Skip to main content
Log in

Stagnation and the inverted Haavelmo effect: Some international evidence

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Neither monetarists, nor Keynesian nor new classical economists analyse balanced-budget financing in a way justified by the facts. This paper tries to bridge this gap somewhat. Balanced-budget multipliers are analysed for Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the U.S.A. with empirical models based on a synthesis of supply and demand. It is shown that for these countries neither the classical balanced-budget multiplier of zero, nor the positive Keynesian one is valid, but rather a negative balanced-budget multiplier. This negative multiplier is called the inverted Haavelmo effect, because its policy implications reach further than the traditional Keynesian and classical contentions on balanced-budget financing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R.J. (1980), ‘Federal Deficit Policy and the Effects of Public Debt Shocks,’Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12, nr. 4, part 2, pp. 747–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1981),Money Expectations, and Business Cycles, Essays in Macroeconomics, New York.

  • Beld, C.A. van den (1968),A Macro Model for the Dutch Economy, C-E-I-R, Model Building Symposia (March), New York.

  • Brandsma, A.S. and N. van der Windt (1983), ‘Wage Bargaining and the Phillips-Curve: A Macroeconomic View,’Applied Economics, 15, pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, M. (1981), ‘The Balanced-Budget Multiplier by the Back Door in a Tax-Revolt Context,’Kyklos, 34, Fasc. 2, pp. 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, G.A. (1980), ‘Tax-Financed Government Spending in a Neoclassical Model with Sticky Wages and Rational Expectations,’Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. (1981), ‘Taxation, Real Wage Rigidity and Employment,’Economic Journal, 91, pp. 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicks-Mireaux, L.A. and J.C.R. Dow (1959), ‘The Determinants of Wage Inflation: United Kingdom, 1946–1956,’Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 122, pp. 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dréze, J.H. and F. Modigliani (1981), ‘The Trade-Off between Real Wages and Employment in an Open Economy (Belgium),’European Economic Review, 15, pp. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. and G. Fromm (1968), ‘The Price Equation,’American Economic Review, 58, pp. 1159–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.K., (1980) The Bankruptcy of Keynesian Econometric Models,’Challenge, January–February, pp. 13–19.

  • Evans, M.K. (1981), “An Econometric Model Incorporating the Supply-Side Effects of Economic Policy,’ in: L.H. Meijer (ed.),The Supply-Side Effects of Economic Policy, Boston/The Hague/London, pp. 33–80.

  • Friedman, B.M. (1978), ‘Crowding Out or Crowding In? Economic Consequences of Financing Government Deficits,’Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, pp. 593–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and R.D. Friedman (1979),Free to Choose, a Personal Statement, New York.

  • Haavelmo, T. (1945), ‘Multiplier Effects of a Balanced Budget,’Econometrica, 13, pp. 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. and M. Timbrell (1973), ‘Empirical Tests of a Bargaining Theory of Wage Rate Determination,’The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, June, nr. 2, pp. 141–167.

  • Johnston, J. (1974), ‘A Model of Wage Determination under Bilateral Monopoly,’ in: D. Laidler and D.L. Purdy (eds.),Inflation and Labour Markets, Manchester/Toronto and Buffalo, pp. 61–78.

  • Ketellapper, R.H. and E. Osinga (1981), ‘De Balanced Budget Multiplier in Macro-Economische Modellen,’Maandschrift Economce, 45, pp. 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L.R. (1978), ‘The Supply-Side,’American Economic Review, 68, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klundert, T. van de (1982), ‘Distribution, Taxation and Employment in an Open Economy,’De Economist, 130, pp. 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. (1979), ‘On Monetary and Fiscal Policy in an Open Economy,’De Economist, 127, pp. 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. (1980),Over geld en economische Politiek, Leiden/Antwerpen.

  • Knoester, A. and J. van Sinderen (1980), ‘Over de monetaire gevolgen van de betalingsbalans,’Maandschrift Economie, 44, pp. 145–174. A completely revised English version of this article has been published as discussion paper 8217 G/M,Money, the Balance of Payments and Economic Policy, Institute for Economic Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. and J. van Sinderen (1982), ‘Economic Policy and Employment,’ Discussion paper nr. 8201, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, Published in: A. Maddison and B.S. Wilpstra (eds.),Unemployment: the Dutch Perspective, Ministry for Social Affairs and Employment, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. and N. van der Windt (1983),Real Wages and Shifting Forward in Eight OECD Countries, Discussion paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoester, A. (1983),Stagnation and the Inverted Haavelmo Effect: Some International Evidence, Discussion paper nr. 8301, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffer, A.B. (1980),The “Ellipse”: An Explication of the Laffer Curve in a Two Factor Model, California.

  • Laidler, D. and P. O'Shea (1980), ‘An Empirical Macro-Model of an Open Economy under Fixed Exchange Rates: The United Kingdom, 1954–1970,’Economica, 47, pp. 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1977),The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered, Oxford.

  • Musgrave, R.A. and P.B. Musgrave, (1982),Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 3rd. ed., London.

  • OECD (1978),Public Expenditure Trends, Paris.

  • Pen, J. (1980),Modern Economics, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.

  • Pen, J. and L.J. van Gemerden (1977),Macro-economie, Utrecht/Antwerp.

  • Phillips, A.W. (1958), ‘The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957,’Economica, 25, pp. 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817),Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Edited with an introduction by R.M. Hartwell (1971), Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.

  • Stein, J. L. (1982),Monetarist, Keynesian and New Classical Economics, Oxford.

  • Tinbergen, J. (1982), ‘De noodzaak van een synthese,’Economsch-Statistische Berichten, 67, pp. 1284–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1980),Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity, Oxford.

  • Tobin, J. (1981), ‘Comment on Albert Ando “On an Theoretical and Empirical Basis of Macroeconomic Models”,’ in: J. Kmenta and J.B. Ramsey (eds.),Large-Scale Macro-Econometric Models, Amsterdam/New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to Nico Boot, Wim Groot and Jarig van Sinderen for their able assistance and to Peter de Boer and Bert Greve for their accurate provision of the data. Helpful comments were received from members of the Directorate for General Economic Policy and from Professors J. Pen, Th.A. Stevers and J. Tinbergen. A background version of this article — containing more data, the coefficients and a detailed description of the supply side in the four models used — is available on request referring to A. Knoester (1983).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knoester, A. Stagnation and the inverted Haavelmo effect: Some international evidence. De Economist 131, 548–584 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02109409

Keywords

Navigation