, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 95–105 | Cite as

Biomass and productivity of the subalpine Pinus albicaulis — Vaccinium scoparium association in Montana, USA

  • F. Forcella
  • T. Weaver


Biomass Pinus albicaulis Productivity (net primary) Root mass Subalpine forest Vaccinium scoparium Woodland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreyashkina, N. I. & P. O. Gorchakovskii. 1972. The productivity and methods of its assessment, of shrub, dwart-shrub and herbaceous communities of the forest tundra. Ekologiya 3: 5–12.Google Scholar
  2. Baskerville, G. L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 49–53.Google Scholar
  3. Boyce, J. S. 1961. Forest Pathology. McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 572 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp, J. J. & J. S. Olson. 1973. Corrections for bias in regression estimates after logarithmic transformation. Ecology 54: 1403–1407.Google Scholar
  5. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Springer-Verlag, Wien/New York. 865 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, J. R. 1963. Root production and the estimation of net productivity, Can. J. Bot. 41: 65–72.Google Scholar
  7. Daubenmire, R. & J. B. Daubenmire. 1968. Forest vegetation of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 60. 104 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Day, R. J. 1966. Whitebark pine in the Rocky Mountains of Alberta. For. Chron. 43: 278–284.Google Scholar
  9. Elkington, T. T. & B. M. G. Jones. 1974. Biomass and primary productivity of birch (Betula pubescens s. lat.) in South-West Greenland. J. Ecol. 62: 821–830.Google Scholar
  10. Faull, J. H. 1939. A review of the extension of our knowledge of Calyptospora goeppertianum Kuehne. J. Arnold Arboretum 20: 104–113.Google Scholar
  11. Forcella, F. 1975. A nonparametric method for the detection of pattern in vegetation. Mont. Acad. Sci. Proc. 35: 38–34.Google Scholar
  12. Forcella, F. & T. Weaver. 1977. Cone crops in whitebark pine forests (in review).Google Scholar
  13. Grier, C. C. & R. S. Logan. 1975. Biomass, productivity and nutrient distribution and cycling in a conifer forest on the Oregon Coast. Northwest Sci., Program and Abstracts, 47th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  14. Grime, J. P. 1966. Shade avoidance and tolerance in flowering plants. In: R. Bainbridge, G. C. Evans & O. Rackham (eds.), Light as an Ecological Factor, pp. 281–301. Blackwell Scientif. Publ., Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Handley, D. P. 1976. Tree biomass and productivity estimated for three habitat types of Northern Idaho. U. Idaho For., Wildl. and Range Exp. Stn. Bull. 14, Moscow, Idaho. 15 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Hickman, J. C. 1976. Non-forest vegetation of the Central Western Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Northwest Sci. 50: 145–155.Google Scholar
  17. Grime, J. P. & R. Hunt. 1975. Relative growth rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. J. Ecol. 63: 393–422.Google Scholar
  18. Hitchcock, C. L. & A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle. 730 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, F. L. & P. G. Risser. 1974. Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-blackjack oak forest. Ecology 55: 1246–1258.Google Scholar
  20. Johnston, W. D. 1971. Total standing crop and three component distribution in three stands of 100 year-old lodgepole pine. In: Young, H. E. (ed.), Forest Biomass Studies. U. Maine Agric. Exp. Sta., Orono.Google Scholar
  21. Kimura, M. 1963. Dynamics of vegetation in relation to soil development in Northern Yatsugatake Mountains. Jap. J. Bot. 18: 255–287.Google Scholar
  22. Kaspar, J. B. & T. Szabo. 1970. The physical and mechanical properties of whitebark pine. Forest Chrom. 46: 314–316.Google Scholar
  23. Kira, T. & T. Shidei. 1967. Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the Western Pacific. Jap. J. Ecol. 17: 70–87.Google Scholar
  24. Keenan, F. J. et al. 1970. Mechanical properties of Pinus albicaulis. Forest Chron. 46: 322–325.Google Scholar
  25. Knight, D. H. 1975. The potential sensitivity of various ecosystem components to winter precipitation management in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming. Dept. Bot., U. Wyoming, Laramie. 376 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Landis, T. D. & E. W. Mogren. 1975. Tree strata biomass of subalpine sprucefir stands in Southwestern Colorado. Forest Sci. 21: 9–12.Google Scholar
