Skip to main content
Log in

Problems of comparative history

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Friedrich Schiller, “Was heißt und zu welchem Ende studiert man Universalgeschichte?” In: F. SchillersSämtliche Werke (Weimar: Böhlau, 1970), Historische Schriften, S. 763. (Also quoted by Theodor Schieder, “Möglichkeiten und Grenzen vergleichender Methoden in der Geschichtwissenschaft”.Historische Zeitschrift, Band 200, Heft 3 (Juni 1965), S. 533.)

  2. Johann Gustav Droysen,Historik. Vorlesungen über Enziklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte. Hrsg. von Rudolf Hübner (München-Berlin: Verlag R. Oldenburg, 1937), S. 162. ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Max Weber,The Methodology of Social Sciences. (New York: Free Press, 19695), p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See in greater detail: William H. Sewell, “Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative History”.History and Theory, vol. 4 (1967), No. 2. pp. 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. В. И. Ленин,Польное собрание сочинений, Изд. 5. (Москва: Госполитиздат, 1961), ТОМ 25, с. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. I. Lenin,Op. Cit., Изд. 5. (Москва: Госполитиздат, 1961), ТОМ 25, pp. 263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Е. С. Макарян, «Об основных принципах сравнительной историографии».Воиросы Исмории, 1966, Но. 7. с. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Antonio Gramsci, “Párt, állam, politika” (Party, state, politics). Filozófiai írások, (Philosophic writings), (Budapest: Kossuth Könyv-kiadó, 1970), p. 302.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Antonio Gramsci,Note sul Machiavelli. (Torino, 1949), p. 22.

  10. OMGE—Országos Magyar Gazdasági Egyesület (National Hungarian Economic Association).

  11. A. Gramsci,Op. cit., Note sul Machiavelli. (Torino, 1949), p. 21.

  12. A. Gramsci, “Párt, állam, politika”. In:Filozófiai írások, op. cit.( p. 307.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Gramsci,Op. cit., “, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The section of this paper which follows is taken from an article written in collaboration with Ivan T. Berend: „Az egyetemes gazdaságtörténet módszeréhez és felfogásálioz” (The methodology and interpretation of universal economic history).Századok, vol. 1 (1971), No. 1.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ránki, G. Problems of comparative history. Neohelicon 2, 39–63 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02092968

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02092968

Keywords

Navigation