotonic velocity variability condition. It was concluded that the isotonic approach showed promise for clinical application, but that the isometric task had unacceptably poor classification rates, consistent with previous research.
Key wordseffort variability strength testing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Webster BS, and Snook SH. The cost of 1989 worker's compensation low back pain claims.Spine 1984; 19: 1011–1016.Google Scholar
- 2.Niemeyer LO, Matheson LN, Carlton RS.Indust Rehabil Quart 1989; 2: 5.Google Scholar
- 5.Hazard R, Reid S, Fenwick J, Reeves V. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: Variability as an indicator of effort.Spine 1988; 13: 55–57.Google Scholar
- 11.Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA. The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions.J Motor Behav. 1980; 12: 75–89.Google Scholar
- 12.Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. The force/force-variability relationship under controlled temporal conditions.J Motor Behav 1988; 20: 106–116.Google Scholar
- 13.Carlton LG, Newell KM. Force variability and movement accuracy in space-time.J Exp Psychol 1988; 14: 24–36.Google Scholar
- 14.Newell KM, Carlton LG, Hancock PA. Kinetic analysis of response variability.Psychol Bull 1984; 1: 133–151.Google Scholar
- 15.Newel KM, Carlton LG. Force variability in isometric responses.J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1988; 1: 37–44.Google Scholar