Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and Chlamydiazyme for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt was made to improve laboratory diagnosis ofChalmydia trachomatis and to validate the Abbott Chlamydiazyme confirmatory test used at present by comparing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the Abbott enzyme immunoassay. A total of 275 routine clinical specimens representing a range of positive and negative findings by Chlamydiazyme were retested by PCR. The procedures demonstrated 99 % concordance for specimens with optical density (OD) readings above the Chlamydiazyme cut-off of 0.1, but PCR was confirmed to be significantly more sensitive (p<0.025) for specimens with OD values between 0.05 and 0.09. Specimens in this range should be retested routinely by PCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stamm W, Tam M, Koester M, Cles L: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 17: 666–668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Binns B, Williams T, McDowell J, Brunham RC: Screening forChlamydia trachomatis infection in a pregnancy counseling clinic. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988, 159: 1144–1149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moncada J, Schacter J, Bolan G, Engelman J, Howard L, Mushahwar I, Ridgway G, Mumtaz G, Stamm W, Clark A: Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the Chlamydiazyme test forChlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1770–1773.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mardh P, Paavonen J, Puolakkainen M: Diagnosis of chlamydial infections. In: Mardh P, Paavonen J, Puolakkainen M (ed.): Chlamydia. Plenum Publishing, New York, 1988, p. 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ostergaard L, Birkelund S, Christiansen G: Use of polymerase chain reaction for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1254–1260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dutilh B, Bebar C, Rodriquez P, Vihris A, Bonnet J, Garret M: Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to allChlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Research in Microbiology 1989, 140: 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bobo L, Coutter F, Yolken R, Quinn T, Viscidi R: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1968–1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland S, Gaydos C, Quinn T: Detection and differentiation ofChlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci andChlamydia pneumoniae by DNA amplification. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990, 162: 984–987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollard DR, Tyler SD, Ng GW, Rozee KR: A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol for the specific detection ofChlamydia spp. Molecular and Cellular Probes 1989, 3: 383–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Claas H, Hagenvoort J, Niesters H, Tio J, Van Rejsoort-Vos, Quint W: Diagnostic value of polymerase chain reaction forChlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 42–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uyeda CT, Welborn P, Ellison-Birang N, Skunk K, Tsaouse B: Rapid diagnosis of chlamydial infections with the Microtrak Direct Test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 948–950.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McNicol PJ, Dodd JG: Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in prostate gland tissue using the polymerase chain reaction amplification assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 409–412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwok S, Higuchi R: Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 1989, 339: 237–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Franchis R, Cross N, Foulkes N, Cox T: A Potent inhibitor of Taq polymerase copurifies with human genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 1988, 16: 10355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erlich H, Bugawan T: HLA DNA typing. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, White T (ed): PCR protocols. A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, 1990, p. 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, T.W., Tyler, S.D., Giercke, S. et al. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and Chlamydiazyme for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11, 233–236 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098085

Keywords

Navigation