Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 361–392 | Cite as

Beyond the nature/society divide: Learning to think about a mountain

  • William R. Freudenburg
  • Scott Frickel
  • Robert Gramling
Articles

Abstract

Sociological efforts to understand environment-society relationships fall primarily into four conceptual categories. The first three, involving analytical separation, analytical primacy, and balanced dualism, all draw distinctions between biophysical and social aspects of human experience, with subsequent analyses being based on thesea priori distinctions. The fourth or constructivist approach questions this naturalized dichotomy, calling attention instead to mutual contingency or conjoint constitution: What we take to be “physical facts” are likely to be strongly shaped by social construction processes, and at the same time, what we take to be “strictly social” will often have been shaped in part by taken-for-granted realities of the physical world. Technology offers important opportunities for tracing these interconnections, being an embodiment of both the physical and the social. The point is illustrated with a long-term historical analysis of a specific physiographic feature—a mountain—that has undergone little overtphysical change over the centuries, but has undergone repeated changes in its social meanings and uses. Few of the changes would have been possible in the absence of the mountain's physiographic characteristics; similarly, few would have occurred in the absence of changing sociocultural definitions and possibilities. The challenge for sociology is not just to recognize the importance of both the physical and the social factors, and certainly not to argue over the relative importance of the two, but to recognize the extent to which what we take to be “physical” and “social” factors can be conjointly constituted.

