Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 547–568 | Cite as

Racial classification in criminology: The reproduction of racialized crime

  • Jeanette Covington
Articles

Abstract

The (re)production of knowledge about crime is cultural in terms of the questions asked, the comparisons made, and the hypotheses selected to explain crime causation. Since criminologists do not operate in a vacuum, any prejudgments, biases, and beliefs acquired before their professional socialization may well persist and affect their approach to research over the course of their academic careers. Because American criminologists live in a society that racializes a number of problem behaviors, including crime, it is conceivable that widely held beliefs about race that predate graduate training will find their way into assumptions about the relationship between race and crime. Such preprofessional beliefs are transformed into “facts” when they meet with widespread agreement from other criminologists and thus come to be taken for granted in the objective pursuit of knowledge. Crime is racialized, for example, when the criminal behaviors of individual black offenders are understood in terms of “racial traits,” “racial motives,” or “racial experiences.” When traits, motives, or experiences are classified as the property of whole races or racial communities, these conceptions of race assume causal significance in explaining criminal behavior. Because these traits, motives, and experiences are supposedly shared by entire races or race-class categories, the predisposition to criminality becomes generalized beyond individual Black criminals to whole races or racial communities of noncriminal Blacks. When crime is thus racialized, whole communities or whole categories of phenotypically similar individuals are rendered precriminal and morally suspect. In addition, such racializations in academic criminology can be used to justify increased control of individual black criminals in the larger society; these controls can also legitimately be extended to encompass whole communities and whole categories of phenotypically similar persons who are not involved in crime. This paper will address the role that racializing assumptions play in traditional criminological theories.

Key words

racial classification criminology racialized crime 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, E. 1990 Streetwise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, J. andP. Blau 1982 “The cost of inequality: Metropolitan structure and violent crime.” American Sociological Review 47:114–129.Google Scholar
  3. Brantingham, P. andP. Brantingham 1991 Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics 1994 Criminal Victimization in the U.S., 1992. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Calvin, A. 1981 “Unemployment among Black youths, demographics and crime.” Crime and Delinquency 27:234–244.Google Scholar
  6. Carter, R. andK. Hill 1979 The Criminal's Image of the City. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  7. Comer, J. 1985 “Black violence and public policy.” In L. Curtis (ed.), American Violence and Public Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cornish, D. andR. Clarke 1986 The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Empey, L. 1982 American Delinquency. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  10. Gould, L. 1969 “Who defines delinquency?” Social Problems 16:325–336.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, A. 1991 “Race, class and crime.” in J. Sheley (ed.), Criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, D. 1983 “Black and White homicide differentials: alternatives to an inadequate theory.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 10:407–440.Google Scholar
  13. Huizinga, D. andD. Elliott 1987 “Juvenile offenders: Prevalence, offender incidence, and arrest rates by race.” Crime and Delinquency 33:206–223.Google Scholar
  14. Institute for Social Research 1992 Monitoring the Future. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  15. Jencks, C. 1991 “Is the American underclass growing?” In C. Jencks and P. Peterson (eds.), The Urban Underclass. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Jennings, J. 1994 Understanding the Nature of Poverty in Urban America. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Kasarda, J. 1992 “The severely distressed in economically transforming cities.” In A. Harrell and G. Peterson (eds.), Drugs, Crime and Social Isolation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, J. 1988 Seductions of Crime. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  19. Kappeler, V., M. Blumberg, andG. Potter 1993 The Mythology of Crime and Justice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  20. Mann, C. R. 1993 Unequal Justice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Peterson, G. andA. Harrell 1992 “Introduction: Inner city isolation and opportunity.” In A. Harrell and G. Peterson (eds.), Drugs, Crime and Social Isolation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pope, C. 1979 “Race and crime revisited.” Crime and Delinquency 25:347–357.Google Scholar
  23. Rose, H. andP. McClain 1990 Race, Place and Risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rose, T., ed. 1969 Violence in America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Sampson, R. 1987 “Urban Black violence.” American Journal of Sociology 93:348–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sampson, R. andJ. Laub 1993 Crime in the Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sampson, R. andW. J. Wilson 1995 “Toward a theory of race, crime and urban inequality.” In J. Hagan and R. Peterson (eds.), Crime and Inequality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Silberman, C. 1980 Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  29. Steffensmeier, D. andE. Allan 1991 “Gender, age and crime.” In J. Sheley (ed.), Criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  30. Surette, R. 1992 Media, Crime and Criminal Justice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, R. andJ. Covington 1988 “Neighborhood changes in ecology and violence.” Criminology 26:553–590.Google Scholar
  32. Thrasher, F. 1927 The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, S. 1990 “Reform society: Provide opportunity.” In D. Kelly (ed.), Criminal Behavior. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, S. 1985 Sense and Nonsense About Crime. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  35. Webster, Y. 1992 The Racialization of America. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, J. Q. andR. Herrnstein 1985 Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  37. Wilson, W. J. 1987 The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, W. J. 1991a “Public policy research and the truly disadvantaged.” In C. Jencks and P. Peterson (eds.), The Urban Underclass. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, W. J. 1991b “The poor image of Black men.” New Perspectives Quarterly 8:26.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfgang, M. andF. Ferracuti 1967 The Subculture of Violence. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  41. Young, V. andA. T. Sulton 1991 “Excluded; The current status of African-American scholars in the field of criminology and criminal justice.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 28:101–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanette Covington
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyRutgers UniversityNew Brunswick

Personalised recommendations