Skip to main content
Log in

The use of multiple-vessel, open flow systems to investigate carbon flow in anaerobic microbial communities

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Five vessels, connected in series, were used for a continuous flow system to model carbon flow in anaerobic microbial communities. Two such 5-vessel systems were constructed, the inflows containing 10 mM sulfate and either 10 mM glucose or benzoate. Dilution was slow (D=0.0018 h−1 for the whole system).

Analyses of dissolved organic and inorganic carbon, and of CO2 and CH4, showed that the systems attained steady states in which biomass was constant, although there was net biosynthesis in the early vessels and net mineralization in succeeding vessels.

Examination of the distributions of sulfate reduction, methanogenesis, and of H2+CO2-utilizing fatty acid-forming bacteria revealed spatial separation of these functional groups of bacteria in different vessels of the array, resembling the vertical spatial separation found in many natural sediments. Such model systems should, therefore, prove valuable in investigating the many microbial activities that contribute to the flow of carbon in anaerobic microbial communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978) Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol 117:89–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978) Hydrogen as a substrate for methanogenesis and sulphate reduction in anaerobic saltmarsh sediment. Arch Microbiol 117:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abson JW, Todhunter KH (1961) Plant for continuous biological treatment of carbonisation. Society of Chemical Industry Monograph 12:147–164

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Public Health Association (1976) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 14th ed. New York

  5. Balba MT, Nedwell DB (1982) Microbial metabolism of acetate, propionate and butyrate in anoxic sediments from Colne Point Salt Marsh. J Gen Microbiol 128:1415–1422

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balch WE, Schoberth S, Tanner RS, Wolfe RS (1979)Acetobacterium: a new genus of H2 oxidizing CO2 reducing bacteria. Int J of System Bacteriol 27:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  7. Banat IM, Lindström EB, Nedwell DB, Balba MT (1981) Evidence for the coexistence of two distinct functional groups of sulphate-reducing bacteria in salt marsh sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:985–992

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braun M, Schoberth S, Gottschalk G (1979) Enumeration of bacteria forming acetate from H2 and CO2 in anaerobic habitats. Arch Microbiol 120:201–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cappenberg TE (1974) Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a freshwater lake. I. Field observations. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 40:285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper DG, Copeland BJ (1973) Response of a continuous series of estuarine ecosystems to point source input variations. Ecological Monographs 43:213–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferry JG, Wolfe RS (1976) Anaerobic degradation of benzoate to methane by a microbial consortium. Arch Mikrobiol 107:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kristjansson JK, Schönheit P, Thauer RK (1982) Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria. An explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovitt RW, Wimpenny JWT (1981) The gradostat: a bidirectional compound chemostat and its application in microbiological research. J Gen Microbiol 127:261–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nedwell DB (1982) The cycling of sulphur in marine and freshwater sediments. In: Nedwell DB, Brown CM (eds) Sediment microbiology. Academic Press, London, pp 73–106

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nedwell DB, Abram JW (1978) Bacterial sulphate reduction in relation to sulphur geochemistry in two contrasting areas of salt marsh sediment. Estuarine Coastal Mar Sci 6:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nedwell DB, Banat IM (1981) Hydrogen as an electron donor for sulfate reducing bacteria in slurries of salt marsh sediments. Microb Ecol 7:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reeburgh WS, Heggie DT (1977) Microbial methane consumption reactions and their effect on methane distributions in freshwater and marine environments. Limnol Oceanogr 22:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schönheit P, Kristjansson JK, Thauer RK (1982) Kinetic mechanism for the ability of sulfatereducers to outcompete methanogens for acetate. Arch Mikrobiol 132:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veldkamp H (1976) Continuous culture in microbial physiology and ecology. Meadow Field Press, England

    Google Scholar 

  20. Winfrey MR, Zeikus JG (1977) Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in fresh water sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS (1963) Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biolog Chem 238:2882–2886

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, L.A., Nedwell, D.B., Balba, M.T. et al. The use of multiple-vessel, open flow systems to investigate carbon flow in anaerobic microbial communities. Microb Ecol 9, 189–199 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097736

Keywords

Navigation