Skip to main content
Log in

Physiologic appraisal of a new rescue respirator with positive pressure

  • Published:
Pneumonologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four healthy firemen worked on the bicycle ergometer during four steps: (1) without a mask; (2) with a mean mask pressure equal to atmospheric pressure; (3) with a slight positive mean pressure of + 3.1 cm H2O inside the mask; (4) with a higher positive mean pressure of + 6.3 cm H2O inside the mask and a minimal mask pressure of + 2.2 cm H2O. Intraesophageal mean pressure increased only half as much as mask pressure. Only a slight tachycardia and a slight arterial hypotension was seen in step 4 compared to the control steps. Accordingly, a moderate increase of the preejection period (PEP) and a decrease of the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) was recorded, leading to a rise of the PEP/LVET ratio (left ventricular dysfunction). In contrast, no trace of arterial hypoxemia was seen. Opening of closed airways may explain this unexpected result.

The new positive pressure respirator used in this study seems to be suitable for rescue work in smoke and toxic gases. The following preconditions have to be remembered: (1) The mean pressure in the mask should never exceed + 6.5 cm H2O; (2) a fireman's physical performance seems to be reduced to 2000–2500 ml/min O2 uptake; (3) the upright body position may increase positive pressure-induced tachycardia and arterial hypotension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chassot, J., Meyer, E., and Scherrer, M.: L'oxygénothérapie ambula toire. Schweiz. Med. Wschr.103, 1234 (1973)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hooper, R. G., Whitcomb, M. E.: Systolic time intervals in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation50, 1205 (1974)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, A., Falke, K. J., Geffin, B., Aldredge, C. F., Laver, M. B., Loewenstein, E., Pontoppidan, H.: Continuous positive-pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. New Engl. J. Med.283, 1430 (1970)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer, E., Scherrer, M.: Vergleichende atemphysiologische Untersuchung dreier Atemschutzgeräte. Schweiz. Med. Wschr.104, 346 (1974)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pride, N. B., Permutt, S., Riley, R. L., Bromberger-Barnea, B.: Determinants of maximal expiratory flow from the lungs. J. Appl. Physiol.23, 646 (1967)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scherrer, M.: Heimbehandlung der chronischen Ateminsuffizienz. Schweiz. Med. Wschr.105, VIII (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scherrer, M., Birchler, A.: Altersabhängigkeit des alveolo-arteriellen O2-Partialdruckgradienten bei Schwerarbeit in Normoxie, Hyperoxie und Hypoxie. Med. Thorac.24, 99 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weissler, A. M.: Noninvasive Cardiology. New York: Grune and Stratton (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weissler, A. M., Harris, W. S., Schoenfeld, C. D.: Systolic time intervals in heart failure in man. Circulation37, 149 (1968)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by grants from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, E., Gurtner, H.P. & Scherrer, M. Physiologic appraisal of a new rescue respirator with positive pressure. Pneumonologie 153, 61–72 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096335

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096335

Key words

Navigation