Sociological Forum

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 419–454 | Cite as

Political theater and student organizations in the 1989 Chinese movement: A multivariate analysis of Tiananmen

  • Douglas J. Guthrie


Social movement research has often been divided between organizational and cultural analyses of collective action. Organizationally oriented theorists have viewed indigenous organizational structure as the critical variable in the emergence of collective action. Political culture and cultural frame theorists have focused instead on the cultural frames that resonate with audiences, mobilizing them to action. But social movements cannot be the result of one or the other of these factors. An analysis of the 1989 Chinese movement illuminates the multivariate aspects of this social movement. This movement was a two-tiered movement with an organized student leadership tier and a mass audience. Enmeshed in university organizations and student networks, the student leaders relied on an organizational structure that had been emerging since the mid-1980s. This organized leadership tier employed cultural symbols and acts to mobilize mass audiences that were beyond the scope of the students' organizational linkages. The “political theater” of the organized student leaders was complemented by institutional changes that had been occurring over the decade of reform in China and a political opportunity that allowed wide coverage of the students' activities.

Key words

social movements China Tiananmen culture in action 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Calhoun, Craig 1989 “Protest in Beijing: The conditions and importance of the Chinese student movement of 1989.”Partisan Review 4:563–580.Google Scholar
  2. 1991 “The problem of identity in collective action.” In Joan Huber (ed.),Macro-Micro Linkages in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Cheek, Timothy 1992 “From Priests to professionals: Intellectuals and the state under the CCP.” In Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom and Elizabeth J. Perry (eds.),Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning From 1989: 124–145. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dittmer, Lowell 1989 “The Tiananmen massacre.”Problems of Communism 38:2–15.Google Scholar
  5. Esherick, Joseph W. andJeffrey N. Wasserstrom 1992 “Acting out democracy: Political theater in modern China.” In Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom and Elizabeth J. Perry (eds.),Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning From 1989: 28–66. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fernandez, Roberto M. andDoug McAdam 1988 “Social networks and social movements: Multiorganizational fields and recruitment in freedom Summer.”Sociological Forum 3:441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fligstein, Neil 1990The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fligstein, Neil andPeter Brantley 1992 “Bank control, owner control, or organizational dynamics: Who controls the large modern corporation?”American Journal of Sociology 98:280–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey, Scott R., Thomas Dietz, andLinda Kalof 1992 “Characteristics of successful American protest groups: Another look at Gamson'sStrategy of Social Protest.”American Journal of Sociology 98:368–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gamson, William A. 1975The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  11. Geertz, Clifford 1973The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gold, Thomas 1990 “Urban private business and social change.” In Deborah Davis and Ezra F. Vogel (eds.),Chinese Society on the Eve of Tiananmen: The Impact of Reform: 157–178. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goldstone, Jack A. 1980a “The weakness of organization: A new look at Gamson'sThe Strategy of Social Protest.”American Journal of Sociology 85:1017–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 1980b “Mobilization and organization: A reply to Foley and Steedly and to Gamson.”American Journal of Sociology 85:1428–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould, Roger V. 1991 “Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871.”American Sociological Review 56:716–729.Google Scholar
  16. Gurr, Ted 1970Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hirsch, Eric L. 1990 “Sacrifice for the cause: Group processes, recruitment, and commitment in a student social movement.”American Sociological Review 55:243–252.Google Scholar
  18. Hunt, Lynn 1984Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kornhauser, William 1959The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Link, Perry 1989 “The Chinese intellectuals and the revolt.”New York Review of Books, (June 29):38–41.Google Scholar
  21. Lipset, Seymour M. andEarl Rabb 1973The Politics of Unreason: Right-Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Liu, Binyan 1989“Tell the World”: What Happened in China and Why. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  23. MacKinnon, Stephen R. 1992 “The role of the Chinese and U.S. media.” In Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom and Elizabeth J. Perry (eds.),Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning From 1989: 206–214. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  24. Macy, Michael W. 1991 “Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action.”American Sociological Review 56:730–747.Google Scholar
  25. McAdam, Doug 1982Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. 1986 “Recruitment of high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer.”American Journal of Sociology 92:64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 1988Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 1989 “The biographical consequences of activism.”American Sociological Review 54:744–760.Google Scholar
  29. 1992 “Gender as a mediator of the activist experience: The case of Freedom Summer.”American Journal of Sociology 97:1211–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McAdam, Doug andRonelle Paulsen 1993 “Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism.”American Journal of Sociology 99:640–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy, John andMayer Zald 1977 “Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.”American Sociological Review 82:1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melucci, Alberto 1989 “Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs In Contemporary Society.” Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nathan, Andrew J. 1989 “Chinese democracy in 1989: Continuity and change.”Problems of Communism 38 (September–October):16–29.Google Scholar
  34. Opp, Karl-Dieter andChristine Gern 1993 “Dissident groups, personal networks, and spontaneous cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989.”American Sociological Review 58:659–680.Google Scholar
  35. Perry, Elizabeth J. 1992 “Casting a Chinese ‘Democracy’ movement: The roles of students, workers, and entrepreneurs.” In Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom and Elizabeth J. Perry (eds.),Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning From 1989: 146–164. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Piven, Frances Fox andRichard A. Cloward 1979Poor People's Movements. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  37. Schurmann, Franz 1966Ideology and Organization in Communist China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, James C. 1990Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Selznick, Phillip 1970 “Institutional Vulnerability in Mass Society.” In Joseph R. Gusfield, ed.,Protest, Reform, and Revolt 258–274. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Shen, Tong 1990Almost a Revolution. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Skocpol, Theda 1979States and Social Revolutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Smelser, Neil 1962Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, andRobert D. Benford 1986 “Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.”American Sociological Review 51:464–481.Google Scholar
  44. Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher, Jr., andSheldon Ekland-Olson 1980 “Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment.”American Sociological Review 45:787–801.Google Scholar
  45. Strand, David 1990 “Protest in Beijing: Civil society and public sphere in China.”Problems of Communism (May–June):1–19.Google Scholar
  46. Swidler, Ann 1986 “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.”American Sociological Review 51:273–286.Google Scholar
  47. 1995 “Cultural power and Social movements.” In Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans (eds.),Social Movements and Culture 25–40, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tilly, Charles 1978From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  49. Walder, Andrew G. 1986Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. 1989 “The political sociology of the Beijing upheaval of 1989.”Problems of Communism 38 (September–October):30–40.Google Scholar
  51. 1991 “Workers, managers, and the state: The reform era and the political crisis of 1989.”The China Quarterly 127:477–492.Google Scholar
  52. Walder, Andrew G. andGong Xiaoxia 1993 “Workers in the Tiananmen protests: The politics of the Beijing Workers' Autonomous Federation.”The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 29:1–29.Google Scholar
  53. Walsh Edward J. 1981 “Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around Three Mile Island.”Social Problems 29:1–21.Google Scholar
  54. Wank, David L. 1995 “Private business, bureaucracy, and political alliance in a Chinese city.”The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 33:55–71.Google Scholar
  55. Wasserstrom, Jeffrey N. andElizabeth Perry 1992Popular Protest and Political Culture in Modern China: Learning From 1989. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  56. Whyte, Martin K. andWilliam L. Parish 1984Urban Life in Contemporary China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, Jeanne L. 1990 “Labor policy in China: Reform and retrogression.”Problems of Communism (September–October): 44–65.Google Scholar
  58. Zhou, Xueguang 1993 “Unorganized Interests and collective action in Communist China.”American Sociological Review 58:54–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas J. Guthrie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations