Skip to main content
Log in

“The unbearable embeddedness of being”: Self psychology, intersubjectivity and large group experiences

  • Published:
Group

Abstract

Studying the large group from a self psychological perspective is a new area of exploration. The purpose of this work is to consider an expansion of the selfobject concept to include experiences in group. The groupobject is conceived as a function which addresses the inherent group needs of the individual. Just as the selfobject serves to fill in missing aspects of the self, the groupobject fills in missing aspects of the group self. The development of this concept emerged from an ongoing large group experience. It has its roots in the idea that effective group treatment can result from the recognition and support of groupobject as well as selfobject needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agazarian, Y. and Carter, F. (1993). Discussions on the Large Group.Group 17: 210–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacal, H. (1985). Optimal responsiveness and the therapeutic process. In:Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. A. Goldberg. New York: Guilford, pp. 202–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B. (1994).Advances in Infant Research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Institute of Contemporary Psychotherapy, Washington, DC.

  • Beebe, B. and Lachmann, F. (1994). Mother-infant mutual influence and precursors of psychic structure. In A. Goldberg (Ed.),Frontiers in Self Psychology: Progress in Self Psychology, Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. (1992). Some practical implications of a social—constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation.Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1976). Creativeness, charisma, group psychology. In P. Ornstein (Ed.),The Search for the Self, Vol. 2. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1978, pp. 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1977).The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984).How Does Analysis Cure? A. Goldberg (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundera, M. (1984).The Unbearable Lightness of Being: A lover's story. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S.H. (1975/1994). Problems of the large group from a group analytic point of view. In L. Kreeger (Ed.)The Large Group (pp. 33–56). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (1988).Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgen, T. (1994).The Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, M. (1994).Group Analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Group Psychotherapy Conference, Washington, DC.

  • Segalla, R.A. (1985). Applications of Self Psychological Principles to Group Psychotherapy. Presented to The Washington School of Psychiatry Philosophy of Psychotherapy Seminar, Washington, DC.

  • Segalla, R. A. (1995). The Evolution of the Self Psychological Perspective of Group Psychotherapy. Presented at The National Group Psychotherapy Training Institute, Washington, DC.

  • Segalla, R., Silvers, D., Wine, B. and Pillsbury, S. (1988). Multiple Selfobjects: Experiences in Group and Couples Treatment. Presented at the 11th Annual Conference on the Psychology of the Self, Washington, DC.

  • Segalla, R., Silvers, D., Wine, B. and Pillsbury, S. (1989). Clinical Applications of a Multiple Selfobject Perspective in Group and Couples Treatment. Presented at the 12th Annual Conference on the Psychology of the Self, San Francisco, CA.

  • Stolorow, R., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. (1987).Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. and Atwood, G. (1992).Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trop, J. (1994). Self Psychology and Intersubjectivity Theory. In Stolorow, Atwood and Brandchaft (Eds.),The Intersubjective Perspective. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson, Inc., 1994, pp. 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turquet, P.M. (1974). Leadership—the individual in the group. In G.S. Gibbard, J.J. Harlman and R.D. Mann (Eds.),Analysis of Groups.

  • Turquet, P.M. (1975). “Threats to identity in the large group.” In L.C. Kreeger (Ed.),The Large Group Dynamics and Therapy. London, Constable: 87–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1988).Treating the Self. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This phrase, first coined by Stolorow and Atwood (1993) represents their attempt to clarify the fallacy of the isolated mind.Contexts of Being. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1993.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segalla, R.A. “The unbearable embeddedness of being”: Self psychology, intersubjectivity and large group experiences. Group 20, 257–271 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108585

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108585

Key words

Navigation