Skip to main content
Log in

Two approaches to county population projections

  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It should be emphasized that the two approaches were used in a completely independent fashion. The authors are highly gratified at the similarity of the aggregate statewide projections and those for the Denver area. It must be conceded that wide differences in county level projections may be hidden and mutually offsetting in the statewide and SMSA figures. In most cases these divergences can be satisfactorily explained in terms of the alternative assumptions employed in each method, and the policy maker may choose the result which flows from the method employing the most defensible assumptions. Population projections are becoming an increasingly common concern of public officials and we would recommend the use of independent alternative procedures to provide a necessary reciprocal check on the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Udis is a Professor of Economics and Director of the Bureau of Economic Research at the University of Colorado and Dr. Leasure is an Associate Professor of Economics at San Diego State College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Udis, B., Leasure, J.W. Two approaches to county population projections. Ann Reg Sci 2, 72–87 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02096178

Keywords

Navigation