Abstract
Mefluidide [N-2(2,4-dimethyl-5-((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)amino)phenyl)acetamide] was applied to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to determine the alterations in shoot chemical composition and the value of the changes to a wheat-based forage system in field and controlled-environment chamber experiments. Mefluidide, applied at rates between 0.1 and 0.25 kg/ha during full tiller stage (Feekes stage 4), slowed down the rate of cellulose deposition in wheat shoot and reduced neutral-detergent fiber fractions. Mefluidide decreased the rate of nitrogen decline with advancing maturity of treated plants when compared to untreated ones. Mefluidide also reduced cellulose deposition and maintained high nitrogen contents in regrowth shoot tissues in addition to the effect produced by mechanical defoliation. Mefluidide, applied during jointing stage (stage 5), also retarded wheat maturation as the chemical maintained shoot chemical characteristics equivalent to those of earlier stages of development. Mefluidide did not alter significantly shoot chemical composition when applied at boot stage (stage 10), compared to untreated wheat. Based on the experimental results, mefluidide may be a management tool to alter timing of plant development. The delay in maturation and maintenance of vegetative quality longer into the spring attained with mefluidide may suggest a beneficial role of the chemical in a dual-purpose wheat production system that favors forage utilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975) Nitrogen. In: Horwitz W (ed) Official methods of analyses of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Washington, pp 15–17
Cherney JH, Marten CG (1982a) Small grain crop forage potential. 1. Biological and chemical determinants of quality and yield. Crop Sci 22:227–231
Cherney JH, Marten CG (1982b) Small grain crop forage potential. 2. Interrelationships among biological, chemical, morphological, and anatomical determinants of quality. Crop Sci 22:240–245
Dao TH (1984) Effects of mefluidide on the chemical composition of wheat forage, grain and yield components. Weed Sci Soc Am Abstr 111–112
Dao TH (1987) Growth response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to mefluidide. Appl Agric Res 2:146–151
Donnelly KJ, McMurphy WE (1984) Cultural practice for maximizing forage production in wheat. In: Horn G (ed) Proceedings of the National Wheat Pasture Symposium. Oklahoma Agric Exp Stn Misc Pub No. 115, pp 3–22
Dunphy DJ, McDaniel ME, Holt EC (1982) Effect of forage utilization on wheat grain yield. Crop Sci 22:106–109
Everson AC (1966) Effects of frequent clipping at different stubble heights on western wheatgrass (Agropyron smithii Ryb.). Agron J 58:33–35
Glenn S, Rieck CE, Ely DG, Bush LP (1980) Quality of tall fescue forage affected by mefluidide. J Agric Food Chem 28:391–392
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses. USDA Agric Handbook No. 379, p 20
Horn FP, Taliaferro CM (1977) Existing and potential systems of finishing cattle on forages or limited grain rations in the semi-arid southwest. In: Stuedman JA, Huffman DL, Purcell JC, Walker OL (eds) Forage-fed beef: Production and marketing alternatives in the South. South Coop Ser Bull 220:401–418
Krans JV, Beard JB (1985) Effects of clipping on growth and physiology of ‘Merion’ Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci 25:17–20
Large EC (1954) Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes' scale. Plant Physiol 3:128–129
Marten GC, Halgerson TL, Cherney JH (1983) Quality prediction of small grain forages by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Sci 23:94–96
Monson WG, Lowrey RS, Forbes I Jr (1969) In vivo nylon bags vs two-stagein vitro digestion: Comparison of two techniques for estimating the dry matter digestibility of forages. Agron J 61:587–589
Nafziger ED, Wax LM, Brown CM (1986) Response of five winter wheat cultivars to growth regulators and increased nitrogen. Crop Sci 26:767–770
Oltjen JW, Bolsen KK (1980) Wheat, barley, oat and corn silages for growth steers. J Anim Sci 51:958–965
Schaffer CC, Marten GC (1986) Effects of mefluidide on cool-season perennial grass forage yield and quality. Agron J 78:75–79
Shenk JS, Linda I, Hoover MR, Westerhaus MO (1981) Description and evaluation of a near-infrared reflectance spectrocomputer for forage and grain analysis. Crop Sci 21:355–358
Smith D (1960) Yield and chemical composition of oats for forage with advance in maturity. Agron J 52:637–639
Stewart BA, Grunes DL, Mathers AC, Horn FP (1981) Chemical composition of winter wheat forage where grass tetany and bloat occur. Agron J 73:337–347
Undersander DJ (1986) Effect of mefluidide on growth and heading ofTriticum aestivum. J Plant Growth Regul 5:85–90
Yeang HY, Hillman JR (1984) Ethylene and apical dominance. Physiol Plant 60:275–282
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Mention of a trademark, proprietary product or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dao, T.H. Chemical alteration in wheat (Triticum aestivum) shoot induced by mefluidide and defoliation. J Plant Growth Regul 6, 183–191 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02102546
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02102546