Key words

environment-society relationships analytical separation analytical primary balanced dualism constructivism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Iron and Steel Institute Various dates Annual Statistical Report. Washington DC: American Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Bath, Victoria 1992 Assistant Director, Menominee Range Historical Society. Iron Mountain, MI. Personal interview. August 24.Google Scholar
  3. Bayley, R. W., C. E. Dutton, andC. A. Lamey 1966 “Geology of the Menominee iron-bearing district Dickinson County, Michigan and Florence and Marinette Counties, Wisconsin.” Geological Survey Professional Paper 513. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, Peter L. andThomas Luckmann 1966 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, L. L. 1925 “A classification of environments.” American Journal of Sociology 31:318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloor, David 1991 Knowledge and Social Imagery. Second edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buttel, Frederick H. 1986 “Sociology and the environment: The winding road toward human ecology.” International Social Science Journal 38:337–356.Google Scholar
  8. 1987 “New directions in environmental sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel andBruno Latour 1992 “Don't throw the baby out with the Bath School! A reply to Collins and Yearley.” In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture: 343–68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Catton, Bruce 1976 Michigan: A Bicentennial History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Catton, William R., Jr. 1972 “Sociology in an age of fifth wheels.” Social Forces 50:436–447.Google Scholar
  12. 1980 Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  13. Catton, William R., Jr. andRiley E. Dunlap 1978 “Environmental sociology: A new paradigm.” The American Sociologist 13:41–49.Google Scholar
  14. Choldin, Harvey M. 1978 “Social life and the physical environment.” In D. Street (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Urban Life: 352–384. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, Harry M. andSteven Yearley 1992 “Epistemological chicken.” In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture: 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Connor, Mary Roddis 1978 “Logging in northeastern Wisconsin.” In Ramon R. Hernandez (ed.), Some Historic Events in Wisconsin's Logging Industry: 31–38. Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Forest History Association. Madison, WI, Sept. 9.Google Scholar
  17. Cottrell, Fred 1955 Energy and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Cronon, William 1991 Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great Midwest. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. 1992 “Kennecott journey: The paths out of town.” In William Cronon, George Miles, and Jay Gitlin (eds.), Under An Open Sky: Rethinking America's Western Past: 28–51. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Crowell and Murray, Inc. 1930 The Iron Ores of Lake Superior: Containing the Facts of Interest Relating to Mining, Beneficiation and Shipping of the Ore and Location of Principal Mines. Seventh edition. Cleveland, OH: The Penton Press Co.Google Scholar
  21. Cummings, William John 1984 Iron Mountain's Cornish Pumping Engine and the Mines it Dewatered. Iron Mountain, MI: Friends of the Museum.Google Scholar
  22. 1991 Dickinson County, Michigan: From Earliest Times Through the Twenties. Iron Mountain, MI: Jostens.Google Scholar
  23. Dickens, Peter 1992 Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dunlap, Riley E. andWilliam R. Catton, Jr. 1979 “Environmental sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 5:243–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 1983 “What environmental sociologists have in common (whether concerned with ‘built’ or ‘natural’ environments).” Sociological Inquiry 53:113–135.Google Scholar
  26. Durkheim, Emile 1933 The Division of Labor in Society. (1893) (W. D. Halls, tr.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Firey, Walter 1960 Man, Mind, and Land: A Theory of Resource Use. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Foster, J. W. andJ. D. Witney 1851 Report on the Geology of the Lake Superior Land District, Part II: The Iron Region, Together with General Geology. Washington, DC: A. Boyd Hamilton.Google Scholar
  29. Freudenburg, William R. 1985 “Succession and success: A new look at an old concept.” Sociological Spectrum 5:269–289.Google Scholar
  30. 1992 “Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy.” Rural Sociology 57:305–332.Google Scholar
  31. Freudenburg, William R. andRobert Gramling 1992 “Community impacts of technological change: Toward a longitudinal perspective.” Social Forces 70:937–955.Google Scholar
  32. 1993 “Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: Understanding opposition and support for offshore oil.” Sociological Forum 8:341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 1994a “Middle-range theory and cutting-edge sociology: A call for cumulation.” Environment, Technology and Society 76:1, 3–7.Google Scholar
  34. 1994b Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle over Offshore Oil. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. 1994c “Bureaucratic slippage and failures of agency vigilance: The case of the environmental studies program.” Social Problems 41:214–239.Google Scholar
  36. Guterbock, Thomas M. 1990 “The effects of snow on urban density patterns in the United States.” Environment and Behavior 22: 358–386.Google Scholar
  37. Hemingway, Ernest 1952 The Old Man and the Sea. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  38. Hickerson, Harold 1970 The Chippewa and their Neighbors: A Study in Ethnohistory. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  39. Hodge, Frederick W. 1979 Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Part I. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Hoffman, Walter James 1896 The Menomini Indians. Extract From the Fourteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. Hogan, William T. 1971 Economic History of the Iron and Steel Industry in the United States. Vol. 1. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  42. Humphrey, Craig R. andFrederick R. Buttel 1982 Environment, Energy and Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  43. Huntington, Ellsworth 1924 The Character of Races as Influenced by the Physical Environment, Natural Selection and Historical Development. New York: Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  44. Ingalls, E. S. 1981 The Iron Mines of Menominee County Michigan. (1871)* Iron Mountain, MI: The Mid-Penninsula Library Cooperative.Google Scholar
  45. Iron Mountain Iron Mine n.d. Tour guide information packet. Unpublished. P. O. Box 177, Iron Mountain, MI 49801.Google Scholar
  46. Jervis, Robert 1976 Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Karamanski, Theodore J. 1989 Deep Woods Frontier: A History of Logging in Northern Michigan. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Keller, Evelyn Fox 1985 Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Klausner, Samuel Z. 1971 On Man in His Environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  50. Knorr-Cetina, Karin 1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  51. Krogman, Naomi T. and JoAnne D. Darlington 1995 “A longitudinal analysis of society-environment relations.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, August.Google Scholar
  52. (The) Lake Superior Iron Ore Association 1938 Lake Superior Iron Ores. Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
  53. 1952 Lake Superior Iron Ores: Mining Directory and Statistical Record of the Lake Superior Iron Ore District of the United States and Canada. Second edition. Cleveland, OH: The William Feather Company.Google Scholar
  54. Latour, Bruno andSteve Woolgar 1986 Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Second edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Law, John andWiebe E. Bijker 1992 “Postscript: Technology, stability, and social theory.” In J. Law and W. E. Bijker (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change: 290–308. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Leopold, Aldo 1949 “Thinking Like a Mountain.” In Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There: 129–133. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  57. Lewontin, Richard C. 1991 Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  58. Marx, Karl andFrederick Engels 1955 Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Selected Works in Two Volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  59. McKenney, Thomas L. andJames Hall 1933 The Indian Tribes of North America. Vol. 2. Frederick W. Hodge, (ed.). Edinburgh: J. Grant.Google Scholar
  60. Misa, Thomas J. 1992 “Controversy and closure in technological change: Constructing ‘steel’.” In J. Law and W. E. Bijker (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change: 109–139. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Nursey, Walter R. 1891 The Menominee Iron Range. Milwaukee, WI: Swain and Tate.Google Scholar
  62. Parsons, Talcott 1960 “An outline of the social system.” In Talcott Parsons, Edward Shils, Kaspar D. Naegege, and Jesse R. Pitts, (eds.), Theories of Society: Foundations of Modern Sociological Theory: 30–79. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Perrow, Charles 1984 Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  64. Pickering, Andrew 1993 “The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science.” American Journal of Sociology 99:559–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pinch, Trevor andWeibe Bijker 1984 “The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other.” Social Studies of Science 14:399–441.Google Scholar
  66. Quimby, George Irving 1960 Indian Life in the Upper Great Lakes: 11,000 B.C. to A.D. 1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Schnaiberg, Allan 1980 The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  68. Schnaiberg, Allan andKenneth A. Gould 1994 Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stanley, Manfred 1968 “Nature, culture and scarcity: Forward to a theoretical synthesis.” American Sociological Review 33:855–870.Google Scholar
  70. Sundeen, Paul 1992 Geologist, Office of Subsurface and Petroleum Geology. Geological Survey Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Personal correspondence, October 28.Google Scholar
  71. Tuana, Nancy 1989 Feminism and Science. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  72. United States Department of Commerce 1975 Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  73. United States Bureau of Mines Various dates “Iron ore.” Minerals Yearbook. Department of Interior. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  74. Wieck, Karl 1976 “Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21:1–19.Google Scholar
  75. Wolf, Eric R. 1982 Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  76. Worster, Donald 1990 “Transformations of the earth: Toward an agroecological perspective in history.” Journal of American History 76:1087–1106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • William R. Freudenburg
    • 1
  • Scott Frickel
    • 2
  • Robert Gramling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Rural SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of Southwestern LouisianaLafayette

Personalised recommendations