Advertisement

International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 385–396 | Cite as

Homologous ureter grafts

Experimental studies
  • J. Darewicz
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Artificial ureter defects in dogs were replaced by homologous ureter grafts. Twenty-four experiments were carried out. The grafts without being necrotized underwent a certain reconstruction. Good functional and anatomical results were obtained in 11 cases. Fibrosis in the walls resulted in a slight reduction of the lumen and a shrinkage of the graft without any significant interference with the function of the ureter. These results indicate that the homologous graft is of value in experimental replacement of defects in the urether.

Keywords

Public Health Shrinkage Slight Reduction Significant Interference Experimental Replacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamkiewicz, K., Ginko, T., Grzbiela, J., Wieczorek, M.: Zastępowanie ubytków moczowodów własnymi przeszczepami moczowodowymi.Pol. Przegl. Chir., 36, 567 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harvard, B. M., Camilleri, J. A., Nagid, P. W., Glenn, J. F.: Experimental transplantation of freeze-dried homologous and autologous ureteral segments.J. Urol. 84, 385 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horton, Ch., Politano, V.: Ureteral reconstruction with split skin grafts: an experimental study.Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 15, 261 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kocvara, S., Żak, F.: Ureteral substitution with dacron and teflon prostheses.J. Urol. 88, 365 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lord, J. W., Stefko, P. L., Stevans, A. R.: On bridging a gap in the ureter by means of a free fascial transplant over a straight vitallium tube; an experimental study.J. Urol. 49, 249 (1943).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marosz, T., Mebel, L., Zakariasz, Z., Mesarosz, J.: K waprosu o płasticzeskom zamieszczeni moczetocznika fallopiewoj truboj.Urołogija 2, 7 (1960).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ngo-Gia-Hy, Tang-Nhiep, Nguyen-Dienh-Hao, Nguyen-Thanh-Tra, Vu-Nguyen-Bich: Homograftes de l'uretère. Travail experimental.J. d'Urolog. 72, 383 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popow J., Darewicz, J.: Zmiany histomorfologiczne w przeszczepionych moczowodach u psów.Pol. Przegl. Chir. 43, 955 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosenberg, M. L., Dahlen, G. A.: Autogenous vein grafts and venous valves in ureteral surgery: an experimental study.J. Urol. 70, 434 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Warren, J. W., Coomer, T., Fransen, H.: The use of teflon grafts for replacement of ureters.J. Urol. 89, 164 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weaver, R. G., Henderson, J. H.: Ureteral regeneration: experimental and clinical.J. Urol. 72, 350 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wesołowski, S.: Uzupełnienie ubytku moczowodu pętlą jelita krętego.Pol. Tyg. Lek. 9, 979 (1954).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wesołowski, S.: Uzupełnienie ubytku moczowodu wyrostkiem robaczkowym.Pol. Przegl. Chir. 41, 496 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Darewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Thoraco-Surgical Department of the Institute of SurgeryBiałystok Medical SchoolBiałystokPoland

Personalised recommendations