Skip to main content
Log in

Degeneracy in NLP and the development of results motivated by its presence

  • Part I: Surveys
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study notions of nondegeneracy and several levels of increasing degeneracy from the perspective of the local behavior of a local solution of a nonlinear program when problem parameters are slightly perturbed. Ideal nondegeneracy at a local minimizer is taken to mean satisfaction of second order sufficient conditions, linear independence and strict complimentary slackness. Following a brief exploration of the relationship of these conditions with the classical definition of nondegeneracy in linear programming, we recall a number of optimality and regularity conditions used to attempt to resolve degeneracy and survey results of Fiacco, McCormick, Robinson, Kojima, Gauvin and Janin, Shapiro, Kyparisis and Liu. This overview may be viewed as a structured survey of sensitivity and stability results: the focus is on progressive levels of degeneracy. We note connections of nondegeneracy with the convergence of algorithms and observe the striking parallel between the effects of nondegeneracy and degeneracy on optimality conditions, stability analysis and algorithmic convergence behavior. Although our orientation here is primarily interpretive and noncritical, we conclude that more effort is needed to unify optimality, stability and convergence theory and more results are needed in all three areas for radically degenerate problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Alt, Lipschitzian perturbation of infinite optimization problems, in:Mathematical Programming with Data Perturbation II, ed. A.V. Fiacco (New York, 1983).

  2. A. Auslender and R. Cominetti, First and second-order sensitivity analysis of nonlinear programs under directional constraint qualification conditions, Optimization 21 (1990) 351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.V. Fiacco and G.P. McCormick,Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.V. Fiacco,Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming (Academic Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.V. Fiacco, Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty methods, Math. Progr. 10 (1976) 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A.V. Fiacco and Y. Ishizuka, Sensitivity and stability analysis for nonlinear programming, Ann. Oper. Res. 27 (1990) 215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Gauvin and R. Janin, Directional behavior of optimal solutions in nonlinear mathematical programming, Math. Oper. Res. 13 (1988) 629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N.H. Josephy, Newton's method for generalized equations, Technical Summary Report No. 1965, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1979).

  9. N.H. Josephy, Quasi-Newton methods for generalized equations, Technical Summary Report No. 1966, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1979).

  10. M. Kojima, Strongly stable stationary solutions in nonlinear programs, in:Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points, ed. S.M. Robinson (Academic press, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kyparisis, On uniqueness of Kuhn-Tucker multipliers in nonlinear programming, Math. Progr. 32 (1985) 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kyparisis, Sensitivity analysis framework for variational inequalities, Math. Progr. 38 (1987) 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kyparisis, Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programs and variational inequalities with nonunique multipliers, Math. Oper. Res. 15 (1990) 286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Liu, Linear stability of generalized equations, Part I: basic theory, Technical paper T-548, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Liu, Linear stability of generalized equations, Part II: applications to nonlinear programming, Technical paper T-549, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Liu, Regular generalized equations, Technical paper T-551, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Liu, Directional differentiability of solutions in nonlinear programs and variational inequalities with nonunique multipliers, Technical paper T-552, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Liu, Solution Holder continuity for nonlinear programs, A Technical Note, Department of Operations Research, George Washington University, Washington, DC (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.P. McCormick, Optimality criteria in nonlinear programming, in:SIAM-AMS Proc. 9 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1975) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.J.D. Powell, Variable metric methods for constrained optimization, in:Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art, eds. A. Bachem, M. Grötschel and B. Korte (Springer, Berlin, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.M. Robinson, Perturbed Kuhn-Tucker points and rates of convergence for a class of nonlinear programming algorithms, Math. Progr. 7 (1974) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Robinson, Strongly regular generalized equations, Math. Oper. Res. 5 (1980) 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S.M. Robinson, Generalized equations and their solutions, Part II: applications to nonlinear programming, Math. Progr. Study 19 (1982) 200.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.T. Rockafellar, Directional differentiability of the optimal value function in a nonlinear programming problem, Math. Progr. Study 21 (1984) 213.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Sachs, Rates of convergence for adaptive Newton methods. J. Optim. Appl. 48 (1986) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Shapiro, Second order sensitivity analysis and asymptotic theory of parameterized nonlinear programs, Math. Progr. 33 (1985) 280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Shapiro, Sensitivity analysis of nonlinear programs and differentiability properties of metric projection, SIAM J. Control Optim. 26 (1988) 628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Wang and F. Zhao, On the directional derivatives of optimal value functions in mathematical programming and its applications, Preprint, Institute of Operations Research, Qufu Normal University, Shandong, P.R. China (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. G.P. McCormick,Nonlinear Programming: Theory, Algorithms, and Application (Wiley, 1983).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by National Science Foundation Grant ECS 90-00560 and Grant N00014-89-J-1537 Office of Naval Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiacco, A.V., Liu, J. Degeneracy in NLP and the development of results motivated by its presence. Ann Oper Res 46, 61–80 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096257

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096257

Keywords

Navigation