Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical and structural studies onAcinetobacter calcoaceticus RAG-1 and MR-481—Two standard strains in hydrophobicity tests

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acinetobacter calcoaceticus RAG-1 and MR-481, two standard strains used in microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons (MATH), were characterized by contact angles, pH-dependent zeta potentials, elemental surface composition by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and molecular composition by infrared spectroscopy (IR). Negatively stained (methylamine tungstate) and ruthenium red-stained cells were studied by transmission electron microscopy to reveal the absence or presence of surface appendages. Despite the fact thatA. calcoaceticus RAG-1 is known to be extremely hydrophobic in MATH, whereas MR-481 is a completely non-hydrophobic mutant, neither XPS nor IR indicated a significant difference in chemical composition of the cell surfaces. Contact angles with polar liquids, water and formamide, were considerably higher on RAG-1 than on MR-481, in accordance with their relative hydrophobicities as measured by MATH. However, no significant differences in contact angles were observed between the two strains with apolar liquids like diiodomethane,α-bromonaphthalene, and hexadecane. Fibrous extensions on RAG-1, observed after ruthenium red staining, were absent on the non-hydrophobic mutant MR-481. Tentatively, these extensions could be held responsible for the hydrophobicity ofA. calcoaceticus RAG-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Amory DE, Genet MJ, Rouxhet PG (1988) Application of XPS to surface analysis of yeast cells. Surf Interf Anal 11:478–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bifulco JM, Shirey JJ, Bisonette GK (1989) Detection ofAcinetobacter spp. in rural drinking water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2214–2219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Van der Mei HC, Van Pelt AWJ, De Jong HP, Arends J (1984) Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:980–983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Busscher HJ, Bellon-Fontaine MN, Mozes N, Van der Mei HC, Sjollema J, Léonard AJ, Rouxhet PG, Cerf O (1990) An interlaboratory comparison of physico-chemical methods for studying the surface properties of microorganisms—application toStreptococcus thermophilus andLeuconostoc mesenteroides. J Microbiol Methods 12:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Busscher HJ, Handley PS, Rouxhet PG, Hesketh LM, Van der Mei HC (1991) The relationship between structural and physicochemical surface properties of tuftedStreptococcus sanguis strains. In: Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial cell surface analysis—structural and physicochemical methods. New York: VCH Publishers, Inc., pp 317–338

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dillon JK, Fuerst JA, Hayward AC, Davis HGH (1986) A comparison of five methods for assaying bacterial hydrophobicity. J Microbiol Methods 6:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Handley PS (1991) Negative staining. In: Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial cell surface analysis—structural and physicochemical methods. New York: VCH Publishers, Inc., pp 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  8. Handley PS (1991) Detection of cell surface carbohydrate components. In: Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial cell surface analysis—structural and physicochemical methods. New York: VCH Publishers, Inc. pp 87–107

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mozes N, Rouxhet PG (1987) Methods for measuring hydrophobicity of microorganisms. J Microbiol Methods 6:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenberg M, Doyle RJ (1990) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity: history, measurement and significance. In: Doyle RJ, Rosenberg M (eds) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. ASM Washington DC: pp 1–37

  11. Rosenberg M, Kjelleberg S (1986) Hydrophobic interactions: role in bacterial adhesion. Adv Microb Ecol 9:353–393

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenberg M, Bayer EA, Delarea J, Rosenberg E (1982) Role of thin fimbriae in adherence and growth ofAcinetobacter calcoaceticus on hexadecane. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:929–937

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ten Bosch JJ, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (1991) Statistical analyses of bacterial species based on physicochemical surface properties. Biofouling, in press.

  15. Van der Mei HC, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ (1987) Physico-chemical surface characteristics and adhesive properties ofStreptococcus salivarius strains with defined cell surface structures. FEMS Microbiol Lett 40:15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Mei HC, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ (1987) A comparison of various methods to determine hydrophobic properties of streptococcal cell surfaces. J Microbiol Methods 5:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van der Mei HC, Léonard AJ, Weerkamp AH, Rouxhet PG, Busscher HJ (1988) Surface properties ofStreptococcus salivarius HB and nonfibrillar mutants: measurement of zeta potential and elemental composition with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Bacteriol 170:2462–2466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Mei HC, Léonard AJ, Weerkamp AH, Rouxhet PG, Busscher HJ (1988) Properties of oral streptococci relevant for adherence: zeta potential, surface free energy and elemental composition. Coll Surf 32:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van der Mei HC, Noordmans J, Busscher HJ (1989) Molecular surface characterization of oral streptococci by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 991:395–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Mei HC, Noordmans J, Busscher HJ (1990) The influence of a salivary coating on the molecular surface composition of oral streptococci as determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Infrared Physics 30:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Mei HC, Rosenberg M, Busscher HJ (1991) Assessment of microbial cell surface hydrophobicity. In: Mozes N, Handley PS, Busscher HJ, Rouxhet PG (eds) Microbial cell surface analysis-structural and physicochemical methods. New York: VCH Publishers, Inc., pp 263–287

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zuckerberg A, Diver A, Peri Z, Gutnick, DL, Rosenberg E (1979) Emulsifier ofArthrobacter RAG-1: chemical and physical properties. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:414–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Mei, H.C., Cowan, M.M. & Busscher, H.J. Physicochemical and structural studies onAcinetobacter calcoaceticus RAG-1 and MR-481—Two standard strains in hydrophobicity tests. Current Microbiology 23, 337–341 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104136

Keywords

Navigation