  27. Loucks, O. L. 1970. Evolution of diversity, efficiency and community stability. Amer. Zool. 10: 17–25.Google Scholar
  28. Madgwick, H. A. I. & T. Satoo. 1975. On estimating the above-ground weights of tree stands. Ecology 56: 1446–1450.Google Scholar
  29. Mälkönen, E. 1975. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in some Scots Pine stands. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 84: 1–87.Google Scholar
  30. Mealey, S. 1975. The natural food habits of free ranging grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park, 1973–1974. Thesis Montana State Univ., Bozeman.Google Scholar
  31. Moir, W. H. 1972. Litter, foliage, branch and stem production in contrasting lodgepole pine habitats of the Colorado Front Range. In: Franklin, J. F., L. J. Dempster & R. Waring (eds.), Proceedings Research on Coniferous Forest Ecosystems — a Symposium, pp. 189–198. Pac. Northwest Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  32. Peattle, D. C. 1953. A natural history of western trees. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 751 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Pfister, R. D. 1976. Land capability assessment by habitat types. In: America's Renewable Resource Potential — 1975: The turning point. Proc. 1975 Natl. Conv. Soc. Am. For., pp. 312–325.Google Scholar
  34. Pfister, R. D., B. L. Kovalchik, S. F. Arno & R. C. Presby. 1974. Forest habitat types of Montana. USDA Forest Service. Intermtn. Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Missoula, Montana. 213 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Rodin, L. E. & N. I. Bazilevich. 1967. Production and mineral cycling in terrestrial vegetation. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh/London. 288 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Shinozaki, K., K. Yoda, K. Hozumi & T. Kira. 1964. A quantitative analysis of plant form — the pipe model theory. Jap. J. Ecol. 14: 97–105.Google Scholar
  37. Spurr, S. H. 1952. Forest Inventory. The Ronald Press, New York. 476 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Weaver, T. 1974. The growth of two scrub oaks and the cost of their leaves. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci. 35: 19–23.Google Scholar
  39. Weaver, T. & D. Dale. 1974. Pinus albicaulis in Central Montana: environment, vegetation and production. Am. Mid. Nat. 92: 222–230.Google Scholar
  40. Weaver, T. & F. Forcella. 1977. Biomass estimates of Northern Rocky Mountain trees and forests. Great Basin Nat. (in press).Google Scholar
  41. Weckwerth, R. 1971. Grizzly bear. In: T. Musselh & F. Howell (eds.), Game Management in Montana. Montana Fish and Game, Helena. 238 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Westlake, D. F. 1963. Comparisons of plant productivity. Biol. Rev., Cambridge Phil. Soc. 38: 385–425.Google Scholar
  43. Westman, W. E. & R. H. Whittaker. 1975. The pygmy forest region of northern California: studies on biomass and primary productivity. J. Ecol. 63: 493–520.Google Scholar
  44. Whittaker, R. H. 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 47: 103–121.Google Scholar
  45. Whittaker, R. H., F. H. Bormann, G. E. Likens & T. G. Siccama. 1974. The Hubbard-Brook ecosystem study: forest biomass and production. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 233–252.Google Scholar
  46. Whittaker, R. H. & P. L. Marks. 1975. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: H. Lieth & R. H. Whittaker (eds.), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, pp. 55–118. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Whittaker, R. H. & W. A. Niering. 1975. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, production and diversity along the elevation gradient. Ecology 56: 771–791.Google Scholar
  48. Whittaker, R. H. & G. M. Woodwell. 1968. Dimension and production relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven Forest, New York. J. Ecol. 56: 1–25.Google Scholar
  49. Yoda, K. 1968. A preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal. III. Plant biomass in the sample plots chosen from different vegetation zones. J. College Arts Sci., Chiba Univ. Nat. Sci. Ser. 5: 277–302.Google Scholar
  50. Zavitkowski, J. & R. D. Stevens. 1972. Primary productivity of red alder ecosystems. Ecology 53: 235–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. - Publishers 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Forcella
    • 1
  • T. Weaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations