Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 391–396 | Cite as

Heat shock protein induction and the acquisition of thermotolerance in the psychrotrophic yeastTrichosporon pullulans

  • Craig R. Julseth
  • William E. Inniss
Article

Abstract

Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of the heat shock response in the psychrotrophic yeastTrichosporon pullulans revealed the induction of 11 heat shock proteins (hsps) after a 5° to 21°C heat shock, 12 hsps after a 5° to 26°C heat shock, and 12 hsps after a 5° to 29°C heat shock. Heat shock from 5° to 26° or 29°C resulted in a statistically significant increase in thermotolerance to a lethal heat challenge at 45°C for 5 min. When the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, was added prior to the heat shock, no statistically significant thermotolerance was acquired. To confirm the correlation between the synthesis of hsps and the acquisition of thermotolerance, protein extracts of cells that had been heat shocked in the presence or absence of cycloheximide were electrophoretically analyzed. Addition of the same concentration of cycloheximide that prevented the acquisition of thermotolerance also inhibited the synthesis of any hsps.

Keywords

Protein Synthesis Heat Shock Heat Shock Protein Protein Extract Cycloheximide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Allan B, Linseman M, MacDonald LA, Lam JS, Kropinski AM (1988) Heat shock response ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 170:3668–3674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg GR, Inniss WE, Heikkila JJ (1987) Stress proteins and thermotolerance in psychrotrophic yeasts from arctic environments. Can J Microbiol 33:383–389Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniels CJ, McKee AHZ, Doolittle WF (1984) Archaebacterial heat shock proteins. EMBO J 3:745–749Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall BG (1983) Yeast thermotolerance does not require protein synthesis. J Bacteriol 156:1363–1365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hallberg RL (1986) No heat shock protein synthesis is required for induced thermostabilization of translational machinery. Mol Cell Biol 6:2267–2270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laszlo A (1988) Evidence for two states of thermotolerance in mammalian cells. Int J Hyperthermia 4:513–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee YJ, Dewey WC (1987) Induction of heat shock proteins in Chinese hamster ovary cells and development of thermotolerance by intermediate concentrations of puromycin. J Cell Physiol 132:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee YJ, Dewey WC (1987) Effect of cycloheximide or puromycin on induction of thermotolerance by sodium arsenite in Chinese hamster ovary cells: involvement of heat shock proteins. J Cell Physiol 132:41–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee YJ, Dewey WC (1987) Effect of cycloheximide or puromycin on induction of thermotolerance by heat in Chinese hamster ovary cells: dose fractionation at 45.5°C. Cancer Res 47:5960–5966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li GC, Werb Z (1982) Correlation between synthesis of heat shock proteins and development of thermotolerance in chinese hamster fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 79:3218–3222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McAlister L, Finkelstein DB (1980) Heat shock proteins and thermal resistance in yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 93:819–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCallum KL, Heikkila JJ, Inniss WE (1986) Temperature-dependent pattern of heat shock protein synthesis in psychrophilic and psychrotrophic microorganisms. Can J Microbiol 32:516–521Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neidhardt FC, VanBogelen RA (1987) Heat shock response. In: Neidhardt FC, Ingraham JL, Low KB, Magasanik B, Schaechter M, Umbarger EH (eds),Escherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, pp 1334–1345Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Farrell PH (1975) High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 250:4007–4021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plesofsky-Vig N, Brambl R (1985) Heat shock response ofNeurospora crassa: protein synthesis and induced thermotolerance. J Bacteriol 162:1083–1091PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plesset J, Ludwig JR, Cox BS, McLaughlin CS (1987) Effect of cell cycle position on thermotolerance inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 169:779–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riabowol KT, Mizzen LA, Welch WJ (1988) Heat shock is lethal to fibroblasts microinjected with antibodies against hsp70. Science 242:433–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Welch WJ, Mizzen LA (1988) Characterization of the thermotolerant cell. II. Effects on the intracellular distribution of heat-shock protein 70, intermediate filaments, and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complexes. J Cell Biol 106:1117–1130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamamori T, Yura T (1982) Genetic control of heat shock protein synthesis and its bearing on growth and thermal resistance inEscherichia coli K-12. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:860–864PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig R. Julseth
    • 1
  • William E. Inniss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations