Fire Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 245–261 | Cite as

Fire severity and response distance: Initial findings

  • Edward Ignall
  • Kenneth Rider
  • Richard Urbach
Article

Abstract

Rational decisions about the number of fire companies a community should have require reliable estimates of the fire losses that would result. Such estimates are not now available. One building block in their development is a relationship between the distance the responding companies travel and physical damage.

Keywords

Civil Engineer Building Block Reliable Estimate Initial Finding Rational Decision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carter, G., “Simulation Model of Fire Department Operations: Program Description,” Rand R-1188/2, December 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter, G., and Rolph, J., “New York City Fire Alarm Prediction Models — Box-Reported Serious Fires,” R-1214, The New York City Rand Institute, May 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corman, H., Ignall, E., Rider, K., and Stevenson, A., “Fire Casualties and Their Relation to Fire Company Response Distance and Demographic Factors,”Fire Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3 (August 1976), pp. 193–203.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dormont, P., Hausner, J., and Walker, W., “Firehouse Site Evaluation Model: Description and User's Manual,” Rand R-1618/2, June 1975.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fire Station Location Package: Chief Executive's Report, Fire Chief's Report, Project Leader's Guide, Project Operations Guide, Public Technology, Inc., Washington, DC, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Getz, M.,Production in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Urban Fire Service, Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, August 1976.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hogg, J., “A Model of Fire Spread,” Report 2/71, Home Office, Scientific Advisory Branch, London, March 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hogg, J., “Losses in Relation to the Fire Brigade's Attendance Times,” Report 5/73, Home Office, Scientific Advisory Branch, London, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolesar, P., and Blum, E., “Square Root Laws for Fire Engine Response Distances,”Management Sciences, Vol. 19 (August 1973), pp. 1368–1378.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolesar, P., Walker, W., and Hausner, J., “Determining the Relation Between Fire Engine Travel Times and Travel Distances in New York City,Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 4 (May 1975), pp. 614–627.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacGillivray, L., et al., “Evaluating the Organization of Service Delivery: Fire,” Technical Report of Phases I and IIA, Research Triangle Institute, International City Managers Association, National Fire Protection Association (no date).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, R. E., and Rappaport, A., “On the Relationship Between Fire Department Response Times and Damages,” ORSA/TIMS National Meeting, November 1977 (mimeo, Wichita State University).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaenman, P., Hall, J., Schainblatt, A., Swartz, J., and Karter, M.,Measuring Local Fire Protection: Some Potential Improvements, The Urban Institute and National Fire Protection Association, April 1976.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swersey, A., Ignall, E., et al., “Fire Protection and Local Government: An Evaluation of Policy-Related Research,” Rand R-1813, September 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Ignall
  • Kenneth Rider
  • Richard Urbach

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations