Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Extreme rates and heterogeneity in insect DNA evolution

  • Adalgisa Caccone
  • Jeffrey R. Powell


DNA-DNA hybridization studies of insects, more specificallyDrosophila and cave crickets, have revealed interesting patterns of genome evolution that contrast markedly with what has been seen in other taxa, especially mammals and birds. Insect genomes are composed of sections of single-copy DNA with extreme variation in rates of evolutionary change. This variation is more extreme than between introns and exons; introns fall into the relatively conserved fraction of the genome. Attempts to calculate absolute rates of change inDrosophila DNA have all led to estimates some 5–10 times faster than those found in most vertebrates; this is true even for the more conservative part of the nuclear genome. Finally we point out that morphological similarity, chromosomal similarity, and/or ability to form interspecific hybrids is often associated with quite high levels of single-copy DNA divergence in insects as compared to mammals and birds.

Key words

Genome evolution Molecular evolutionary rates Insect DNA Drosophila 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashburner M, Bodmer M, Lemeuneir F (1984) On the evolutionary relationship ofDrosophila melanogaster. Dev Genet 4:295–312.Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste RE (1985) The contribution of retroviruses to the study of mammalian evolution. In: MacIntyre RJ (ed) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum, New York, pp 359–417Google Scholar
  3. Britten RJ (1986) Rates of DNA sequence evolution differ between taxonomic groups. Science 231:1393–1398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown WM (1983) Evolution of mitochondrial DNA. In: Nei M, Koehn RK (eds) Evolution of genes and proteins Sinauer, Sunderland MA, pp 62–88Google Scholar
  5. Caccone A, Powell JR (1987) Molecular evolutionary divergence among North American cave crickets. II. DNA-DNA hybridization. Evolution 41:1215–1238Google Scholar
  6. Caccone A, Amato GD, Powell Jr (1987) Intraspecific DNA divergence inDrosophila: a study on parthenogeneticD. mercatorum. Mol Biol Evol 4:343–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caccone A, Amato GD, Powell JR (1988a) Rates and patterns of scnDNA and mtDNA divergence within theDrosophila melanogaster subgroup. Genetics 118:671–683PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caccone A, DeSalle R, Powell JR (1988b) Calibration of the change in thermal stability of DNA duplexes and degree of base pair mismatch. J Mol Evol 27:212–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crain WR, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1976) Contrasting patterns of DNA sequence arrangement inApis mellifera (honeybee) andMusca domestica (housefly). Chromosoma 59:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Galau GA, Chamberlin BR, Hough BR, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1976) Evolution of repetitive and nonrepetitive DNA. In: Ayala FJ (ed) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp 200–224Google Scholar
  11. Goddard K, Caccone A, Powell JR (1990) Evolutionary implications of DNA divergence in theDrosophila obscura group. Evolution (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Hall TJ, Grula JW, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1980) Evolution of sea urchin non-repetitive DNA. J Mol Evol 16:95–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunt JA, Hall TJ, Britten RJ (1981) Evolutionary distance in HawaiianDrosophila measured by DNA reassociation. J Mol Evol 17:361–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jukes TH, Cantor C (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 21–123Google Scholar
  15. Li W-H, Luo C-C, Wu C-I (1985) Evolution of DNA sequences. In: MacIntyre RJ (ed) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum, New York, pp 1–94Google Scholar
  16. Manning JE, Schmid CW, Davidson N (1975) Interspersion of repetitive and nonrepetitive DNA sequences in theD. melanogaster genome. Cell 4:141–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin CH, Meyerowitz EM (1986) Characterization of the boundaries between adjacent rapidly and slowly evolving regions inDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8654–8658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moriyama E (1987) Higher rates of nucleotide substitution inDrosophila than in mammals. Jpn J Genet 62:139–146Google Scholar
  19. Powell JR, Caccone A (1989) Intra- and interspecific genetic variation inDrosophila. Genome 31:233–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Powell JR, Caccone A (1990) The TEACL method of DNA-DNA hybridization: technical considerations. J Mol Evol 30:000–000Google Scholar
  21. Powell JR, Caccone A, Amato GD, Yoon C (1986) Rates of nucleotide substitution inDrosophila mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA are similar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:9090–9093PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schulze DH, Lee CS (1986) DNA sequence comparison among closely relatedDrosophila species in themulleri complex. Genetics 113:287–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharp PM, Li W-H (1989) On the rate of DNA sequence evolution inDrosophila. J Mol Evol 28:398–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Werman SD, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1990) Rapid evolution in a fraction of theDrosophila nuclear genome. J Mol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Wolstenholme DR, Clary DO (1985) Sequence evolution ofDrosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 109:725–744PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adalgisa Caccone
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Powell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations