Skip to main content
Log in

The power elite and elite-driven countermovements: The associated farmers of california during the 1930s

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

The involvement of the power elite in social movements has been a neglected area of research. The investigation of elites has generally been limited to that of local elites, political parties, and philanthropic foundations, and their involvement in social movements is believed limited to resource support (either to further or deter the progress of an insurgent social movement) or the institutional obstruction or facilitation of the movement. I contend that under specific conditions, the power elite may become active mobilizers, leaders, and supporters of countermovements (movements to deter insurgent movements). These conditions arise during periods of heightened insurgent movement activity and when the efficacy of institutional channels to safeguard or advance the interests of the power elite is reduced. This is illustrated in the case of the Associated Farmers of California, Inc., a countermovement aimed at interfering with and obstructing the attempts of farmworkers to strike and unionize during the 1930s by enlisting citizens and citizen groups as anti-unionization shock troops. It also opposed New Deal policies and legislation. The mobilization of nonelites into the Associated Farmers originated in and was carried out by agricultural and industrial elite of California to advance their own interests. Citizens allied with the Associated Farmers either because of ideological alignment with their goals or dependence on their economic activities. The theoretical ramifications of this example will be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akard, Patrick J. 1992 “Corporate mobilization and political power: The transformation of U.S. economic policy in the 1970s.” American Sociological Review 57:597–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Michael Patrick 1992 “Elite social movement organizations and the state: The rise of the conservative policy-planning network.” In Gwen Moore and J. Allen Whitt (eds.), The Political Consequences of Social Networks: Vol. 4 of Research in Politics and Society: 87–109. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, A. L. 1939 “The Lodi grape pickers' strike of 1933.” Typewritten manuscript. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakersfield Field Notes 1933 Typewritten manuscript Federal Writers' Project Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, Philip 1935 “The farmer and the Communists.” An address before the Commonwealth Club of California, Friday, April 26. San Francisco: Associated Farmers of California, Inc. In Oral History Project (1962) Philip Bancroft: Politics, Farming and the Progressive Party in California. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliven, Bruce 1939 “Hey, Rube! The Associated Farmers and the New Deal.” The New Republic (February): 9.

  • Boies, John L. 1994 “Democracy for the organized: Military and foreign policy in the United States.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meetings, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Boies, John L. andNelson A. Pichardo 1994 “The Committee on the Present Danger: A case for the importance of elite social movement organizations to theories of social movements and the state.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 39:57–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, Steven M. 1990 Women's Movements in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “California Citizens' Association” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Simon J. Lubin Society Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Casson, Gordon 1938 “Wall Street's ‘Farmers’ in action.” Progressive Weekly, October 1. Newspaper cutout. Simon J. Lubin Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Clarke A. 1952 California Farm Organizations. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Loren B. 1981 “California during the early 1930s: The administration of Governor James Rolph, Jr., 1931–1934.” Southern California Quarterly 63:262–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Club of California 1943 Speech of Hank Strobel, Secretary of Associated Farmers before the Section on Agriculture, January 7. Typewritten manuscript, Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. andVirginia Gray 1983 Feminism and the New Right. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Cletus E. 1981 Bitter Harvest. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of State Memorandum 1933 Typewritten letter, HSB to Mr. Johnson. July 22. Record Group 59, File No. 811.5045/139. National Archives.

  • “Development of Associated Farmers of California, Inc.” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Domhoff, William G. 1983 Who Rules America Now? New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 The Power Elite and the State: How Policy is Made in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 “Class conflict or state autonomy in New Deal agricultural policy? Yet another counterattack on a theoretical delusion.” In (ed.), Political Power and Social Theory, Vol. 8: 45–78. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994 Personal communication.

  • “Economic and Political Control of the Imperial Valley” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • “Exhibit D” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • “Exhibit H” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Federal Writers Project 1939 Typewritten manuscript. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Great Cotton Strike” n.d. Federal Writers' Project Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Haines, Herbert H. 1988 Black Radicals and the Civil Rights Mainstream, 1954–1970. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halcomb, Ellen L. 1963 “Efforts to organize the migrant by the cannery and Agricultural Workers' Industrial Union in the 1930s.” M.A. thesis, Chico State College.

  • Halebsky, Sandor 1976 Mass Society and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, Jerome L. 1990 To The Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, Stanley 1971 “The development of political parties in California during the twentieth century.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Hosmer, Helen 1938 “Who are the Associated Farmers?” The Rural Observer 1(9):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1939 “Associated Farmers: Sowers of fascism.” New Masses (October 10): 17–20. Photocopied article, Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig 1983 “Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:527–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985a The Politics of Insurgency. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985b “Foundation funding of progressive social movements.” In J. Shellow (ed.), The Grant Seekers Guide: 7–17. Mt. Kisco, NY: Moyer Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig andC. M. Eckert 1986 “Channeling Black insurgency.” American Sociological Review 51:812–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig andTeri Shumate 1985 “Cowboy capitalists and the rise of the New Right: Analysis of contributors to conservative policy.” Social Problems 33:130–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Orrick 1937 Time of Our Lives. New York: Stackpole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Hearings 1926 United States Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Immigration and Naturalization. Seasonal Agricultural Laborers from Mexico. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1989 “Interorganizational networks.” International Social Movement Research 2:301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labor Disputes Act Hearings 1935 Hearings Before the Committee on Labor on H.R. 6288. House of Representatives, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Wash., DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour and Raab 1979 The Politics of Unreason.

  • Lo, Clarence 1982 “Countermovements and conservative movements in the Contemporary U.S.” Annual Review of Sociology 8:107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, Norman 1940 “Strikes and strike tactics in California agriculture: A history.” M.A. thesis, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane 1986 Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marger, Martin N. 1984 “Social movement organizations and response to environmental change: The NAACP, 1960–1973.” Social Problems 32:16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, John B. 1957 The Deep South Says “Never.” Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Gary T. 1979 “Efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: Some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications.” In Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements: 94–125. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Gary T. andJames L. Wood. 1975 “Strands of theory and research in collective behavior.” Annual Review of Sociology 1:363–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1982 Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency.” American Sociological Review 48:735–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy andMayer N. Zald 1988 “Social movements.” In Handbook of Sociology: 695–737. Neil J. Smelser (ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D. andMayer N. Zald 1973 The Trends of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82:1212–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant 1953 The Decline of Agrarian Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, Neil R. 1971 The Citizen's Council: Organized Resistance to the Second Reconstruction 1954–1964. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, Carey 1939 Factories in the Field. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1942 “California pastoral.” Antioch Review 2:103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, William J. n.d. “The Lodi Grape Pickers' Strike.” Typewritten manuscript. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Mills, C. Wright 1956 The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon 1984 The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottl, Tahi L. 1980 “The analysis of countermovements.” Social Problems 27:620–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • News Release 1940 Associated Farmers of California, Inc. San Francisco, June 14. Typewritten manuscript. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony 1973 Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Officers & Directors of County Affiliates of Associated Farmers of California, Inc.” 1938 Typewritten manuscript, Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oral History Project 1962 Philip Bancroft: Politics, Farming and the Progressive Party in California. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1965 Arthur J. McFadden: Recollections. University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 Wofford B. Camp: Cotton Irrigation, and the AAA. University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peace Officers Association of the State of California 1935 “Organization and Operation of Citizen Groups.” A Peace Officers' Manual for Combatting Subversive Activities: 11–12. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichardo, Nelson A. 1990 The Role of Community in Social Protest: Chicano Working Class Protest, 1848–1933. Ph.D dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan.

  • 1992 “The establishment of Chicano voluntary associations in California, 1910–1930.” Journal of Chicano Studies 19:93–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, Burton Yale 1982 Back to Basics. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances F. andRichard Cloward 1979 Poor Peoples' Movements. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proceedings, California State Sheriffs' Association Convention 1934 The Sheriff, Undersheriff and Deputy. Official Publication of the California State Sheriffs' Association, March 23–24.

  • Proceedings, Peace Officers Association of the State of California 1933 Handwritten excerpt in the Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Propaganda Machine of Associated Farmers” n.d. Exhibit L, Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Radio Address 1937 Radio Address by Colonel Walter E. Garrison, President of Associated Farmers of California. San Jose, Monday, Dec. 6. Radio station KQW. Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogin, M. P. 1967 The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sydney 1983 “Struggling to reform: Social movements and policy change during cycles of protest.” Western Societies Program. Occasional Paper No. 15. Center for International Studies, Cornell University.

  • Taylor, Paul S. andClark Kerr 1933 “Documentary history of the strike of the cotton pickers in California, 1933.” In United States Congress, Senate, Subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor. 1940. Hearings on S. Res. 266, Violations of Free Speech and Rights of Labor, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • The California Citizens' Association — Why? 1938 Typewritten manuscript. Simon J. Lubin Society Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theoharis, Athan G. 1989 “The FBI and Dissent in the United States.” In C. E. S. Franks (ed.), Dissent and the State: 86–110. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Senate, Subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor 1940 Hearings on S. Res. 266, Violations of Free Speech and Rights of Labor, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Bert 1980 “Solidarity model, breakdown model, and the Boston anti-busing movement.” American Sociological Review 45:357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Bert andMayer N. Zald 1982 “From pressure group to social movement: Organizational dilemmas of the effort to promote nuclear power.” Social Problems 30:144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Vigilante Groups, Membership and Activities” n.d. Typewritten manuscript. Federal Writers' Project, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Wubnig, Arthur 1935 “A brief review of outstanding farmers' organizations.” Prepared for the Labor Relations Division. Paul S. Taylor Collection, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, Mayer N. andBert Useem 1987 “Movement and countermovement interaction: Mobilization, tactics, and state involvement.” In Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (eds.), Social Movements in an Organizational Society: 319–336. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pichardo, N.A. The power elite and elite-driven countermovements: The associated farmers of california during the 1930s. Sociol Forum 10, 21–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098563

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098563

Key words

Navigation