Abstract
Kossowski and Kriele derived boundary conditions on the metric at a surface of signature change. We point out that their derivation is based not only on certain smoothness assumptions but also on a postulated form of the Einstein field equations. Since there is no canonical form of the field equations at a change of signature, their conclusions are not inescapable. We show here that a weaker formulation is possible, in which less restrictive smoothness assumptions are made, and (a slightly different form of) the Einstein field equations are satisfied. In particular, in this formulation it is possible to have a bounded energy-momentum tensor at a change of signature without satisfying their condition that the extrinsic curvature vanish.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kossowski, M., and Kriele, M. (1993).Class. Quantum Grav. 10, 2363.
Ellis, G. F. R., Sumeruk, A., Coule, D., and Hellaby, C. (1992).Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 1535; Ellis, G. F. R. (1992).Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 1047.
Hellaby, C., and Dray, T. (1994).Phys. Rev. D 49, 5096; Dray, T., and Hellaby, C. (1994).J. Math. Phys. 35, 5922.
Dray, T. (1995). “Einstein's Equations in the Presence of Signature Change,” to appear inJ. Math. Phys.
Embacher, F. (1995).Phys. Rev. D 51, 6764.
Dray, T., Hartley, D., Tucker, R. W. and Tuckey, P. (1995). “Tensor Distributions in the Presence of Signature Change.” University of Adelaids Preprint nr. ADP 95-44/M37.
Hellaby, C., and Dray, T. (1995).Phys. Rev. D 52, 7333.
Dray, T., Manogue, C. A., and Tucker, R. W. (1993).Phys. Rev. D 48, 2587.
Hayward, S. A. (1992).Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 1851,2543 (erratum).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dray, T., Hellaby, C. Comment on “smooth and discontinuous signature change in general relativity”. Gen Relat Gravit 28, 1401–1407 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109530
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109530