Abstract
This paper presents the results of a national survey of states mental health authorities regarding the use of unique client identifiers (UCI). Results indicate that 78% of respondents used some UCI, and all used one or more of three types of UCIs, i.e., an existing number, a constructed identifier, or an assigned number. Issues concerning the purpose of use, implementation, barriers and problems with the different UCIs are discussed in order to help state and local authorities make informed policy decisions regarding the selection and implementation of a unique identifier in mental health data systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
California Department of Mental Health, Linkage Technology Work Group. (1991).Oversight Committee proposal Sacramento, CA: Author.
Connecticut Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission. (1991, January).Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission client information needs analysis: Conceptual design, final report. Hartford, CT: Author.
Issues in patient tracking. (1987). In L.J. Kline & C. Coppelo (Eds.),Proceedings MSIS Tenth National Users Group.
Leginski, W.A., Croze, C., Driggers, J., Dumpman, S., Geertsen, D., Kamis-Gould, E., Namerow, M.J., Patton, R.E., Wilson, N.Z., & Wurster, C.R. (1989).Data standards for mental health decision support systems (DHHS Publication No. ADM 89-1589). Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
Smith, R.E., & Sulanowski, J.S. (Eds.). (1992).Compilation of state and federal privacy laws. Providence, RI: Privacy Journal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was partially supported by National Institute of Mental Health Technical Assistance funds. Earlier versions were presented at the Annual Conference on Mental Health Statistics, June 1992, and at the Southern Regional Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program, September 1992. Other members of the work group were Sally Anderson (Texas), Lawrence E. Stivers (Florida), Regis Parsons (South Carolina), and Jacky Stancil (Alabama).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minsky, S., Lloyd, P. The use of unique client identifiers in state mental health service systems. Adm Policy Ment Health 23, 231–252 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108322
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108322