Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and characterization of lytic phages fromBacterioides ruminicola ssbrevis

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two bacteriophages (φBrb01 and φBrb02), lytic toBacteroides ruminicola ssbrevis AR20, were isolated from sewage water. Both phages possessed polyhedral heads and long noncontractile tails, and were classified as Siphoviridae of morphotype B1. Bacteria resistant to phages φBrb01 and φBrb02 arose following lysis of broth cultures. Survivors of φBrb01 infection were capsulated but remained susceptible to φBrb02 infection. Survivors of φBrb02 infection were noncapsulated and were resistant to attack by both φBrb01 and φBrb02. Neither phage lysogenized the host. Both phages contained double-stranded DNA, and their restriction endonuclease digestion patterns indicated that the phage genomes were circularly permuted and terminally redundant. Phage φBrb01 genome was examined in greater detail and confirmed to be circularly permuted, of size 33 kb, with a terminal redundancy of 2 kb, or 6% of the length of the genome. Circularly permuted genomes in phages of rumen bacteria do not appear to have been reported previously.

At present, there is considerable interest in the genetic manipulation of rumen bacteria. The characterization of the phages described herein provides the basic information required for their use in the construction of vectors for the transfer of genetic material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Ackermann HW, Du Bow MS (1987) Viruses of prokaryotes, Vol 1. General properties of Bacteriophages. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Booth SJ, Van Tassell RL, Johnson JL, Wilkins TD (1979) Bacteriophages ofBacteroides. Rev Infect Dis 1:325–336

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burt S, Meldrum S, Woods DR, Jones DT (1978) Colonial variation, capsule formation, and bacteriophage resistance inBacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:439–443

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grund AD, Hutchinson CR (1987) Bacteriophages ofSaccharopolyspora erythraea. J Bacteriol 169:3013–3022

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hudman JF, Gregg K (1989) Genetic diversity among strains of bacteria from the rumen. Curr Microbiol 19:313–319

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson EN, Jackson DA, Deans RJ (1978)EcoRI analysis of bacteriophage P22 DNA packaging. J Mol Biol 118:365–388

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kai M, Watanabe S, Furuse K, Ozawa A (1985)Bacteriodes bacteriophages isolated from human feces. Microbiol Immunol 29:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klieve AV, Bauchop T (1988) Morphological diversity of ruminal bacteriophages from sheep and cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1637–1641

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klieve AV, Hudman JF, Bauchop T (1989) Inducible bacteriophages from ruminal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:1630–1634

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knox MR, Harris JE (1986) Isolation and characterization of a bacteriophage ofMethanobrevibacter smithii strain PS. Abstracts of the XIV International Congress of Microbiology 1986:240

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lockington RA, Attwood GT, Brooker JD (1988) Isolation and characterization of a temperate bacteriophage from the ruminal anaerobeSelenomonas ruminantium. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1575–1580

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  13. Molloy PL, Powell BC, Gregg K, Barone ED, Rogers GE (1982) Organisation of feather keratin genes in the chick genome. Nucleic Acids Res 10:6007–6021

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paynter MJB, Ewert DL, Chalupa W (1969) Some morphological types of bacteriophages in bovine rumen contents. Appl Microbiol 18:942–943

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritchie AE, Robinson IM, Allison MJ (1970) Rumen bacteriophage: survey of morphological types. In: Favard P (ed) Microscopie électronique, vol 3. Paris: Société Française de Microscopie Électronique, pp 333–334

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russell JB, Wilson DB (1988) Potential opportunities and problems for genetically altered rumen microorganisms. J Nutr 118:271–279

    Google Scholar 

  17. Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ware CE, Bauchop T, Gregg K (1989) The isolation and comparison of cellulase genes from two strains ofRuminococcus albus. J Gen Microbiol 135:921–930

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woods JR, Hudman JF, Gregg K (1989) Isolation of an endoglucanase gene fromBacteroides ruminicola subsp.brevis. J Gen Microbiol 135:2543–2549

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klieve, A.V., Gregg, K. & Bauchop, T. Isolation and characterization of lytic phages fromBacterioides ruminicola ssbrevis . Current Microbiology 23, 183–187 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02092277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02092277

Keywords

Navigation