Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Effects of work and rest on upper extremity signs and symptoms of workers performing repetitive tasks

  • Christine A. Feely
  • Mary K. Seaton
  • Cynthia L. Arfken
  • Dorothy F. Edwards
  • V. Leroy Young
Article

Abstract

The temporal relationship between work and signs and symptoms of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among workers at risk is relatively unexplored. The study focused on changes in upper extremity circumference, volume, sensory threshold, and reported symptoms after work and rest. All workers (N=50) performed a repetitive poultry processing task and had exhibited upper extremity signs and symptoms in baseline testing prior to this study. These workers manifested significantly increased upper extremity circumference following a period of rest, with circumferences decreasing during work. Upper extremity volume and reported swelling also decreased during work. Reports of tenderness were significantly greater after work than after rest, while reports of pain were greatest after a short rest interval. Results show that the signs and symptoms observed in these workers were manifestations of occupational cumulative trauma and that further study of the relationship between work and signs and symptoms is needed.

Key words

musculoskeletal disorders upper extremity repetitive work 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong TJ, Foulke JA, Joseph BS, Goldstein SA. Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982; 43: 103–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Higgs P, Young VL, Seaton MK, Edwards, DF, Feely CA. Prevalence of upper extremity impairment in workers performing repetitive tasks.J Plas Reconstruct Surg 1992; 90: 614–620.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Young VL, Seaton MK, Feely CA, Arfken C, Edwards DF, Baum CM, Logan S. Detecting cumulative trauma disorders in workers performing repetitive tasks.Am J Indus Med 1995: 27: 419–431.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Finkel ML. The effects of repeated mechanical trauma in the meat industry.Am J Indus Med 1985; 8: 375–379.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roto P, Kivi P. Prevalence of epicondylitis and tenosynovitis among meat cutters.Scand J Work Environ Health 1984; 10: 203–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lutz G, Hansford T. Cumulative trauma disorder controls: The ergonomics program at Ethicon, Inc.J Hand Surg 1987; 12: 863–866.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cannon LJ, Bernacki EJ, Walter, SD. Personal and occupational factors associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.J Occup Med 1981; 23: 255–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferguson D. Repetition injuries in process workers.Med J Aust 1971; 2: 408–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Stetson D. Hand-wrist disorders among investment casting plant workers.J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 838–844.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feldman RG, Travers PH, Chiroco-Post J, Keyserling WM. Risk assessment in electronic assembly workers: Carpal tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 849–855.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Punnett L, Robins JM, Wegman DH, Keyserling WM. Soft tissue disorders in the upper limbs of female garment workers.Scand J Work Environ Health 1985; 11: 417–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Punnett L. Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in hospital workers.J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 858–862.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vihma T, Nurminen M, Mutanen P. Sewing-machine operators' work and musculo-skeletal complaints.Ergonomics 1982; 25: 295–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wehrle JH. Chronic wrist injuries associated with repetitive hand motions in industry. Occupational Health and Safety Technical Report, Dept. of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Margolis W, Kraus JF. The prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms in female supermarket checkers.J Occup Med 1987; 29: 953–956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith MJ, Cohen BGF, Stammerjohn LWJr. An investigation of the health complaints and job stress of video display operators.Human Factors 1981; 23: 387–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oxenburgh MS, Rowe SA, Douglas DB. Repetition strain injury in keyboard operators.J Occup Hlth Safety—Aus & New Zealand 1985; 1: 106–112.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Braun RM, Davidson K, Doehr S. Provocative testing in the diagnosis of dynamic carpal tunnel syndrome.J Hand Surg 1989; 14A: 195–197.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Hand-wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry.Br J Indus Med 1986; 43: 779–784.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seaton MK, Groszewski, P, Feely C, Logan SE. Biomechanical demands of a repetitive task performed by poultry processors. Proceedings of the American Society of Hand Therapists,J Hand Ther 1993; 6: 55–56.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beach RB. Measurement of extremity volume by water displacement.Phys Ther 1977; 57: 286–287.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    DeVore GL, Hamilton GF. Volume measuring of the severely injured hand.Am J Occup Ther 1968; 22: 16–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eccles MV. Hand volumetrics.Brit J Phys Med 1956; 5–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Engler HS, Sweat RD. Volumetric arm measurements: Technique and results.Am Surg 1962; 28: 465–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kettle JH, Rundle FF, Oddie TH. Measurement of upper limb volumes: A clinical method.Aust NZ J Surg 1957; 27: 264–270.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Waylett-Randall J, Seibly DS. A study of the accuracy of a commercially available volumeter.J Hand Ther 1991; 4: 10–13.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stone JH. Impairment level evaluations: Sensibility. In:Clinical assessment recommendations (2nd Ed). USA: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992, pp. 71–73.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osterman AL, Aversa BA, Greenstein D. Use of the Nervepace Electroneurometer as an effective screening tool in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scientific exhibit, Am Soc Surg Hand, Seattle, Washington, 1989.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosier RN, Blair WF. Preliminary clinical evaluation of the digital electroneurometer.Biomed Sci Instr 1984; 20: 55–62.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    SAS Institute Inc.SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, Version 6 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elkins EC, Herrick JF, Grindlay JH, Mann FC, De Forest RE. Effect of various procedures on the flow of lymph.Arch Phys Med Rehab 1953; 34: 31–39.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guyton AC. Basic human physiology: Normal function and mechanisms of disease (2nd Ed). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    McGough CE, Zurwasky ML. Effect of exercise on volumetric and sensory status of the asymptomatic hand.J Hand Ther 1991; 4: 177–180.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine A. Feely
    • 3
  • Mary K. Seaton
    • 3
  • Cynthia L. Arfken
    • 1
  • Dorothy F. Edwards
    • 3
  • V. Leroy Young
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Health Behavior ResearchWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis
  2. 2.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis
  3. 3.Program in Occupational TherapyWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations