Skip to main content
Log in

Urethrocystometry as a routine method for the objective evaluation of women with urinary incontinence

  • Published:
Archives of gynecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Over a 2-year period, 401 patients with urinary incontinence were examined at the Women's Clinics in Lund and Malmö and then investigated by urethral pressure profile measurement and simultaneous urethrocystometry. After full investigation the patients could be classified as follows: 214 (53.4%) had genuine stress incontinence, 48 (12.0%) had genuine urge incontinence, 41 (10.2%) had mixed incontinence, 20 (5.0%) had urgency-frequency, 6 (1.5%) had neurogenic incontinence, 9 (2.2%) had incontinence of uncertain aetiology, and 63 (15.7%) of the patients were apparently continent with normal urethral pressure profiles and urethrocystometrograms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey KV (1956) A clinical investigation into uterine prolapse with stress incontinence. Treatment by modified Manchester colporhaphy, Part II. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 63: 663

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates CP, Whiteside CG, Turner-Warwick R (1970) Synchronus cinepressureflowcystourethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence. Br J Urol 42: 714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drutz HP, Schapiro BJ, Mandel F (1978) Do static cystourethrograms have a role in the investigation of female incontinence? Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fantl JA, Hurt WG, Dunn LJ (1977) Dysfunctional detrusor control. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129: 229

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenwald SW, Thronbury JR, Dunn LJ (1967) Cystourethrography as a diagnostic aid in stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 129: 324

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Continence Society (1976) First Report on Standardization of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function. Br J Urol 48: 39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffcoate TNA, Roberts H (1952) Observation of stress incontinence of urine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 64: 721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis DS (1979) Carbon Dioxide versus electronic urethrocystometry for the detection of detrusor dyssynergia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordling J, Hebjorn S, Walter S, Hald T, Christiansen HD (1978) A comparative study of water cystometry and CO2 cystometry. Urol Int 33: 60

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanton LS (1978) Stress urinary incontinence — preoperative investigation and diagnosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 21: 3 IX

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ulmsten U, Asmussen M, Lindström K (1975) A new technique for simultaneous urethrocystometry including measurements of the urethral pressure profile. I.C.S. 5th Annual Conference, Glasgow

  12. Ulmsten U, Andersson KE, Persson CGA (1977) Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of urge incontinence in women. Urol Int 32: 88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iosif, S., Henriksson, L. & Ulmsten, U. Urethrocystometry as a routine method for the objective evaluation of women with urinary incontinence. Arch. Gynecol. 230, 41–47 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108597

Key words

Navigation